바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

이전 다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.12 No.9

Citation Share

Evaluation of Functionality and Added Value Factors to the Usage of Mobile Telecommunication Services

Evaluation of Functionality and Added Value Factors to the Usage of Mobile Telecommunication Services

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.9, pp.65-72
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.9.201409.65
Kim, An-Sik (Dept. of Service Management, Jang An University)
Oh, Young-Sam (Dept. of Distribution Management, Jang An University)
Kim, An-Sik, & Oh, Young-Sam. (2014). Evaluation of Functionality and Added Value Factors to the Usage of Mobile Telecommunication Services. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 12(9), 65-72, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.9.201409.65

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to provide a brief understanding of usability and its extended models with TAM as well as identifying additional determinants that had been suggested in previous studies on mobile services. Research design, data, and methodology - Empirical data were collected by conducting a field survey of potential mobile application service users. The call for participation was also made in mobile related application issues, which were widely discussed. Result - The ease of use and usefulness had a significantly positive influence on attitude and intention. It also was revealed that added value services can offer practical value to customers. Thus, positive attitudes toward the adoption of services by customers are present when they perceive higher usefulness and ease of use of mobile application services. Conclusion - It was indicated that customers who are more inclined to try new products or who have a higher demand for new things tend to think about those functionalities and added value mobile application services from the perspective of usefulness and ease of use and operation.

keywords
Mobile Service, Functionality, Added value services, Technology Acceptance Model

참고문헌

1.

Brereton, E. (2005). Don't neglect usability in the total cost of ownership. Communications of the ACM, 47(7), 10-11.

2.

Bouwman, H., Bejar, A., & Nikou, S. (2012). Mobile services put in context: AQ-sort analysis. Telematics and Informatics. 29(1), 66–81.

3.

Carlsson, C.. Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., & Puhakainen, J. (2006). Adoption of mobile devices/services-Searching for answers with the UTAUT. HICSS Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 6, 132-141.

4.

Chuttur M. Y. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems. 9(37), 1-21.

5.

Davis F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3), 319-340.

6.

Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J. & Zmijewska, A. (2007). Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 7(2), 165–181.

7.

Dillon, A. (2001). Beyond usability: Process, outcome, and affect in human-computer interactions. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science. 26( 4), 57-69.

8.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

9.

Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1), 39–50.

10.

Gioug, O., Dooyeon, K., & Sungyul, R. (2006). Selection of the success factors of mobile commerce and evaluation us ing AHP. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 6(7), 127–134.

11.

Hair, J. T. Anderson, R. E. Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (3rd ed.), New York, NY: Macmillan.

12.

Holden R. J., & Karsh B. T. (2010). Methodological review the Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomed Inform. 43(1),159-172.

13.

Johnson, D., & Wiles, J. (2003). Effective affective user interface design in games. Ergonomics, 46, 1332-1345.

14.

Jung, Myung-Hee, Bae, Dong-In, & Yun, Jae-Chul (2014), The Effects of SNS Characteristics on Purchase Intention. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(3), 19-25

15.

Kim, Yong-Min, Kireyeva, Anel A., & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2014). Effects of SNS Characteristics upon Consumers’Awareness, Purchase Intention, and Recommendation. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 5(1), 27-37.

16.

Legris P., Ingham J., & Collerette P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information Managemant. 40(3), 191-204.

17.

Liang, T. P., & Yeh, Y. H. (2011). Effect of use contexts on the continuous use of mobile services: The case of mobile games. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 15(2), 187–196.

18.

Moore G. C., & Benbasat I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research. 2(3), 192–222.

19.

Nielsen, J. (1996). Usability metrics: tracking interface improvement, IEEE Software. 13(6), 12-14.

20.

Nikou S., & Mezei, J. (2013). Evaluation of mobile services and substantial adoption factors with Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Telecommunications Policy. 37, 915–929.

21.

Oh, Young Sam(2013). Study on the Effect of the Usability and Usefulness of Mobile Application Programs on Buying Intention. Journal of Distribution Science. 11(11), 41-47.

22.

Oh, Young sam, & Choi, Tae Sung (2010). Usability considerations in Quality of Service Metrics for Mobile Service Quality. Journal of Service Management, 11(2), 167-191.

23.

Oh, Young Sam, and Kim, Moon Hong (2013). A Study of Relationship between Attitude and Purchasing Intention in Mobile Network Services. Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review, 16(5), 55-64.

24.

Oh, Young Sam, & Lee, Young Chul (2012). An Exploratory Study of the Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Buying Intention in Mobile Service. Journal of Distribution Science. 10(9), 23-29.

25.

Pedersen, P. E. (2005). Adoption of mobile Internet services: An exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 15(3), 203–222.

26.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations(4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.

27.

Schierz P. G., Schilke O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding customer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electron Commer RA. 9(3), 209-216.

28.

Venkatesh V., & Davis F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Science. 46(2), 186-204.

29.

Venkatesh V., & Bala H. (2008), Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Science. 39(2), 273-315.

30.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology:Toward a unified view. MIS Quart, 27(3), 425-478.

31.

Wu, Y. L., Tao, Y. H., & Yang, P. C. (2008). The use of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to confer the behavioral model of 3G mobile telecommunication users. Journal of Statistics Manage Systems. 11(5), 919–949.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책