바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

이전 다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.14 No.9
Citation Share

Qualitative Simulation on the Dynamics between Social Capital and Business Performance in Strategic Networks

Qualitative Simulation on the Dynamics between Social Capital and Business Performance in Strategic Networks

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.9, pp.31-45
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.9.201609.31
Kim, Dong-Seok (Dept. of Management, Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies)
Chung, Chang-Kwon (Interdisciplinary Program of EcoCreative, The Graduate School, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Dong-Seok, & Chung, Chang-Kwon. (2016). Qualitative Simulation on the Dynamics between Social Capital and Business Performance in Strategic Networks. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 14(9), 31-45, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.9.201609.31
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Purpose - This study develops a simulation model that looks at the dynamics between social capital and business performance in strategic networks to understand their behaviors in relation to each other, and to suggest dynamic relationship strategies. Research design, data, and methodology - Based on existing literature, this study identifies the complex causal loop diagram on social capital and business performance in strategic networks, and converts them into a simulation model for observing how the changes in business environment and relationship dependency affect social capital and business performance. Results - The simulation results showed that, first, the formation in social capital and business performance of networks with low relationship dependency was less affected by the changes in business environment. Second, the formation in social capital and business performance of networks with high relationship dependency was negatively impacted by the changes in business environment. In other words, higher relationship dependency strengthened the impact of changes in business environment on business performance. Conclusions - Thus, this study confirmed that in strategic networks, the changes in business environment and the degree of relationship dependency dynamically affect business performance, and that relationship dependency mediates the degree in which changes in the business environment affect business performance. The results of the simulations were further verified through actual business cases.

keywords
Social Capital, Business Performance, Strategic Networks, System Dynamics, Qualitative Simulation

참고문헌

1.

Barros, C. P., & Peypoch, N. (2009). An evaluation of European airlines’ operational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(2), 525-533.

2.

Bhagwat, R., & Sharma, M. K. (2007). Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 43-62.

3.

Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of management, 29(6), 991-1013.

4.

Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.

5.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.

6.

Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization studies, 22(2), 251-283.

7.

De Wever, S., Martens, R., & Vandenbempt, K. (2005). The impact of trust on strategic resource acquisition through interorganizational networks: Towards a conceptual model. Human relations, 58(12), 1523-1543.

8.

Dyer, J. H., P. Kale, & Singh, H. (2001). How to make strategic alliances work. MIT Sloan management review, 42(4), 37-43.

9.

Elg, U., & Johansson, U. (2001). International alliances: how they contribute to managing the interorganizational challenges of globalization. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 9(2), 93-110.

10.

Featherston, C. R., & Doolan, M. (2013). Using System Dynamics to Inform Scenario Planning: A Case Study. Proceeding of International Conference of the System Dynamics Society(pp.1-10). Massachusetts, USA.

11.

Frazier, G. L. (1983). Interorganizational exchange behavior in marketing channels: a broadened perspective. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 68-78.

12.

Gallois, J. P., & Pierron, J. Y. (2016). Qualitative simulation and validation of complex hybrid systems. Proceedings of the 8th European Congress on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (pp.289-298). Toulouse, France: ERTS.

13.

Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference (pp. 6-9). Lisbon, Portugal: RADMA.

14.

Gruen, T. W., Summers, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. Journal of marketing, 64(3), 34-49.

15.

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1988). The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 20-35.

16.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of service research, 4(3), 230-247.

17.

Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004). Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. Academy of management journal, 47(2), 241-253.

18.

Inkpen, A. C. & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, network, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.

19.

Jackob, N. G. E. (2010). No alternatives? The relationship between perceived media dependency, use of alternative information sources, and general trust in mass media. International Journal of Communication, 4, 589-606.

20.

Jacobs, D. (1974). Dependency and vulnerability: An exchange approach to the control of organizations. Administrative science, 19(1), 45-59.

21.

Kassim, M. N., & Abdulla, M. A. A. (2006). The influence of attraction on internet banking: an extension to the trust-relationship commitment model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(6), 424-442.

22.

Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of operations management, 25(2), 528-545.

23.

Kim, Dong-Hwan (2000). A Simulation Method of Cognitive Maps. Proceedings of International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management. Geelong, Australia: ICSTM.

24.

Kim, Dong-Seok, & Chung, Chang-Kwon (2016). Exploratory Study of Causal Relationship between Social Capital and Performance on Strategic Networks: Systems Thinking Analysis. Korean System Dynamics Society, 17(1), 41-64.

25.

Kuipers, B., & Berleant, D. (1988). Using Incomplete Quantitative Knowledge In Qualitative Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp.324-329). San Mateo, CA.:Morgan Kaufmann.

26.

Kwon, S. W., & Adler, P. S. (2014). Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 412-422.

27.

Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success:conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 141-158.

28.

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International journal of innovation management, 5(3), 377-400.

29.

Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317-338.

30.

Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.

31.

Lui, S. S., Wong, Y. Y., & Liu, W. (2009). Asset specificity roles in interfirm cooperation: Reducing opportunistic behavior or increasing cooperative behavior?. Journal of Business research, 62(11), 1214-1219.

32.

Murray, J. Y., & Kotabe, M. (2005). Performance Implications of Strategic Fit between Alliance Attributes and Alliance Forms. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1525-1533.

33.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.

34.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.

35.

Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499-515.

36.

Rasheed, H. S., & Geiger, S. W. (2001). Determinants of governance structure for the electronic value chain:Resource dependency and transaction costs perspectives. Journal of Business Strategies, 18(2), 160-176.

37.

Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty. Journal of business research, 60(1), 21-31.

38.

Saadatpour, A., & Albert, R. (2016). A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative dynamic models of biological regulatory networks. EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, 4(1), 1-13.

39.

Slootweg, J. G., De Haan, S. W. H., Polinder, H., & Kling, W. L. (2003). General model for representing variable speed wind turbines in power system dynamics simulations. IEEE Transactions on power systems, 18(1), 144-151.

40.

Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network process and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3, Special Issue), 265-284.

41.

Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.

42.

Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization science, 13(2), 179-190.

43.

Tyler, B. B. (2001). The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and technology management, 18(1), 1-27.

44.

Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011). The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships: A social capital perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 561-576.

45.

Wagner, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2003). How does sustainability performance relate to business competitiveness?. Greener Management International, 44(Winter), 5-16.

46.

Westlund, H., & Adam, F. (2010). Social capital and economic performance: A meta-analysis of 65 studies. European Planning Studies, 18(6), 893-919.

47.

Williamson, O. E. (2008). Outsourcing: transaction cost economics and supply chain management. Journal of supply chain management, 44(2), 5-16.

48.

Winz, I., Brierley, G., & Trowsdale, S. (2009). The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water resources management, 23(7), 1301-1323.

49.

Wright, A. G., & Hopwood, C. J. (2016). Advancing the assessment of dynamic psychological processes. Assessment, 23, 399-403.

50.

Wilkinson, I., & Young, L. (2002). On cooperating: firms, relations and networks. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 123-132.

51.

Williamson, O. (1985). The economic intstitutions of capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press..

52.

Zaheer, A., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 203-215.

53.

Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B. B., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368-38

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책