- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
The Need for Updating the Survey Population of Traditional Market
Kim, Young-Ki
Kim, Seung-Hee
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - Statistics of Traditional Market is the only source of information on traditional markets, shopping street, and underground shopping street. The government conducts a survey of traditional market conditions every year to look at the current status of traditional markets and provide effective support. Therefore, this study examines the necessity and validity of updating about the Survey Population of Traditional Market Research design, data, and methodology - This study investigated the necessity of updating about the Survey Population of Traditional Market through literature review. Therefore this study examined the necessity of the current population based on the review of the population related to the sample design, methods, and the sampling frame. Next, we examined the change patterns of the population and the sample by dividing the population and sample of the current survey of the traditional market survey into the market unit, the store unit within the market, and finally the individual store unit. Results - As a result, the population of traditional market changes about 4~6%. Next, the analysis of the store unit in the market shows that the number of stores is very variable even though the market is continuously included in the survey target. Finally, as a result of examining the characteristics of individual stores, the stores with less than one year were more than 6% of the total surveyed stores based on the traditional market. These results are generally inconsistent with the idea that stores in traditional markets will operate for a long time in one place. Next, we proposed the establishment of a management system, applying Citizen Generated Data, and circulation survey. Additionally, this study proposes to change the stratification variables at the regional level rather than the market unit. Conclusions - Therefore, in this study, it is suggested that a current population of traditional market is needed updating, and that a population survey should be updated at least four years. In addition, a system for investigating traditional markets and districts was established and a circulation survey was proposed for efficient use of budgets. Based on these research results and policy suggestions, the future research directions are suggested.
- keywords
- Traditional Market, Survey Population, Sampling Frame
Reference
Alexander, C. H. (2002). Still rolling: Leslie Kish's "rolling samples" and the american community survey. Survey Methodology, 28(1), 35-42.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61 (8), 1139-1160.
Brick, J. M. (2011). The future of survey sampling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 872-888.
Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Froehlich, H. E., Schmidt, N., Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., HilleRisLambers, J. Tewksbury, J., & Parrish, J. K. (2017). The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208, 113-120.
Cavallo, S., Lynch, J., & Scull, P. (2014). The digital divide in citizen-initiated government contacts: a gis approach. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4), 77-93.
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A metaanalysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821-836.
Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464-494.
Couper, M. P., & De Leeuw, E. D. (2003). Nonresponse in cross-cultural and cross-national Surveys. In Harkness, J. A., van de Vijver, F. J., Mohler, P. P., &Wiley, J. Cross-cultural survey methods (pp.157-177), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Press.
Cox, T. E., Philippoff, J., Baumgartner, E., & Smith, C. M. (2012). Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven intertidal monitoring program. Ecological Applications, 22(4), 1201-1212.
De Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (2008). The cornerstones of survey research. International handbook of survey methodology. In De Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., & Dillman, D. International handbook of survey methodology (pp.1-17), New York, US: Routledge Press.
Deming, W. E. (1990). Sample design in business research. New York, US: John Wiley & Sons Press.
Dey, E. L. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighting adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 38 (2), 215-227.
Faugier, J., & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(4), 790-797.
Groves, R. M. (2004). Survey errors and survey costs. New York, US: John Wiley & Sons Press.
Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error:past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849-879.
Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(4), 475-495.
Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology. New York, US: John Wiley &Sons Press.
Kalton, G., & Graham, K. (1983). Introduction to California, US: Sage Publication. survey sampling.
Kim, Y. K., Kang, H. S., & Kim, S. H. (2012). A study of efficient measures for installing and managing traditional market arcades. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(3), 15-30.
Kim, Y. K., Kim, S. H., & Lim, J. (2011a). A study on the meaning & classification of conventional markets. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(2), 83-95.
Kim, Y. O., Byun, C. G., & Ryu, T. C. (2011b). A study on the current fire insurance subscription and solutions for ensuring the safety of the traditional market. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(4), 43-50.
Kish, L. (1998). Space/time variations and rolling samples. Journal of Official Statistics, 14(1), 31-46.
Lee, C. S. (2019). The effects of traditional market support projects and competition intensity of stores on store sales and number of visitors. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(3), 95-103.
Lee, C. S., Kim, J. H. Kim, Y. K., & Kim, S. H. (2018). A study on retail competition structure in traditional market. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(6), 55-63.
Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Legg, J. C., & Fuller, W. A. (2009). Two-phase sampling. In Pfeffermann, D., & Rao, C. R. Handbook of statistics, sample surveys: Design, methods and applications (pp.55-70), Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Press.
Lim, J. Kim, Y. K., Lee, M. K., Kim, Y. O., & Youn, M. K. (2011). Consideration of the traditional marketrelated law revision plan: Focus on moranjang in seongnam. Journal of Distribution Science, 9 (2), 37-47
Lohr, S. L. (2009). Multiple-frame surveys. In Pfeffermann, D., & Rao, C. R. Handbook of statistics, sample surveys: Design, methods and applications (pp.71-88), Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Press.
Lohr, S. L. (2012). Coverage and sampling. In De Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., & Dillman, D. International handbook of survey methodology (pp.97-112), New York, US: Taylor & Francis Press.
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526.
Neyman, J. (1934). On the two different aspects of the representative method: The method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97 (4), 558-625.
Pennell, B. E., Deshmukh, Y., Kelley, J., Maher, P., Wagner, J., & Tomlin, D. (2014). Disaster research:Surveying displaced populations. In Tourangeau, R., Edwards, B., Johnson, T. P., Bates, N., & Wolter, K. M., Hard-to-survey populations (pp.111-133), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Small Enterprise and Market Service (2019). Statistics of traditional market in 2017. Daejeon, Korea: Small Enterprise and Market Service Press.
Tye, C. A., McCleery, R. A., Fletcher Jr, R. J., Greene, D. U., & Butryn, R. S. (2017). Evaluating citizen vs. professional data for modelling distributions of a rare squirrel. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2), 628-637.
Van Auken, P. M., Hammer, R. B., Voss, P. R., & Veroff, D. L. (2006). The american community survey in counties with “seasonal” populations. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(3), 275-292.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations