바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

사전예약을 통한 구매결정이 소비자의 선택에 미치는 영향력의 작동원리에 관한 실증연구

The Mechanism of the Influence of Advanced Selling on Consumer Choice

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.6, pp.81-87
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.6.201606.81
김경호 (Department of Business, Keimyung University)
이형탁 (Department of Business, Keimyung University)
서헌주 (Department of Business, Sogang University)

Abstract

Purpose - In recent, a research finds that advanced selling can influence a consumer's choice(Kim et al., 2013). Advanced selling is defined as the new product launching strategy which company allows consumers to preorder new product before its release(Chu & Zhang, 2011). Prior researches have focused on the benefits of advanced selling(e.g., information gathering for demand prediction, an advantage for pricing strategy, and so on) for companies using this strategy(Chen, 2001; Chu & Zhang, 2011; Li & Zhang, 2013; Tang et al., 2004; Xie & Shugan, 2009). However, Kim et al.(2013) find it can also influence a consumer's choice. In detail, they suggest that when consumers use advanced selling, they are likely to prefer high-performance options rather than low-price options based on construal level theory(Trope & Liberman, 2003). In this paper, we tried to expand the prior researches for finding the mechanism of the influence of advanced selling on a consumer's choice. The purpose of this research is to test the mediating effect on the influence of advanced selling. Research design, data, and methodology - To find the mechanism of the influence of advanced selling, we designed an experiment for testing mediation effect. we recruited 93 students from a university. We assigned participants into one of two groups using randomization method. The participants with each group were given a scenario describing the sales strategy. Finally, they made a choice between high-performance option and low-price option. Sequentially, they also responded some questions for testing mediation effect. Results - First, we replicated prior research to test the influence of advanced selling. As a result, we could find that consumers prefer the high-performance option when they preorder it to purchase at the time of consumption. Thus, the replication result is the same as prior research. Second, we tested that advanced selling can influence the perception of temporal distance. The results confirmed that consumers perceived longer temporal distance in advanced selling condition(&#x03B2; = 1.575, SE = 0.272, p < 0.001). Third, we predicted that temporal distance can increase the importance of desirable attributes and decrease the importance of feasible attributes. The results suggested that temporal distance decreased significantly the importance of attributes related to feasibility(&#x03B2; = -0.19, SE = 0.07, p < 0.01), however, it had non-significant effect on increasing the importance of desirable attributes. Finally, we used Sobel-test for testing mediation effect, and it confirmed that the importance of feasible attributes had mediating role of the influence of advanced selling(Sobel test statistic = -2.110, SE = 0.111, p < 0.05). Conclusions - In this paper, we tried to find the mechanism of the influence on advanced selling from a consumer's choice. With an experiment, we confirmed that the importance of feasible attributes could mediate the effect on advanced selling. Therefore, we suggested some theoretical and practical contributions from this research. Finally, we discussed research limitations and suggested future research topics.

keywords
Advanced Selling, Preorder Strategy, Mechanism, Construal Level Theory, Consumer Choice

참고문헌

1.

Chen, F. (2001). Market segmentation, advanced demand information, and supply chain performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(1), 53-67.

2.

Chu, L. Y., & Zhang, H. (2011). Optimal preorder strategy with endogenous information control. Management Science, 57(6), 1055-1077.

3.

Eval, T., Sagristano, M., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35-43.

4.

Kim, K. H., Jun, S. Y., & Park, H. K. (2013). The influence of advanced selling on consumer choice. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 28(5), 1-18.

5.

Kyung, E. J., Menon, G., & Trope, Y. (2010). Reconstruction of things past: Why do some memories feel so close and others so far away?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 217-220.

6.

Li, C., & Zhang, F. (2013). Advance demand information, price discrimination, and preorder strategies. Manufacturing &Service Operations Management, 15(1), 57-71.

7.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5.

8.

Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117.

9.

McCardle, K., Rajaram, K., & Tang, C. S. (2004). Advance booking discount programs under retail competition. Management Science, 50(5), 701-708.

10.

Moe, W. W., & Fader, P. S. (2002). Fast-track: Article using advance purchase orders to forecast new product sales. Marketing Science, 21(3), 347-364.

11.

Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Creeping dispositionism: the temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 485-497.

12.

Tang, C. S., Rajaram, K., Alptekinoğlu, A., & Ou, J. (2004). The benefits of advance booking discount programs: Model and analysis. Management Science, 50(4), 465-478.

13.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403.

14.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876.

15.

Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6), 358-361.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)