바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

프랜차이즈 가맹본부와 가맹점 간 이해관계불일치가 관계몰입과 관계성과에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Composite Incompatibility on Relationship Commitment and Performances in Franchiser-Franchisee Relationship

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.2, pp.91-100
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.2.201702.91
이호택 (Department of Business Administration, Keimyung University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - Domestic franchise market has been grown steadily, reaching 50 trillion won in sales and 3,360 franchise headquarters in 2014. A franchise system is an effective business system for the franchisees to lower the failure rate due to the fact that the inexperienced entrepreneurs are supported by their headquarters through the franchisee contract. However, there are also conflicts between franchiser and franchisee behind the quantitative growth of domestic franchise industry. Therefore, it is very important to structure the causes of conflicts and to examine the effect of factors on the relationship commitment and performances. Research design, data, and methodology - In this study, the author divides the composite incompatibility between the franchise and the franchisee into goal incongruity, domain dissensus, and perceptual differences, and examines each dimension to the relationship with commitment and performances. To verify the proposed research model and test hypotheses, the author selected 200 franchise responses in food and beverage industry. The data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS structural equation modeling program. Results - The empirical findings provide goal incongruity and perceptual differences have a negative effect on the affective commitment, but not the calculative commitment. In addition, affective commitment and calculative commitment are found to have a positive effect on re-contractual intention and extended brand shop running intention, respectively. Affective commitment have a stronger effect on re-contractual intention than calculative commitment. Conclusions - First of all, the fact that goal incongruity and perceptual differences negatively affect the affective commitment, but it does not affect the calculative commitment. It means the relationship commitment in distribution channel are multi-dimensional concept that may be attributed to emotional or affective dimensions but may exist in terms of necessity or power-dependence. Second, the level of relationship commitment such as affective and calculative commitment to franchise headquarters positively affects the re-contractual intention and franchiser's extend brand shop running intention suggest that franchiser should encourage and support existing franchisee's commitment. Third, the fact that affective commitment has a greater effect on relationship performance than calculative commitment means to induce franchisee's affective commitment and to prevent the inconsistency between goals and perceptual differences.

keywords
Franchise System, Composite Incompatibility, Relationship Commitment(Affective Commitment, Calculative Commitment), Relationship Performance

참고문헌

1.

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 18-34.

2.

Anderson, J. C., Häkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1-15.

3.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.

4.

Assael, H. (1968). The political role of trade associations in distributive conflict resolution. Journal of Marketing, 32(2), 21-28.

5.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

6.

Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004). A three-component model of customer to service providers. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 32(3), 234-250.

7.

Clarkin, J. E., & Rosa, P. J. (2005). Entrepreneurial teams within franchise firms. International Small Business Journal, 23(3), 303-334.

8.

Das, T. K. (2006). Strategic alliance temporalities and partner opportunism. British Journal of Management, 17(1), 1-21.

9.

Etgar, M. (1979). Sources and types of intra-channel conflict. Journal of Retailing, 55(1), 61-78.

10.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error:Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 382-388.

11.

Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.

12.

Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E., Scheer, L. K., & Kumar, N. (1996). The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: A trans- Atlantic study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(4), 303-317.

13.

Ghassemzadeh, H., Hojabri, R., Eftekhar, F., & Sharifi, M. (2013). Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Health Industry:Influences of, Personal, Organizational and Social Factors. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(1), 29-35.

14.

Gilliland, D. I., & Bello, D. C. (2002). Two sides to attitudinal commitment: The effect of calculative and loyalty commitment on enforcement mechanisms in distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(1), 24-43.

15.

Gounaris, S. P. (2005). Trust and commitment influences on customer retention: Insights from business-tobusiness services. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 126-140.

16.

Gruen, T. W., Summers, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 34-49.

17.

Hair, J. F., Black. B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education International.

18.

Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). Social exchange in developing relationships: An overview. In R. L. Burgess, & T. L. Huston (eds.). Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 3-28). New York:Academic Press.

19.

Hwang, Jae-Kwang, Yang, In-Seok, & Lee, Yun-Bok (2010). Impact of sales franchisor's relationshiporiented efforts on relationship quality and recontract intentions: From the franchisee perspective. Journal of Franchise Management, 5(2), 25-49.

20.

Kalleberg, A. L., & Reve, T. (1993). Contracts and commitment: Economic and sociological perspectives on employment relations. Human Relations, 46(9), 1103-1132.

21.

Kim, Hyung-Jin, & Yi, Ho-Taek (2016). The effect of franchisor’s business support on franchisee’s trust, multi-dimensional commitments and relational performance. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 21(2), 25-54.

22.

Kim, K., & Frazier, G. L. (1997). Measurement of distributor commitment in industrial channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 40(2), 139-154.

23.

Kim, Sang-Deok (2010). The effects of relationship specific investment and relational capital on relationship learning and performances. Korea Marketing Review, 25(1), 81-106.

24.

Kim, Sung-Soo, Kim, Young-Soo, & Moon, Hye-Young (2009). The relationship of franchisor’s support satisfaction and re-contract intention in food-service industry: Focusing on the moderation effect of types of food business. Journal of Food Service Management, 12(1), 225-243.

25.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, New York: Guilford Press.

26.

Kumar, N., Hibbard, J. D., & Stern, L. W. (1994). The nature and consequences of marketing channel intermediary commitment. Report no. 94-115. Cambridge MA:Marketing Science Institute.

27.

Lee, Haeng-Soon, & Lee, Soo-Bum (2006). The impact of the motivation, support services and brand equity of franchising on the quality of LMX and on the renewal of a contract. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 18(2), 97-115.

28.

Lee, Jang-Rho, & Park, Beom-Soo (1999). A study on the channel power and channel conflict of foreign sales subsidiaries. International Business Journal, 10(1), 225-261.

29.

Lee, Seong-Soo, & Sung, Young-Shin (2001). Consumer commitment in buyer-seller relationship: a multidimensional approach. Korean Journal of consumer and Advertising Psychology, 2(2), 31-60.

30.

Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

31.

Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299-326.

32.

Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314.

33.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitmenttrust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.

34.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

35.

Park, Jung-Min, & Ko, Young-Sub (2010). A study on relationship among cooperation between head office of franchise and its affiliates, service quality and performance. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 23(3), 1399-1416.

36.

Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. (1995). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1), 27-43.

37.

Ruekert, R. W., & Walker Jr, O. C. (1987). Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 1-19.

38.

Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 49-58.

39.

Song, X. M., Xie, J., & Dyer, B. (2000). Antecedents and consequences of marketing managers’ conflicthandling behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 50-66.

40.

Stern, L. W., & El-Ansary, A. I. (1992). Marketing Channels. Dynamics of Competence-based Competition. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

41.

Stern, L. W., El-Ansary, A. I., & Coughlan, A. T. (1996). Marketing Channels, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

42.

Stern, L. W., & Gorman, R. H. (1969). Conflict in distribution channels: An exploration. In L. W. Stern (ed.). Distribution channels: Behavioral dimensions (pp. 156-175). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

43.

Yang, Hoe-Chang, & Ju, Young-Hwang (2011). Positive integration of the franchise system: A new perspective of leadership, followship, trust, and group efficacy. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 1(1), 5-8.

44.

Yi, Ho-Taek, Lee, Joseph, & Dubinsky, A. J. (2010). An empirical investigation of relational conflicts in co-marketing alliances. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 17(3), 249-278.

45.

Yoon, Mahn-Hee, & Kim, Dong-Bok (2008). Multidimensional commitment in B2B exchange relationships:Relational antecedents and intentional consequences. Korean Management Review, 37(5), 1233-1262.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)