바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Adolescents’ social dominance goals and social adjustment behaviors: The moderating role of friendship quality

Abstract

The current study examined the main and moderating effects of adolescents’ social goals and friendship quality on social adjustment behavior. Social goals (i.e., intimacy, popularity, and dominance) and friendship quality (i.e., positive and negative) were assessed in a sample of fifth and sixth graders and used to predict their social adjustment behavior (i.e., physical and relational aggression, bullying, prosocial behavior, and isolation). The results indicated that intimacy goals negatively predicted relational aggression and bullying. Social dominance goals positively predicted aggression, bullying, and isolation, and negatively predicted prosocial behavior. In addition, positive friendship quality negatively predicted physical aggression and isolation, whereas negative friendship quality positively predicted aggression and bullying. Results also found evidence of moderating effects, such that positive friendship quality mitigated the level of physical aggression for youth who had high social dominance goals. These findings emphasize the importance of considering social goals in tandem with their friendship quality to better understand adolescents’ social adjustment behavior.

keywords
Submission Date
2020-10-09
Revised Date
2020-11-15
Accepted Date
2020-11-24

Reference

1.

신희영 (2018c). 종단적 사회연결망 분석을 통해 살펴본 청소년의 관계 지배적 목표가 공격 행동의 또래 상호 작용에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 15(3), 307-329.

2.

신희영 (2019b). 청소년의 학업-사회적 행동 프로파일 중심으로 살펴본 또래 지위와 학업 규범이 행동 발달에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:발달, 32(2), 171-191.

3.

신희영 (2020a). 청소년이 닮고 싶어하는 또래는 누구인가? 또래 지위 지표로서의 선망도 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 33(1), 19-35.

4.

이승연 (2011). 초등학생의 공격성과 사회적 선호도, 지각된 인기도의 관계: 친사회적 행동과 사회적 유능성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 8(2), 153-173.

5.

Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

6.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.

7.

Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 7-10.

8.

Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66(5), 1312-1329.

9.

Bolger, K. E., Patterson, C. J., Kupersmidt, J. B. (1998). Peer relationships and selfesteem among children who have been maltreated. Child Development, 69(4), 1171-1197.

10.

Buhrmester, D. (1996). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence, and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In W. Bukowski, A. Newcomb, & W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 158-185). New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Gest, S. D., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). A brief method for assessing social development: Structure,reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the interpersonal competence scale. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 33(6), 725-736.

12.

Caravita, S. C. S., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 376-395.

13.

Chung, T., & Asher, S. (1996). Children’s goals and strategies in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 125-147.

14.

Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 14 (2), 102-105.

15.

Cillessen, A. H. N., & van den Berg, Y. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135-164). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

16.

Crick, N., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101.

17.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determinationof behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

18.

Dishion, T. J., Piehler, T. F., & Myers, M. W. (2008). Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer contagion. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 72-93). New York: Guilford.

19.

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.

20.

Gauze, C., Bukowski, W. M., Aquan-Assee, J, Sippola, L. K. (1996). Interactions between family environment and friendship and associations with self-perceived wellbeing during early adolescence. Child Development, 67(5), 2201-2216.

21.

Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control inearly adolescence: A case for the welladapted Machiavellian. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279-309.

22.

Hornstein, H. A. (1982). Promotive tension: Theory and research. In V. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 229-248). New York: Academic.

23.

Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435-441.

24.

Kiefer, S., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Strivingfor social dominance over peers: The implications for academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(20), 417-428.

25.

Kurdek, L. A., Sinclair, R. J. (2000). Psychological, family, and peer predictors of academic outcomes in first-through fifth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 449-457.

26.

Ladd, G. W. (1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment? Child Development, 61(4), 1081-1100.

27.

Lansford, J. E., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2003). Friendship quality, peer group affiliation, and peer antisocial behavior as moderators of the link between negative parenting and adolescent externalizing behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(2), 161-184.

28.

Locke, K. (2003). Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 619-631.

29.

McClelland, D. C. (1985) How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812-825.

30.

Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A metaanalytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306-347.

31.

Ojanen, T., & Fineley-VanNostrand, D. (2014). Social goals, aggression, peer preference, and popularity: Longitudinal links during middle school. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2134-2143.

32.

Ojanen, T., Gronroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41 (5), 699-710.

33.

Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611-621.

34.

Renshaw, P., & Asher, S. (1983). Children’s goals and strategies for social interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29 (3), 353-374.

35.

Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology , 49(6), 1139-1150.

36.

Rose, A. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73(6), 1830-1843.

37.

Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (1999). Children’s goals and strategies in response to conflicts within a friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 69-79.

38.

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In R. M. Lerner, & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 321-409). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

39.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

40.

Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., Shin, H., & Thompson, G. (2012). Social achievement goals and adjustment during early adolescence. In A. Ryan & G. Ladd (Eds.) Peer Relationships and Adjustment at school (pp. 165-186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

41.

Ryan, A. M. & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics and teachers. In W. B. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.). Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups, 2nd Edition (pp. 637-656). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

42.

Shin, H. (2017a). Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, prosocial behavior, and social status: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46 (11), 2305- 2320.

43.

Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). How do young adolescents cope with social problems?: An examination of social goals, coping and social adjustment. Journal of Early Adolescence , 32 (6), 850-874.

44.

Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014b). Friendshipnet works and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1453-1464.

45.

Wentzel, K. (2001). The contribution of social goal setting to children’s school adjustment. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 221-246). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

46.

Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in Middle School: Influences on Motivation and School Adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195-203.

47.

Wilke, H., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1982). The obligation to help: Factors affecting response to help received. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(3), 315-319.

logo