바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

화물유통 O2O 비즈니스모델에 대한 차주의 인식 연구

A Study on Trucker Recognition in Korean Cargo Distribution O2O Business Model

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.2, pp.79-90
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.2.201702.79
구병모 (Faculty of Business Administration, Hansei University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - Cargo Distribution O2O Business Model is the form of business that connects the cargo and empty cargo-truck based on mobile online platform. In Korean cargo distribution market, FIN(Freight Information Network) is the only model that represents O2O Business Model. The purpose of this paper is investigating the recognition of driver who is the only source of income toward cargo distribution O2O Business Model, and based on the investigated recognition of trucker, suggesting strategic implication. Research design, data, and methodology - PESTLE methodology which is massive environment analysis, and 5 Forces Model when analyze the present and future of cargo distribution O2O business market of industrial structure analysis were used as investigation methodology. Also structured questionnaire was used for trucker's recognition investigation. Based on collected 196 structured effective questionnaires organized with 26 questions were analyzed using statistics package. Results - 51.3% of responded driver is non-differentiated, deprofessionalize form that transport all types of cargo. 95.4% recognize cargo distribution O2O Business Model, FIN is needed, especially during back-hall(94.7%). As a payment method, monthly due is preferred(73%), but it is also needed to pay annual due and pay whenever cargo and cargo-truck are connected(24.5%). Trucker prefer FIN operation corporation which has rich supply(85.2%), and is liberal in supply in any domestic area(75.5%). Conclusions - First, 91% was the member of FIN, and 95% of non-member recognized FIN is needed. 83% of them has the intent to be the member of FIN. Second, besides of monthly due as payment method of FIN, 25% has positive recognition toward new payment method. The new payment method means paying annual due and pay whenever cargo and cargo-truck are connected. Third, because of information imbalance about the cargo and cargo-truck among, operators whose business goal is FIN, it was investigated that transportation fee is low and commission charge of broker is high. The core of Korean Cargo Distribution O2O Business Model, FIN, is online platform that matches cargo and cargo-truck. Therefore, FIN operator should minimize the amount of single transportation of trucker. This study suggests the development of shipper using FIN, diversify distribution channel, suggesting backhaul toward trucker as solution to FIN operator.

keywords
Cargo Distribution O2O, Business Model, Trucker Recognition, Online Platform, Freight Information Network

참고문헌

1.

Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898.

2.

Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing Nicely: On shareable goods and the emergency of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale Law Journal, 114(2), 273-358.

3.

Candle, J., Paul, D., & Turner, P. (2010). Business Analysis Techniques, 72 Essential Tools for Success, BCS The Chartered Institute for IT(Swindon). Retrieved December 15, 2016, from http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/business-analysis-techniques.pdf

4.

Chinomona, R. (2012). The Role of Dealer’ Non-Mediated Power in Fostering SME Manufacturers’ Cooperation:SME Manufacturers’ Perspective. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 3(2), 5-16.

5.

Coo, B. M., & Kim, S. G.(2016) An Exploratory Study on Market Condition of Freight Information Network in Korean Logistics Online Platform Service Industry. The Journal of Business Education, 30(5), 81-99.

6.

Coo, B. M., & Seo, D. S.(2016). A Study of Business Model of Logistics O2O Industry: Focused on Korean Freight Information Network Business. Korea Logistics Review, 26(6), 13-23.

7.

Farrel, J., & Saloner, G.(1986). Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review, 16, 70-83.

8.

Goudin, P. (2016). The cost of non-Europe in the sharing economy: economic, social and legal challenge and opportunity. European Parliamentary Research Service, Retrieved December 5, 2016, from https://epthinktank.eu/2016/02/11/the-cost-of-non-europe-in-the-sharing-economy-economic-social-and-legal-challenges-and-opportunities/

9.

IshtiaqIshaq, M., Uussain, N., Khaliq, W., & Waqas, M. (2012). A Review on Triple-A Supply Chain Performance. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(2), 35-39.

10.

Johnson, G., Whittington, R., & Scholes, K. (2009). Exploring Corporate Strategy with My Strategy Lab. New York: Prentice Hall.

11.

Jin, H., & Kim, M. J. (2015). A Study on the Effect of Circle Trust on Online WOM in Chinese Mobile SNS:Focusing of Mediating Effect of the Operational Performance. The Journal of Business Education, 29(3), 85-102.

12.

Kang, H. S. (2016). O2O and Logistics Strategy. Dong-A Business Review, 2(197), 82-88.

13.

Kim, C. H. (2016). A Dynamic Mobile Service Architecture for Activating O2O Business. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(1), 710-716.

14.

Kim, K. Y., & Kim, H. G. (2013). A Study on Consumer Preference Typologing toward Sharing Economy Service Models Based on Collaborative Consumption:A Strategic Approach to Marketing Communications. Korean Society for The Science Study of Subjective, 27, 23-40.

15.

Kim, H. J., Park, J. W., & Jo, D. H. (2016). An Empirical Study on Success Factors of Sharing Economy Service. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 214-229.

16.

Kim, H. R., & Yoon, S. J. (2014). Continuance Intentions in Mobile Instant Messaging: Focused on Network Externalities and Perceived. Korea Customer Satisfaction Management Association, 16(2), 67-77.

17.

Kim, I. K. (2013). A Study on Business Model Framework of Low Carbon City. Seoul Studies, 14(3), 87-103.

18.

KOTI (2013). KOTI Logistics Brief. 5(6), 3.

19.

Kotler, P., Keller, K., Brady, M., Goodman, M., & Hansen, T. (2009). Marketing Management. New York:Prentice-Hall.

20.

Kwon, Y. M., Park, J. S., Lee, H. J., & Kim, M. G. (2014). Beacon-Based O2O Marketing for Financial Institution. International Journal of Industrial & Business, 5(4), 23-29.

21.

Lee, J. Y., Kim, Y. H., & Yoon, Y. R. (2016). An NFC-based O2O service model in exhibition-space. Proceedings of ICEC ’16 International Conference, Suwon, Republic of Korea. Article No.: 42, doi:10.1145/2971603.2971645

22.

Lessing, L. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York:The Penguin Press.

23.

Magretta, J., & Stone, N. (2002). What management is:how it works and why it’s everyone’s business. New York: Free Press.

24.

Moris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735.

25.

Oh, S. J., Kim, Y. Y., Ahn, J. H., & Kim, M. H. (2005). The Competition and Evolution of Internet Portals: In the Perspective of Service Quality and Interpersonal Interactive. The Korea Contents Association, 5(4), 1-10.

26.

Timmers, P. (1988). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3-8.

27.

The Korea Transport Institute (2015). Trend of Freight Transportation Market 2015. Issue the Forth Quarter, 44, 53-68.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)