- P-ISSN2466-2542
- KCI
포털 도서검색서비스 대응방안에 대한 연구 - 구글도서검색을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Countermeasures to Book Search Services of Web Portals: Focusing on Google Book Search
초록
방대한 이용자 기반을 지닌 인터넷 검색 포털인 구글은 도서검색(Book Search) 서비스를 제공하고 있다. 구글은 도서검색서비스의 제공에 필요한 정보자원의 확보를 위해 출판계 및 도서관계와 협력을 추진하고 있다. 출판계와는 출판사가 저작권을 보유한 도서의 이용을 목적으로 협력하고 있으며, 도서관계와는 도서관이 소장한 장서의 디지털화 및 디지털로 변환한 자료의 활용을 위해 협력하고 있다. 구글도서검색 서비스는 방대한 이용자 규모에 기반을 두는 구글의 영향력에 따른 독점의 위험성과 독점에 따라 야기될 수 있는 잠재적인 문제점들로 인해 많은 논란을 빚고 있다. 본고에서는 이러한 구글도서검색과 관련하여 도서관계가 취해야 할 대응방안을 정리하여 제시하였다.
- keywords
- Google Book Search, Google, Book Search, Portal Book Search, Portal, Digitization of Library Collection, Digitized Books, Countermeasures, 구글도서검색, 구글, 도서검색, 포털 도서검색, 포털, 장서 디지털화, 디지털화된 도서, 대응방안, Google Book Search, Google, Book Search, Portal Book Search, Portal, Digitization of Library Collection, Digitized Books, Countermeasures
Abstract
Google, an internet search service with extensive user base, has provided Book Search service. Google has pursued collaboration with publishers and libraries to obtain content for Book Search service; publisher community for the purpose of sourcing the books with copyrights, and the libraries for the purpose of digitizing their collections and also utilizing already digitized resources. Google Book Search Service has evoked significant controversy because of the potential monopoly problems and its risk, accompanied by Google's huge influence and broad user spectrum. This study, thus, suggests the countermeasures that library community should prepare in order to cope with the Google Book Search.
- keywords
- Google Book Search, Google, Book Search, Portal Book Search, Portal, Digitization of Library Collection, Digitized Books, Countermeasures, 구글도서검색, 구글, 도서검색, 포털 도서검색, 포털, 장서 디지털화, 디지털화된 도서, 대응방안, Google Book Search, Google, Book Search, Portal Book Search, Portal, Digitization of Library Collection, Digitized Books, Countermeasures
참고문헌
1) Jennifer C. Hendrix, “Checking Out the Future. Perspectives from the Library Community on. Information Technology and 21st-Century Libraries,” Policy Brief, No.2(Feb. 2010), <www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oitp/.../ala_checking_out_the.pdf> [cited 2010. 9. 10].
2) Jill E. Grogg and Beth Ashmore, “Google Book Search Libraries and Their Digital Copies,” Searcher, Vol.15, No.4(2007), pp.18-27.
3) Robert J. Lackie, “From Google Print to Google Book Search: The Controversial Initiative and Its Impact on Other Remarkable Digitization Projects,” The Reference Librarian, Vol.49, No.1(2008), pp.35-53.
4) Google, History of Google Books, <http://books.google.com/intl/en/googlebooks/history.html> [cited 2010. 10. 14].
6) 구글, 도서검색 저작권 본건화해, <http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/> [인용 2010. 10. 5].
7) 세계일보, 구글전자도서관 곳곳서 제동, 2010년 4월 7일.
9) 구글, 도서검색정보, <http://books.google.com/googlebooks/about.html> [인용 2010. 10. 5].
10) 도서관연구소, “구글과 미국 출판계의 화해합의안은 도서관에 어떤 영향을 미치는가?,” 도서관연구소 웹진, 42호(2009. 9. 30), pp.6-7, <http://webzine.nl.go.kr/publish/krili/200909_01/pdf/tendency01_0930.pdf> [인용 2010. 9. 10].
12) Google, Library Partners, <http://books.google.com/googlebooks/partners.html> [cited 2010. 12. 9].
OCLC, OCLC and Google to exchange data, link digitized books to WorldCat, <http://www.oclc.org/news/releases/200811.htm> [cited 2010. 10. 15].
15) Charles W. Bailey, Jr., Google Books Bibliography Version 6, 2010, <http://www.digital-scholarship.com/gbsb/gbsb.htm> [cited 2011. 1. 11].
16) 남영준, 양지안, “대학도서관 이용자의 메타서치시스템 이용행태 연구,” 정보관리학회지, 제27권, 제3호(2010. 9), pp.307-323.
19) Marcus A. Banks, “The Excitement of Google Scholar, the Worry of Google Print,” Biomedical Digital Libraries, Vol.2(2005), <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1079792> [cited 2010. 9. 3].
20) Kay Cahill, “An Opportunity, Not a Crisis: How Google Is Changing the Individual and the Information Profession,” Journal of Library Administration, Vol.47, No.1(2008), pp.67-75.
21) Grogg and Ashmore, op. cit. pp.129-132.
23) JISC, The Digital Information Seeker: Report of findings from selected OCLC, RIN and JISC user behaviour projects, 2010, <http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2010/digitalinformationseekers.aspx> [cited 2010. 7. 10].
26) ALA, Library Association Comments on the Proposed Settlement, 2009, <http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/googlebrieffinal.pdf> [cited 2010. 9. 16].
27) IFLA, IFLA Written Statement to the European Commission hearing on the Google Book Settlement, 2009, <http://www.ifla.org/files/clm/statements/ifla-google-written-statement.pdf> [cited 2010. 9. 18].
28) 네이버, 전문정보 서비스 개편 3탄!, <http://blog.naver.com/naver_search/20110488391> [인용 2010. 11. 4].
29) 네이버, Naver 전문정보, <http://academic.naver.com/> [인용 2010. 11. 3].
32) JISC, op. cit., pp.45-51.
33) Cathy De Rosa, Perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC Membership(Dublin, Ohio : OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2005), p.35(item no. 1-17).
34) 국립중앙도서관 자료디지털화 방안 연구 TF, 국립중앙도서관 자료디지털화 방안 연구(서울 : 국립중앙도서관, 2009).
36) 상게서, p.6.
37) 한국도서관협회, 2009 한국도서관연감(서울 : 한국도서관협회, 2009), p.443.
39) Research Information Network, E-journals: Their use, value and impact. London: Research Information Network, 2009, <http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/ejournals-their-use-value-and-impact> [cited 2010. 9. 23].
41) 구글, Google이 도서관 파트너와 맺은 계약서 사본을 볼 수 있나요?, <http://books.google.co.kr/support/bin/answer.py?hl=kr&answer=43752> [인용 2010. 11. 3].
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수