바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Impact of Price Discount on Perceived Value, Willingness to Buy, and Search Intentions according to the Level of Consumers' Involvement

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2011, v.9 no.1, pp.39-48
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.9.1.201103.39
Yoon, Nam-Soo
Kim, Jae-Yeong
Park, Young-Kyun
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

One of the major reasons for fierce competition among firms is that they strive to increase their own market shares in the same market with similar and apparently undifferentiated products in terms of quality and perceived benefit. Due to such changes in the marketing environment, differentiated after-sales service and diversified promotion strategies have become more important in the race to gain a competitive advantage. Price discount is one of the popular promotion strategies that most retailers use, especially to increase sales, but offering a price discount does not always lead to the expected result. If marketers apply an identical price-promotion strategy without considering the characteristic differences in products and consumer preferences, the discounted price itself may make people skeptical about the quality of the product. Moreover, the changes in perceived value may appear differently depending on factors such as consumer involvement. This implies that variables such as the level of consumer involvement, brand loyalty, and external reference prices, in reality, would have different effects on how consumers perceive the value of price discounts. The variables that affect consumers' perceived values and buying decisions are diverse and complicated. Several studies have examined the effects of such variables as external reference price, selling price, and brand on consumers' perceived value of products. Results have not shown consistent patterns. Therefore, we must note that the factors affecting consumers' value perceptions and buying behaviors are diverse and that the results of studies on the same dependent variable come out differently depending on what that variable is. This study focused on the level of consumer involvement as a salient variable that supposedly affects the perceived value of a product, willingness to buy, and search intentions. We tried to examine whether a price discount affects the perceived value-such as perceived acquisition value and perceived transaction value-in different ways depending on the level of consumer involvement. In addition, we proposed managerial implications that marketers need to consider as a whole, for instance, product attributes, brand loyalty, and involvement and then established a differentiated pricing strategy, case by case, in order to effectively enhance consumers' perceived values. As a result, we found that perceived transaction value positively affects perceived acquisition value and when discounting the price of a high-involvement product enhances the consumer's willingness to buy, but perceived acquisition value does not affect the search intentions significantly. In the case of discounting prices of low-involvement products, on the other hand, the perceived transaction value has a positive effect on the willingness to buy, but the negative effect of perceived acquisition value on the search intentions was not significant. We suppose that people doubt a product's quality because of a declined perceived quality derived from a price discount. Even though the price discount enhanced the transaction value, people eventually increased their level of searching for additional product information. From the results of this study, we suggest that marketers ought to establish an appropriate value-enhancing strategy based on the understanding of which perceived value consumers rely on more when they conduct purchasing behavior because consumers perceive the degree of importance of acquisition value or transaction value differently, depending on their level of involvement.

keywords
관여도, 지각거래가치, 지각획득가치, 구매의향, 탐색의도

Reference

1.

김문정, 조윤기 (2008), “저관여 상품구매의 소비자 행동특성에 관한 연구,” 유통과학연구, 제6권 제2호, 81-93.

2.

김원인, 이은아 (2006), “소비자의 개인적 차이변수가 가치지각, 구매의도, 탐색의도에 미치는 영향,” 관광연구, 제21권 제1호, 61-80.

3.

이성호 (2002), “상표와 세일광고가 구매자의 가치인식과 구매의향에 미치는 영향,” 서울시립대학교산업경영연구소 산경논집, 제17호, 131-136.

4.

Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1992), "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit," Sociological Method and Research, 21(Nov.), 230-258.

5.

Chandrashkaran, R. (2004), "the Influence of Redundant Comparison Prices and Other Price Presentation Formats on Consumers's Evaluations and Purchase Intentions," Journal of Retailing, 80, 55-66.

6.

Chandrashkaran, R. and Grewal, D. (2003), "Assimilation of Advertised Reference Prices: the Moderation Role of Involvement," Journal of Retailing, 79, 53-62.

7.

Della Bitta, Albert J., Monroe, Kent B. and McGinnis, John M. (1981), "Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements," Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), 416-427

8.

Dodds, William B., Monroe, Kent B. and Grewal, Dhruv (1991), "The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations," Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.

9.

Grewal, Dhruv, Monroe,Kent B. and Krishnan, R. (1998), "The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers' Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions", Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59.

10.

Gupta, S. and Cooper, L.G. (1992), "The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds," Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 401-411.

11.

Guttman, L. (1977), What is not what in Statistics, The Statistician, 26, 81-107.

12.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall International.

13.

Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T. and Raj, S. P. (1992), " Asymmetric Responses to Price in Consumer Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decision." Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 387-400.

14.

Laurent, Gilles and Kapferer, Jean-Noёl (1985), "Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles," Journal of Marketing Research, 22(February), 41-53.

15.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, Richard. G. and Burton, Scot (1990), "Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective," Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 54-67.

16.

Marmorstein, Howard, Grewal, Dhruv and Fishe, Raymond P. H. (1992), "The Value of Time Spent in Price Comparison Shopping: Survey and Experimental Evidence," Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), 52-61.

17.

Monroe, Kent B. and Chapman, Joseph D. (1987), “Framing Effects on Buyer's Subjective Product Evaluations," Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 193-197.

18.

Peter, J. Paul and Olson, Jerry C. (1993), Consumer Behavior, IRWIN, 3rd ed.

19.

Raju, P. S. (1977), "Product Familiarity, Brand name, and Price Influences on Product Evaluation," Advances in Consumer Research, 4, 64-71.

20.

Stigler, George J. (1961), "The Economics of Information," Journal of Political Economy, 69(June), 213-225.

21.

Thaler, R. (1985), "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, 4(Summer), 199-214.

22.

Urbany, Joel E. and Bearden, William O. (1990), "The Effects of Advertised Prise Information Value Perceptions," unpublished manuscript, Department of Marketing, University of South Carolina.

23.

Madan, Vibhas and Suri, Rajneesh (2001), "Quality Perception and Monetary Sacrifice: a Comparative Analysis of Discount and Fixed Prices", Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(3), 170-182.

24.

Zaichkowsky, Judith L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct”, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(December), 341-352.

The Journal of Distribution Science