바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

인터넷 자원의 서지레코드 기술에 관한 연구

A study on the description of bibliographic records on the Internet Resources

한국도서관·정보학회지 / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
1999, v.30 no.1, pp.219-241
이명규 (대불대학교 도서관)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

인터넷 자원에 효율적으로 접근하기 위해서는 그 정보를 체계적으로 조직화할 필요성이 있으며, 이러한 자원을 편목하는 기술은 발전하고 있다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 AACR2의 기술과 절차를 응용한 OCLC 매뉴얼과 인터넷 자원을 편목하는데 사용되는 더블린 코어를 비교분석하여, MARC 포맷으로의 매핑을 살펴보았다. 더블린 코어 형태로 제공되는 메타데이터 요소는 MARC포맷의 각 필드로 변환 할 수 있어야 한다. 또한, 여러 유형의 메타데이터 통합에 대한 방법으로 MARC에 대한 수정 및 새로운 필드의 마련이 필요하다. 특히 이러한 기술법을 정통한 인터넷자원 편목전문가들의 등장이 필요할 것이다.

keywords

Abstract

For an efficient access to Internet resources, these resources need to be organized systematically for accessibility. and their cataloging technique has been developing. Consequently, after I compared and analyzed OCLC manual applying AACR2 techniques and procedures, with Dublin core metadata used for cataloging Internet resources, I examined their mapping into MARC format. Dublin core metadata elements should be transformed to MARC format fields. In methodology of integration into different types of the metadata, an update of MARC format and its new field should be provided. Especially, Internet resources cataloging experts familiar with these technology will be really wanted nowadays.

keywords

참고문헌

1.

Michelson, A.. Why a CNI white paper Framing the problem.

2.

Computer Files.

3.

Xu, Amanda. (1996). Accessing information on the internet : Feasibility study of USMARC format and AACR2 . Proceedings of the OCLC internet cataloging colloquium-field reports.

4.

Dillon, Martin(et al.). .

5.

Library of Congress; Network Development and MARC Standards Office. .

6.

Oddy, Pat. .

7.

Olson, Nancy B.. .

8.

IFLA. Functional requirements for bibliographic records.

9.

Horny, Karen L.. (1986). Minimal-level cataloging : A Look at the issues-A symposium. The Journal of academic librarianship, 11(6), 332-342.

10.

Cromwell, Willy. (1994). The Core Record : A New Bibliographic Standard. LRTS, 38(4), 415-424.

11.

Cassel, Richard. (1995). Selection Criteria for Internet Resources. College & Research Libraries News, .

12.

Library of Congress. .

13.

Weibel, S.. (1995). Metadata : The foundations of resource description. D-lib Magazine, .

14.

문헌정보처리연구회(편). .

15.

Younger, Jennifer A.. (1997). Resources Description in the Digital Age. Library Trends, 45(3), 462-481.

16.

Olson, Nancy B.. .

17.

김태수. (1998). 메타데이터의 변환과 자원기술구조의 연구. 정보관리학회지, 15(3), 95-112.

18.

ALA. .

19.

Lynch, C.. Identifiable issues and the remaining research questions.

20.

Johnson, Peggy;B. MacEwan(ed.). .

21.

Sha, Vianne T.. (1995). Cataloguing internet resources : The library approach. Electronic Library, 13(5), 467-476.

22.

Gorman, M.. (1984). Report on the Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Survey of Minimal-level Cataloguing. Information Technology and Libraries, 3(4), 382-384.

23.

Ercegovac, Zorana. (1998). Minimal Level Cataloging : What Does It mean for Maps in the Contexts of Card Catalogs, Online Catalogs, and Digital Libraries. JASIS, 49(8), 706-719.

24.

O'Neill, Edward. (1997). Characteristics of Web Accessible Information . 63rd. Conference Programme and Proceedings.

25.

Shieh, Jackie. (1996). Does it really matter? The cataloging format, the sequential order of note fields, and the specific of field 856 . Proceedings of the OCLC internet cataloging colloquium-field reports.

26.

Weibel, S.. .

27.

Calan, Priscilla;Guenther, Rebecca. (1996). Metadata for Internet Resources : The Dublin Core Metadata Elements set and its mapping to USMARC. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 22(3/4), 43-58.

한국도서관·정보학회지