바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

전자상거래 평가모형에 관한 연구 : 인터넷 비즈니스모델을 중심으로

Study on E-commerce Evaluation Model : Focused on "Internet Business Model"

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.1, pp.85-91
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.1.201601.85
이영민 (Hyupsung University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - Recently, the importance of rapid change in business models is more and more increasing as the change of information technology environment. Therefore, a variety of business models have emerged. On the other hand, there is no company that can generate revenue. Many enterprises are still maintained while they are changing only their appearance of the business model. Business model is important in e-commerce. However, a lot of researches are targeted only in Web sites. Thus, e-commerce companies do not have the infrastructure for measuring and business models. The purpose of paper is to evaluate factors which are related with the structuring of the e-commerce success. And it proposed a financial items and non-financial items. From the perspectives of administrators and managers, the paper researches the possibility for E-Commerce Evaluation Model as a valuable criteria in measuring business model. Research design, data and methodology - The methods are taken by the classification for the type of business-to-business transactions, transactions subject, and the degree of integration and innovation capabilities. Financial and Non-financial value is used to build E-Commerce Evaluation Model. Evaluation items in Administration's perspective are composed with enhance the effectiveness of the mission, improving efficiency of the administration, and control of costs. Evaluation items in the customer's perspective were measured by customer participation and cooperation with customer Satisfaction. In the case of researching the information system's perspective, three criteria are used such as adequacy of the development process, improvement of the quality of service, and maintenance of standardized information technology. In researching for the ICT competence's perspective, evaluation items were composed of enhanced user capabilities, utilizing new technologies, and empowerment of information workers. Results - In this paper, E-Commerce Evaluation Model with financial and non-financial perspectives shows the possibility to be criteria in the case of measuring business model. Moreover, it gives the positive expectation to be successful criteria. But the research may have ambiguity in its essential concept because it cannot avoid the limitation in selecting evaluation tools from merely the model. It is impossible to exclude the possibility in omitting specific properties which may take place in actual case study. Therefore, In hereafter research, it is necessary to include actual case study research in selecting evaluation tools in order to improve the limit point. Actual measurement items which are derived from actual case study should be subdivided, and it would be more effective to complete the research. Conclusions - In rapid change in business models, there are various kinds of business models. But it is general situation that companies which adopted business models have not brought in revenue. For this reason, E-Commerce Evaluation Model is needed as an important factor for the structuring of the e-commerce success. Although it has the limitation in selecting evaluation tools from model, E-Commerce Evaluation Model proposes the implication for measuring business models as a valuable criteria.

keywords
E-commerce, Business Models, Revenue Generation, Evaluation Model

참고문헌

1.

Baatz, E. B. (1996). Will Your Business Model Float?. Web Master Magazine, Oct. Retrieved August 22, 2014, from http://www.cio.com/archive/webbusiness/100196.sub.

2.

Bambury, Paul (1998). A Taxonmy of Internet Commerce, First Monday, 10(3). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v3i10.624, Retrieved August 22, 2014, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/624

3.

Charnes, A, Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

4.

Joo, Jae-Hun (2004). The Model and Society of online Business Based on Customer value: Value Factors Affecting Customer’s Reuse intention. Korean Academic Society of Business Administration, 33(4), 1157-1184 .

5.

Kang, Hwang-seon (2005). Research for the settlement of the Balanced Scorecard within government organizations. Korean Public Administration Review, 14(3), 3-38.

6.

Kim, Eun-sun, & Yoon, San-go (2001). An Application of Q-Methodology in Selecting Evaluation Criteria for Information Projects. The Korean Association for Local Government Studies, 5(4), 207-226.

7.

Kim, Sang-Hoon, & Choi, Jeom-Ki (2006). Development of Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Model for Inorganization Program in Public Sector. Korean Corporation Management Association, 13(1), 195-219.

8.

Lincke, D. (1998). Evaluating Integrated Electronic Commerce Systems. Electronic Markets, 8(1), 7-11.

9.

Sawhney, M., & Kaplan, S. (1999). The B-to-B Boom, Business 2.0. Retrieved 22 September, 2014, from http://www.pearsoned.ca/highered/divisions/text/cyr/reading s/SawhneyT1P1R2.pdf

10.

Timmers, Paul (1998). Business Models for Electronic Markets. Int J Electronic Markets, 98(2), 4-9.

11.

Wilder, Clinton (1999). E-Business: What's The Model?. Information Week, 26 July, 47-54.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)