바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

스마트폰을 대상으로 한 휴리스틱 및 프로스펙트 효과 분석: 프레이밍, 보유효과 및 조절초점 이론을 중심으로

Analysis of the Heuristic Theory and the Prospect Theory for Smartphones: Focusing on Framing, Endowment Effect and Regulatory Focus Theory

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.12, pp.99-105
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.12.201612.99
김순홍 (Division of international trade, Incheon National University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - In the present study, it has become the most important necessity in our daily lives that consumers' psychological factors affect the use of smartphones, and it has been analyzed through behavioral economic approaches. In this respect, the present study is intended to apply the heuristic theory and the prospect theory among behavioral economics theories to examine how psychological factors affect consumers' product selection. Research design, data, and methodology - In the present study, using smartphone repurchase as a dependent variable, whether regulatory focus effects have interaction effects on behavioral economic theories and behavioral economic effects such as possession (ownership) effects, framing effects, and brand recollection. As an analysis method, questionnaire surveys conducted with university students in Incheon were examined through Two-Way ANOVAs using the SPSS23 package. Results - The analysis from the results are as follows. Using smartphone repurchase as a dependent variable, the main effects and interaction effects on two variables; satisfaction difference with product functions and positive framing variable were statistically significant. Using repurchase as a dependent variable was statistically significant, there was no interaction effect between the two variables; satisfaction difference with product functions and the difference of brands in possession. Using smartphone repurchase as a dependent variable, interaction effects on two variables; satisfaction difference with product functions and the lengths of product possession periods were not statistically significant. The results from the analyses of interaction effects of brand recollection and brands type were statistically significant in possession using repurchase as a dependent variable. The results from the analyses of the main effect of the brands type were statistically significant in possession using repurchase as a dependent variable. Conclusions - The implication of the present study is that it suggests the factors that became important for customers' smartphone purchase following the change in the meaning of smartphones from practical products in the past to hedonic products. Limitations of the present study are first, the study subjects are limited to students and the number of copies in questionnaires is only approximately 130, which is insufficient, so that the present study is not sufficient as a study for entire smartphone users.

keywords
Behavioral Economics, Heuristic, Prospect, Framing, Brand Recollection

참고문헌

1.

Ajzen, Icek, & Fishbein, Martin (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), Sep. 888-918.

2.

Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.

3.

Gallup Korea (2016). Result of Smartphone Brand being used. Seoul, Korea: Gallup Korea.

4.

Higgins, E. Tory, & Spiegel, Scott (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In Vohs, Kathleen D., & Roy F. Baumeister (ed.). Handbook of self-regulation:Research, theory and applications, New York:Guilford Press, 171-187.

5.

Kahneman, Daniel, & Amos, Tversky (1973). On the Psychology of Prediction. Psychological Review , 80, 237-251.

6.

Kahneman, Daniel, & Amos, Tversky (1984). Choice, Values and Frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.

7.

Kim, Sung-Jae, & Yu, Ming-Ji (2010). Effects of Message Framing on the Advertising Effectiveness -Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus and Product Type. Journal of Korea Contents, 10(8), 177-185.

8.

Korea Information Society Development Institute (2014). Korea Media Panel Research. Seoul, Korea: Korea Information Society Development Institute.

9.

Lee, Kyu-Hyun, & Kim, Kyung-Jin (2014). Korean Culture and Behavioral Economics. The Journal of Culture Industry , 14(1), 91-101.

10.

Lee, Jin-Yong (2010). An Overview of Behavioral Decision Theory (BDT) in Consumer Behavior: Focusing on 2000-2009 Korean Studies. The Journal of Consumer. 21(2), 193-213.

11.

Liverman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Choices between Stability and Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77(6), 1135-1145.

12.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.

13.

Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.

14.

Song, In-Hak, & Park, Sea-Young (2009). Advertisement Effects of Message Framing and Temporal Frame. Social science of Chungnam University , 20(3), 129-150.

15.

Strahilevitz, Michal A., & Loewenstein, George (1998). The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 276–289.

16.

Thaler, Richard H. (1980). Toward a positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.

17.

Tomono, Norio (2008). Behavioral Economics . Seoul, Korea: Jihyung. .

18.

Tversky, Amos, & Kahneman, Daniel (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Bises. Science, 211, 453-458.

19.

Won, Jee-Sung (2013). A Critical Review on Behavioral Economics with a Focus on Prospect Theory and EBA Model. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(5), 63-76.

20.

Yeo, Jun-Sang (2007). Moderating Role of Self Regulatory Focus in Effect of Comparison Type on Brand Attitude. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 18(5), 339-349.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)