바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Perceived difficulties in communication and personality characteristics

Abstract

This study examined gender difference in the perceived difficulties in communication and personality characteristics and the relation between the two variables. The significant gender difference in the perceived difficulties in communication and personality characteristics was found. The correlation analysis revealed the perceived difficulties in the same-sex communication have negative correlation with extraversion, agreeableness and faithfulness and the positive correlation with neuroticism in male and female. But in the opposite-sex one while male has negative correlation with extraversion, agreeableness, faithfulness, and openness to experiences and positive correlation with neuroticism, female has the negative correlation with neuroticism and positive correlation with extraversion. MANOVA revealed significant difference in the pattern of personality characteristics according to the level of the perceived difficulties in communication.

keywords
Submission Date
2007-01-15
Revised Date
2007-02-16
Accepted Date
2007-02-17

Reference

1.

노동부(2000). 직업선호도검사 실시요람. 노동부 중앙고용정보관리소.

2.

안선경, 허경호(2004). 개인의 성격과 의사소통 능력간의 관계. 한국언론학보, 48(2), 321-472.

3.

장휘숙(2002). 여성심리학. 박영사

4.

최영임, 장휘숙(2006). 성과 성역할 정체감 및 성격특성이 의사소통 어려움 지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 19(2), 77-91.

5.

Edwards, R. (1998). The effects of gender, gender role, and values on the interpretation of messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(1), 52-71.

6.

Edwards, R. (2000). Interpreting relational meanings: The influence of sex and gender-role. Communication Research Reports, 17(1), 13-21.

7.

Edwards, R., Bello, R., Brandau-Brown, F., & Hollems, D. (2001). The effects of loneliness and verbal aggressiveness on message interpretation. Southern communication Journal, 66, 139-150.

8.

Edwards, R., & Hamilton, M. A. (2004). You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen's model of gender and communication. Sex Roles, 50(7/8), 491-504.

9.

Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Readings in extraversion-introversion: Volume Ⅰ. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

10.

Eysenck, H. J. (1971). Readings in extraversion-introversion: Volume Ⅱ. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

11.

Keaten, J., Kelly, L. A., Begnal, C., Heller, D., & Walker, A. (1993). Development of an instrument to measure reticence. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL, USA.

12.

Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity. 196-216. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

13.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.

14.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

15.

McCroskey, J. C., Ralph, C. C., & Barrick, J. E. (1970). The effect of systematic desensitization on speech anxiety. Speech Teacher, 19, 32-36.

16.

Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1989). An investigation of self-perceived communication competence and personality orientations. Communication research reports, 6, 28-36

17.

Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction. 165-188. New York: Oxford University Press.

logo