바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of B2B Transaction Characteristics on Relationship Performance : The moderating Role of Technical Environment Uncertainty

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.4, pp.59-68
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.4.201904.59
Son, Mikyung
Lee, Hyoungtark
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the differential mediating effects of three dimensions of buyer trust in the influence of supplier characteristics on the relationship performance. In this study, transaction characteristics were classified into competences and assets. The corporate reputation is considered as intangible assets, the customer-linking capability is considered among the competencies and transaction specific asset is selected from tangible assets. This study is also to examine the moderating effect of technical environment uncertainty in the effects of integrity and benevolence on the intention to continue trading. This study aims to provide a guide on which dimension suppliers should manage and how to improve their trust in order to maintain business with companies in technical environment uncertainty. Research design, data, and methodology - The data for the empirical analysis of this study were obtained by interviewing the 274 purchasing managers of Daegu - Gyeongbuk small and medium enterprises. The items used in this survey were partially modified to fit the characteristics of the B2B industry. The reliability and validity of the variables were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 programs and hypotheses were verified through the structural equation modeling. Results - In this study, reliability was examined by Cronbach 'α test. Composite Reliability and Average Mean Variance extracted value exceeded the baseline values. As a result of hypotheses testing, the hypothesis that the transaction specific asset will improve the benevolence and that benevolence will improve the intention to continue the transaction were rejected and all the other 9 hypotheses were adopted include 2 moderating hypothesis. Conclusions - This study shows which dimension of trust suppliers should appeal to the buyer according to the uncertainty of the technology environment in order to maintain the transaction with the buyer. competence and integrity are important when technology environment uncertainty is low, and competence and benevolence are important when technical environment uncertainty is high. In order to improve competence, corporate reputation and transaction-specific asset are important. To improve integrity, corporate reputation and customer-linking capability are important. In order to improve benevolence, customer-linking capability is important. And various implications were discussed.

keywords
Relationship Performance, Supplier Characteristics, Technical Environment Uncertainty, Competence, Integrity, Benevolence

Reference

1.

Andaleeb, S. S. (1992). The trust concept: Research issues for channels of distribution. Research in marketing, 11(1), 1-34.

2.

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of marketing research, 29(2), 18-34.

3.

Auster, E. R. (1992). The relationship of industry evolution to patterns of technological linkages, joint ventures, and direct investment between US and Japan. Management Science, 38(6), 778-792.

4.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.

5.

Bennett, R., & Kottasz, R. (2000). Practitioner perceptions of corporate reputation: An empirical investigation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 5(4), 224-235.

6.

Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. (1996). Inter-organizational relationships and information technology: A conceptual synthesis and a research framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 5(2), 84-91.

7.

Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services -growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of marketing science, 23(4), 236-245.

8.

Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.

9.

Choi, C., & Choi, J. (2018). Development and distribution of risk governance framework in terms of socially viable solutions. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 185-193.

10.

Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927.

11.

Davis, T. (1993). Effective supply chain management. Sloan management review, 34(4), 35-46.

12.

Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. the Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-52.

13.

Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 61 (4), 35-51.

14.

Dowling, G. R. (2004). Corporate reputations: Should you compete on yours? California Management Review, 46(3), 19-36.

15.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view:Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.

16.

Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.

17.

Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate reputation review, 1(2), 5-13.

18.

Fynes, B., De Búrca, S., & Marshall, D. (2004). Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(4-5), 179-190.

19.

Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.

20.

Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70-87.

21.

Gefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 33(3), 38-53.

22.

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424.

23.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.

24.

Greyser, S. A. (1999). Advancing and enhancing corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 177-181.

25.

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1988). The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding transaction-specific assets in conventional channels. the Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 20-35.

26.

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.

27.

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? The Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32-44.

28.

Im, K. J., Kim, H. R., & Yang, H. C. (2017). The Effectiveness on the Perception of Service Quality in MRO Transactions. The East Asian Journal of Business Management (EAJBM), 7(4), 11-15.

29.

Kalwani, M. U., & Narayandas, N. (1995). Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships: Do they pay off for supplier firms?. Journal of marketing, 59(1), 1-16.

30.

Keh, H. T., & Xie, Y. (2009). Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial marketing management, 38(7), 732-742.

31.

Khudadad, S., Tahir, M., & Jan, G. (2018). The Comparative Financial Performance of Outsourcing and Vertically Integrated Corporations. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 8 (3), 23-31.

