바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

문헌정보학에 있어서 일상생활 연구의 방법론적 함의 - 최근 연구동향을 중심으로 -

Methodological Implications of Everyday Life Research in Library and Information Science - With Special Reference to Current Research Trends -

한국도서관·정보학회지 / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
1999, v.30 no.2, pp.55-75
김정근 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
장덕현 (미 텍사스대(오스틴))
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

문헌정보학의 연구방법이 지나치게 실증주의 쪽으로 경도되어 있다는 것은 주지의 사실이다. 근래, 이것이 국내외적으로 비판의 대상이 되고 있기도 하다. 오늘날 연구자들은-문헌정보학은 인간학의 측면에서 연구될 필요가 있다고 주장한다. 현상학적인 관점에 따라 주관적 접근을 시도해야 한다는 것이다. 이들은 문헌정보학이 사서, 이용자, 관리자 둥의 형태로 다분히 '인간적' 요소와 관련이 있다는 정에 주목한다. 이 글에서는 관련 질적연구의 성과를 검토하고 특히 문헌정보학에서 일상생활 연구의 함의를 심도있게 따진다.

keywords

Abstract

Although the importance of research methodoogy in library and information science(LIS) has been widely recognized, LIS has been also criticized that current research methodology in the field maintains only the positivistic orientation. Researchers on the other hand, assert that US should be studied as a human study, a subjective approach based on a phenomenological perspective, since US has very much to do. with the 'human factor,' with subjectivity in the form of librarian, patron, and administrator. In this paper, a review of the published qualitative research in the field which try to generate theories from the subjects in their own everyday life situation, attempts to shed light on the implication of a new terrain of everyday life research to US. Theory of everyday life is generated by the subjects who are involved in the social relationship, using their own language. It is a theory which shows the logic of the real world in which the everyday man recognize, act and communicate. This includes the perceptions, feelings, and meanings members experience as well as the 'small world' they create in process. Everyday life research performed using qualitative research methods which have strength to investigate this micro-structure applied to the field of library and information science, may bring enrichment to the library and information science research.

keywords

참고문헌

1.

Mellon, Constance Ann.. .

2.

Davis, Charles H.. (1990). On Qualitative Research. Library and Information Science Research, 12, 327-9.

3.

Strauss, anselm;Juliet Corbin. .

4.

Odi, amus. (1982). Creative Research and Theory Building in Library and Information Science. College & Research Libraries, 43, 312-319.

5.

진양교. .

6.

박인웅;이용재. (1997). 공공도서관의 교육적 기능. 도서관, 52(3), 69-87.

7.

Harris, Roma;Janet Creelman. (1990). Coming Out : the Information Needs of Lesbians. Collection Building, 10, 37-41.

8.

Hall, Peter M.. (1990). The Contingent Constructed Nature of Social Life : Suggested Implications for Library and Information Science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 31, 139-147.

9.

Savolainen, Reijo. (1995). Everyday Life Information Seeking : Approaching Information Seeking in the Context of Way of Life. Library and Information Science Research, 17, 259-294.

10.

Benediktsson, Daniel. (1989). Hermeneutics:Dimensions Toward LIS Thinking. Library and Information Science Research, 11, 201-234.

11.

Fidel, Raya. (1993). Qualitative Methods in Information Retrieval Research. Library and Information Science Research, 15, 219-247.

12.

Heller, Agnes. .

13.

Pendleton, Victoria E. M.;Elfreda Chatman. (1998). Small World Lives : Implications for the Public Library. Library Trends, 46, 732-752.

14.

강대만. (1998). 가족과 함께 공공도서관을 찾아가자. 월간 서울, , 93.

15.

Chatman, Elfreda A.. (1985). Information, Mass Media Use and the Working Poor. Library and Information Science Research, 7, 97-113.

16.

Habermas, Jurgen. (1989). . Life World and System:A Critique of Functionalist Reason. The Teory of Communicative Action, 2.

17.

Hochschild, Arnold. .

18.

Bourdieu, Pierre;Jean-Claude Passeron. .

19.

Bradley, Jana. (1993). Methodological Issues and Practices in Qualitative Research. The Library Quarterly, 63, 431-449.

20.

Dervin, Brenda;Jack D. Gazier(ed.);Ronald R. Powell(ed.). From Mind's Eye of the User:The Sense-making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology.

21.

김정근;김종성. (1997). 현단계 학교도서관 문제에 관한 연구전략. 한국문헌정보학회지, 31(3), 24-50.

22.

Behar, Ruth. .

23.

Lefebvre, Henri. .

24.

Chatman, Elfreda A.. (1991). Life in a Small World : Applicability of Gratification Theory to Information-Seeking Behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 438-449.

25.

Chatman, Elfreda A.. (1999). The Theory of Life in the Round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 207-217.

26.

Harris, Roma;Patricia Dewdney. .

27.

Bourdieu, Pierre. .

28.

Dervin, Brenda;Nilan, Michael. (1986). Information Needs and Uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology(ARIST), 21, 3-33.

29.

최재현. (1985). 일상생활의 이론과 노동자의 의식세계-서독거주 한국인노동자에 대한 질적조사연구의 예. 한국사회학, 19, 111-129.

30.

Foley, Douglas. .

31.

Chatman, Elfreda A.. .

32.

김정근;장덕현. (1994). 우리나라 공공도서관 발전의 현단계에 관한 연구:부산, 경남지역 공공도서관 사서의 일상적 의식세계에 대한 질적분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 27, 3-73.

33.

Natoli, Joseph P.. (1982). Librarianship as a Human Science : Theory, Method and Application. Library Research, 4, 163-174.

34.

김영기. .

35.

최정태. (1997). 아! 100만권의 蒸柚. 부산대학교 교수회보, 78, 16-7.

36.

Negroponte, Nicholas. .

37.

Harris, Michael H.. (1986). The Dialectic of Defeat : Antinomies in Research in Library and Information Science. Library Trends, 34, 515-531.

38.

김정근. .

한국도서관·정보학회지