바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Evaluating Policy Priorities in Small Agricultural Cooperatives for Distribution Systems

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.12, pp.65-71
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.12.201512.65
Kim, Chang-Hwan
Hwnag, Dae-Yong
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Domestic cooperatives tend to increase during the establishment of cooperatives and gradually through the basic law of social needs. However, only cooperatives' qualitative grow this secured without blessings, and their quantitative growth through government support is questionable. The purpose of this study is to analyze the agricultural cooperatives established through the Distribution System Cooperatives Basic Law, which was enacted in January 2012. Subsequently, establishing agricultural cooperatives was done briskly. However, cooperatives established rapidly after the founding of the Basic Law encountered problems. Research design, data, and methodology - To assess the performance of selected agricultural cooperatives, data were analyzed using the methodological Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. The AHP is a set of systematic procedures to hierarchically analyze the elements of any problem. Using a survey on expertise, a series of comparative determinations of each pair is performed to evaluate the relative strengths and the strengths of the impact between elements within the hierarchy. A survey was conducted on 10 small agricultural cooperatives using AHP analysis for the examination. The purpose of such research and analysis is to recommend a direction for future policies aimed at small agricultural cooperatives. Result - This study applied three types of policy evaluation criterion, including market expansions, organizations, and cooperative projects, and 12 types of small agricultural cooperative policy measures. Market expansion policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four categories: school meals, direct transactions, shopping malls, and wholesale markets. Organizational policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four types: existing sales channel management, education, preventing free riding, and enlarging members. Cooperative project policies in agricultural cooperatives are classified into four policy areas: cooperation between cooperatives, community contribution, joint businesses, and government links. In this paper, the growth priority in agricultural cooperative policies is analyzed by applying policy evaluation criteria on the basis of a survey on expertise. The priorities of the policy program are also analyzed using a decision analytic hierarchy process. The results indicate that market expansion is the most important policy evaluation criterion therefore, improving direct transactions, school meals, management of existing sales channels, and shopping malls are crucial policy measures. In contrast, the cooperation of cooperatives, expansion of union members, and cooperation with the government were found to have low priority. Conclusions - Agricultural cooperatives should develop plans as follows. Small agricultural cooperatives need to secure school meals and direct transactions for market expansion, restructure marketing strategies to manage existing sales channels, and, finally, increase education and training for sustainable organizational development. This study has the following limitations. Because the subject of the investigation is a new cooperative, determining its sustainable growth is difficult. Therefore, through analysis and a continuous study of cooperatives, future research is expected to show that modifying the direction of agriculture cooperatives is necessary.

keywords
Agricultural cooperative, Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP), Priority of Policy

Reference

1.

Choi, Kyung-Sik, Nam, Gi-Pou, & Hwang, Dae-Yong (2014). Status and Characteristics of the newly Established Cooperatives in Agricultural Sector. Journal of Agricultural Extension Community Development, 21(4), 967-1006

2.

Kim, Chang-Hwan, & Park, Joo-Sub (2014). A Study on Activating a Producing Organization by Analyzing the Difference. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(12), 65-74.

3.

Kim, Chang-Hwan, & Park, Sung-Ho (2015), The Effect of Environment-Friendly Certifications on Agricultural Producer Organizations. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(6), 97-104.

4.

Kim, Chang-Hwan, & Wi, Tae-Seok (2014). A Study on Producing Organization through Analysis on the Activation of Classifications. Korean Journal of Food Marketing, 31(4), 1-19.

5.

Kim, Jeong-Seop (2014). Trends of Cooperatives Establishment in Rural Korea and Improvement of Legislation. Journal of Agricultural Extension Community Development, 21(1), 1-34.

6.

Kim, Kyung-Hwan, & Wi, Tae-Seok (2014). A Study on the Improvement of the Agricultural Wholesale Market Logistics. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 41(4), 837-859.

7.

Kim, Tae-Hwan, Kim, Chul-Wook, & Kang, Yang-Su (2010). A Priority of Regional Agricultural Policy using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Changnyeong. The Korean Society of international Agriculture, 22(1), 8-14.

8.

Kwon, Hyog-In, Na, Yun-Bin, & Lee, Seung-Ha (2014). Characteristics and Core Task of Domestic Cooperatives for the Sustainable Ecosystem Planning. The Korean Journal of Cooperative Studies, 32(3), 59-89.

9.

Lee, Jin-Hong, Jung, Gu-Hyun, & Seo, Myeong-Whoon (2008). Priority setting for Distributors of Sprout and Baby Vegetable Producing Farms using AHP. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 35(4), 849-870.

10.

Na, Ran-Hee, Yoon, Yong-Cheol, & Kim, Young-Joo (2010). Accomplishment Analysis of the Rural Traditional Theme Village by AHP Method. Journal of Agriculture Life Science, 44(4), 57-68.

11.

Nemoto, Masazuku (2014). Improvement Strategy for Local Food Management through Social Economy Network. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 18(1), 57-73.

12.

Roh, Jae-Sun, Ahn, Young-Seob, & Kim, Kyu-Ho (2013). Evaluating the Priority of Policy in Medicinal Crop Industry by AHP Method. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 40(2), 491-510.

13.

Satty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

14.

Satty, T. L. (1990). How to make a Decision the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26

15.

Yeom, Chan-hee (2014). Exploring Sustainability of Co-operative Communities: A Case Study of Saskatchewan in Canada. The Korean Journal of Cooperative Studies, 32(2), 151-177.

The Journal of Distribution Science