32.

Kim, K., & Frazier, G. L. (1997). On distributor commitment in industrial channels of distribution: A multicomponent approach. Psychology & Marketing, 14(8), 847-877.

33.

Kim, P. J. (2017). The Analysis of the Factors in Customer Trust and Revisit Decision in Traditional Market. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(7), 71-81.

34.

Kwon, I. W. G., & Suh, T. (2005). Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: A path analysis. Supply chain management: An international journal, 10(1), 26-33.

35.

Lancastre, A., & Lages, L. F. (2006). The relationship between buyer and a B2B e-marketplace: Cooperation determinants in an electronic market context. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 774-789.

36.

Liang, C. J., & Wang, W. H. (2005). Integrative research into the financial services industry in Taiwan:Relationship bonding tactics, relationship quality and behavioural loyalty. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 65-83.

37.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.

38.

McDougall, G. H., & Levesque, T. (2000). Customer satisfaction with services: Putting perceived value into the equation. Journal of services marketing, 14(5), 392-410.

39.

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information systems research, 13(3), 334-359.

40.

McKnight D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International journal of electronic commerce, 6(2), 35-59.

41.

Merchant, P., Kumar, A., & Mallik, D. (2017). The Role of Quality of Relations in Succession Planning of Family Businesses in India. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 4(3), 45-56.

42.

Miller, D. (1987). The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8(1), 55-76.

43.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitmenttrust theory of relationship marketing. The journal of marketing, 58(7), 20-38.

44.

Noordewier, T. G., John, G., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 80-93.

45.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.

46.

Oh, S., Dwyer, F. R., & Dahlstrom, R. (1990). External influences on channel relationships: lessons from a negotiation lab. Advances in distribution channel research, 47-91.

47.

Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., Evans, K. R., & Arnold, T. J. (2008). Achieving relationship marketing effectiveness in business-to-business exchanges. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 174-190.

48.

Park, J., Lee, H., & Kim, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 295-302.

49.

Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. (1995). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 24(1), 27-43.

50.

Primo, M. A., & Amundson, S. D. (2002). An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. Journal of Operations management, 20(1), 33-52.

51.

Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation:Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic management journal, 15(S1), 29-44.

52.

Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. the Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.

53.

Schreiner, M., Kale, P., & Corsten, D. (2009). What really is alliance management capability and how does it mpact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1395-1419.

54.

Sharp, B., & Sharp, A. (1997). Loyalty programs and their impact on repeat-purchase loyalty patterns. International journal of Research in Marketing 14 (5), 473-486.

55.

Siguaw, J. A., Baker, T. L., & Simpson, P. M. (2003). Preliminary evidence on the composition of relational exchange and its outcomes: the distributor perspective. Journal of Business Research, 56(4), 311-322.

56.

Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 15-37.

57.

Speckman, P. (1988). Kernel smoothing in partial linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B(Methodological), 50(3), 413-436.

58.

Srinivasan, M., Mukherjee, D., & Gaur, A. S. (2011). Buyer–supplier partnership quality and supply chain performance: Moderating role of risks, and environmental uncertainty. European Management Journal, 29(4), 260-271.

59.

Strahilevitz, M. (2003). The effects of prior impressions of a firm's ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: Do the good look better while the bad look worse? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 77-92.

60.

Su, S., Jeong, Y. J., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, S. W. (2015). Effects of Ethical Management of Retail Enterprises in Korea on Corporate Image and Purchase Intention. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 27-35.

61.

Tan, F. B., & Sutherland, P. (2004). Online consumer trust: a multi-dimensional model. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 2(3), 40-58.

62.

Usman, H. (2015). Customers Trust on Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 2(1), 5-13.

63.

Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility:attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170-180.

64.

Weiss, A. M., & Heide, J. B. (1993). The nature of organizational search in high technology markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (2), 220-233.

65.

Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization:The transaction cost approach. American journal of sociology, 87(3), 548-577.

66.

Yang, S. K., & Shim, J. H. (2018). The Effects of Service Qualities on Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Behavioral Intention in Smartphone Shopping Malls. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(12), 31-43.

67.

Yoo, C. K., Kim, G. P., & Kwon, C. M. (2018). A Study on Brand Trust and Product Attribute of the Convenience Store. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(3), 81-87.

68.

Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. (2004). Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice:A meta-analytical review. Journal of international business studies, 35(6), 524-544.

The Journal of Distribution Science