바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Analysis on Causal Relationship between Business Startup Education and Entrepreneurial Intention

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.3, pp.27-37
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.3.201703.27
Hwang, Gyu-Sam
Kim, Hye-Sook
Park, Dae-Sub
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The current study analyzes the effect of business startup education on business startup education satisfaction and entrepreneurial intention. Also, it attempts to discover if business startup confidence plays a moderating role between business startup education satisfaction and entrepreneurial intention. Research design, data, and methodology - The survey was conducted for approximately 60 days, from July 20, 2016 to September 20, 2016, and distributed to 300 restaurant founders who started their business through business startup education provided by Korea Food Service Industry Association in Seoul, Kyungki and Incheon or existing business founders. Results - Per multiple regression analysis of business startup education and business startup education satisfaction, among business startup education, all law, entrepreneurship, commercial power analysis, and practical education have significantly positive effect. Per simple regression analysis of business startup education satisfaction and entrepreneurial intention, business startup education has significantly positive effects on entrepreneurial intention. Business startup education satisfaction and business startup confidence interaction show that they do not have a moderating role between business startup education satisfaction and entrepreneurial intention. Conclusions - Setting up theoretical reasoning, this study supports conclusions drawn by prior studies: business startup education has significantly positive effects on business startup education satisfaction and entrepreneurial intention.

keywords
Business Startup Education, Business Startup Education Satisfaction, Entrepreneurial Intention, Confidence

Reference

1.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978.91.90020.

2.

Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

3.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.

4.

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00044-1.

5.

Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Effect and counter-effect of entrepreneurship education and social context on student's intentions. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 24(2), 509-524.

6.

Garavan, T. N., & O'Cinneide, B. (1994). Entrepreneurship education and training programs: A review and evaluation-Part 1. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), 3-12. doi:10.1108/03090599410073505.

7.

Gatewood, E. J., Shaver, K. G., & Gartner, W. B. (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 371-391. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(95)00035-7.

8.

Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53(1), 87-97. doi:10. 2307/1129640.

9.

Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104.

10.

Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411-432. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0.

11.

Matlay, H. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship and education: What is entrepreneurship and does it matter?. Education Training, 47(8), 665-676. doi:10.1108/00400910510633198.

12.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. doi:10.2307/3150499.

13.

Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning:A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(4), 399-424. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x.

14.

Shapero, A. (1981). Self-renewing economics. Economic Development Commentary, 5(Apr.), 19-22.

15.

Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The Social Dimension of Entrepreneurship, in Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, edited by Calvin A. Kent, Donald L. Sexton, and Karl H. Vesper, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

16.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-155. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K.

17.

Vealey, R. S. (1986). Conceptualization of sport confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8(3), 221-246. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsp.8.3.221.

18.

Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M., & Urbano, D. (2005). University students' attitudes towards entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165-182. doi:10. 1007/s11365- 005-1127-5.

19.

Weber, R. (2011). Evaluating Entrepreneurship Education. Munich: Springer.

The Journal of Distribution Science