바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The effect of Hangul Phonological Awareness skill on English Orthographic Analogy

Abstract

The present study examined effects of phonological awareness of second graders in the English orthographic analogy paradigm. Experiment 1 studied children who only learned alphabet letter knowledge, and experiment 2 studied the same children who learned English word reading for fifteen sessions. 44 second graders were divided into two classes(High and Low of phonological awareness level) after they were tested on Hangul phonological awareness and participated in English word reading class after school. In experiment 1, studying children after completion of alphabet letter knowledge lessons found that although high and low PA groups showed a slight difference in increase in number of words read correctly among the groups, for body-coda unit and rimes, as well as vowel including texts the increase was significant. In experiment 2 investigated after completion of English word reading lessons found that the high PA group showed a significant increase in number of words read correctly for body-coda unit and rimes, as well as vowel, but the low PA group showed significant progress only for body-coda unit. The findings show that Hangul PA is transferred into English word reading, and orthographic recognition units are different in English word reading according to the level of Hangul PA.

keywords
Submission Date
2007-01-15
Revised Date
2007-02-16
Accepted Date
2007-02-17

Reference

1.

이광오 (1991). 한글 필기행동의 연구. 인간과 기계와 언어, 3, 139-149.

2.

이광오 (1993). 한글 글자의 내부구조와 글자인지과정. 실험 및 인지심리학회 여름 연구회, 15-20

3.

이차숙 (1999). 유아의 음운인식과 읽기 능력과의 관계에 관한 연구. 교육학 연구, 37(1) pp. 389-406.

4.

윤혜경 (1997). 아동의 한글 읽기 발달에 관한 연구: 자소-음소 대응규칙의 터득을 중심으로. 부산대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

5.

윤혜경, 권오식 (1998). 영어가 모국어인 성인의 인공철자로써 한글학습 초기에서 자소-음소 대응과정. 한국심리학회지, 11(2), 74-87.

6.

한찬숙, 이춘재 (2003). 한국아동의 음운인식 패턴과 영어 단어 해독과의 관계 . 한국심리학회지: 발달, 16, 259-272.

7.

Adams, M. J.(1990). Beginning to read: Cambridge, MA:Bradford.

8.

Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers' use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108-133.

9.

Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read-a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.

10.

Bruce, D. J. (1964). The analysis of word sound by young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 158-170.

11.

Burgess, S. R., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a preschool sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 117-141.

12.

Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805-812.

13.

Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children's phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1-30.

14.

Cisero, C. A., & Royer, J. M. (1995). The development and cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 275-303.

15.

Coltheart, M (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed), strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.

16.

Comeau, L., Cormier, P., Grandmaison, E., & Lacroix, D. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 29-43.

17.

Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 43-465.

18.

Ehri, L. C. (1983). A critique of five studies on letter-name knowledge and learning to read. In L. Mj. Gentile, M. L. Kamil, & J. S. Blanchard(Eds.), Reading research revisited (pp. 131-153). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

19.

Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J.L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

20.

Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1980). Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 115-120.

21.

Gayane, M., Arturo, H. (2002). Is native-language decoding skill related to second0language learning: Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 14-22.

22.

Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic Knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.

23.

Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.

24.

Goswami, U. (1990). A special link between rhyming skill and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 301-311.

25.

Goswami, U. (1991). Learning about spelling sequences: The role of onsets and rimes in analogies in reading. Child Development, 62, 1110-1123.

26.

Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental child psychology, 56, 443-475.

27.

Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530-542.

29.

Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.

30.

Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.

31.

Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201-212.

32.

Lindsey, K. A., Manis, F. R. & Bailey, C. E.(2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 482-494.

33.

Lundberg, I., Frost, J.,& Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive programme for stimulating phonological awareness in pre-school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 163-284.

34.

Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159-173.

35.

Mann, V. A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 117-136.

36.

Marsh, G., Desberg, P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Developmental strategies in reading. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 9, 391-394.

37.

Nation, K., Allen, R. & Hulme, C. (2001). The limitations of orthographic analogy in early reading development: Performance on the clue-word task depends on phonological priming and elementary decoding skill, not the use of orthographic analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 75-94.

38.

Penny, C., Siegel, L. S. (1999). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition in English-and Punjabi-speaking Canadian children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 20-28.

39.

Peterson, M. E., & Haines, L. P. (1992). Orthographic analogy training with kindergarten children: Effects on analogy use, phonemic segmentation, and letter sound knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 109-127.

40.

Savage, R. S. (1997). Do children need concurrent prompts in order to use lexical analogies in reading? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 235-246.

41.

Treiman, R., & Baron, J. (1981). Segmental analysis ability: Development and relation to reading ability. In G. E. Mackinnon & T. G. Waller(Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice Vol. 3, 159-198. New York: Academic Press.

42.

Treiman, R. (1983). The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games, Cognition, 15, 49-74.

43.

Treiman, R. (1985). Phonemic awareness and spelling : Children's judgements do not always agree with adults'. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 182-201.

44.

Treiman, R., & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic -analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory & Cognition, 11, 382-389.

45.

Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., Rodriguez, K., Mouzaki, A., & Frances, D. J. (1998). The foundation of literacy : Learning the sounds of letter. Child Development, 69, 1524-1540.

46.

Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, Phonological awareness and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321-363.

47.

Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.

48.

Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.

logo