바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.43 No.4
Citation Share

KDC 5판 기초법학 부문 개선방안 연구

A Study on the Developing Modifications of KDC 5th ed. in Jurisprudence Field

한국도서관·정보학회지 / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2012, v.43 no.4, pp.5-22
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.5
김자후 (광주대학교)
김자후. (2012). KDC 5판 기초법학 부문 개선방안 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 43(4), 5-22, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.5
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

이 연구는, KDC 5판 360.1-.9(기초법학 및 법률학일반)의 전개체계를 개선하기 위한 것으로서, 먼저 법률학 전문 학술서적에 나타난 기초법학(이론법학)의 세부 학문체계를 기본바탕으로 하고, KDC 5판, DDC 23판 및 NDC 9판의 기초법학 부문을 비교·분석하여 추가로 반영하였으며, 마지막으로 국내 법학전문대학원 교과과정을 전수 조사하여 신규 주제항목(교과목 단위)을 추가하여 국내실정에 가장 적합한 개선방안을 마련하여 제시함으로써 KDC 6판에 일조하고자 한 것이다.

keywords
문헌분류법, 기초법학, 한국십진분류법, 듀이십진분류법, 일본십진분류법, Literature Classification Scheme, Jurisprudence, KDC, DDC, NDC

Abstract

The purpose of this study aims to provide possible suggestions for the improvement of KDC 5th ed. in Jurisprudence Field. The research methods are as follows. First, to analyze academic fields in Jurisprudence, the contents of Jurisprudence introductory books are investigated. Second, to find out the problem of KDC Jurisprudence field, comparative analysis is done on the three classification schemes - KDC, DDC and NDC. Third, curriculum of domestic law schools are reflected. If above suggestions are adopted, effective literature classification scheme which is suited to domestic circumstances will be certainly prepared.

keywords
문헌분류법, 기초법학, 한국십진분류법, 듀이십진분류법, 일본십진분류법, Literature Classification Scheme, Jurisprudence, KDC, DDC, NDC

참고문헌

1.

김은정. 연구데이터 수집에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 박사학위논문, 중앙대학교 대학원 기록관리학과 기록물관리학 전공, 2012.

2.

신영란. 인문사회 연구데이터 아카이브의 발전방향에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 정책과학대학원 기록관리 전공, 2012.

3.

American Council on Learned Societies (ACLS). Our Cultural Commonwealth: the Final Report of the American Council of Learned Societies commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2006. <www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/OurCulturalCommonwealth.pdf> [cited 2012. 8.18].

4.

Beagrie, Neil, Robert Beagrie, and Ian Rowlands. “Research Data Preservation and Access: The Views of Researchers,” Ariadne, Vol.60(2009). <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/beagrie-et-al/> [cited 2012.8.18]

5.

Borgman, Christine L., Jillian C. Wallis, and Noel Enyedy. “Building Digital Libraries for Scientific Data: An Exploratory Study of Data Practices in Habitat Ecology.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No.4172(2006), pp.170-183.

6.

Borgman, Christine L.. “Data, Disciplines, and Scholarly Publishing.” Learned Publishing, Vol.21(2008), pp.29-38.

7.

Borgman, Christine L. “The Digital Future is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, Vol.3, No.4(2009). <http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html>[cited 2012.8.18]

8.

Carlson, Samuelle and Ben Anderson. “What are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.12, No.2(2007). <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/carlson.html> [cited 2012.8.18].

9.

Faniel, Ixchel M. and Trond E. Jacobsen. “Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol.19(2010), pp.355-375.

10.

Griffith, Aaron. “The Publication of Research Data: Researcher Attitudes and Behaviour,” International Journal of Data Curation, Vol.1, No.4(2009), pp.46-56.

11.

Hedstrom, Margaret and Jinfang Niu. “Incentives for Data Producers to Create "Archive-Ready" Data: Implications for Archives and Records Management,” Proceedings of 2008 Society of American Archivist Research Forum. 2008. <http://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/M-HedstromJ-Niu-SAA-ResearchPaper-2008.pdf> [cited 2012.8.18.]

12.

Higgins, Sarah. “The DCC curation lifecycle model,” International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol.3, No.1(June 2008), pp.134-140.

13.

Hey, Tony and Anne E. Trefethen. “Cyberinfrastructure and e-Science.” Science, Vol.308(May2005), pp.134-140.

14.

Humphrey, Charles. e-Science and the life cycle of research, 2006.<http://datalib.library.ualberta.ca/~humphrey/lifecycle-science060308.doc> [cited 2012.8.18].

15.

Karasti, Helena, Karen S. Baker, and Eija Halkola. “Enriching the Notion of Data Curation In E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol.15(2006), pp.321-358.

16.

Lyon, Liz. “eBank UK: Building the Links between Research Data, Scholarly Communication and Learning,” Ariadne, Vol.36, 2003. <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue36/lyon/> [cited 2012.8.18]

17.

National Science Foundation (NSF), Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure.(Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2003).

18.

Perry, Carol Marie. “Archiving of Publicly Funded Research Data: A Survey of Canadian Researchers,” Government Information Quarterly, Vol.25(2008), pp.133-148.

19.

Swan, Alma and Sheridan Brown. To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. A report commissioned by the Research Information Network, 2008. <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/266742/> [cited 2012.8.18].

20.

Tenopir, Carol, Suzie Allard, Kimberly Douglass, Arsev Umur Aydinoglu, Lei Wu, Eleanor Read, Maribeth Manoff, and Mike Frame. “Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions,” PLoS ONE, Vol.6, No.6(June 2011). <http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101> [cited 2012.8.18].

21.

Whyte, Angus, Dominic Job, Stephen Giles, and Stephen Lawrie. Meeting Curation Challenges in a Neuroimaging Group. International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol.3, No.1(2008), pp.171-181.

22.

Zimmerman, Ann S. “New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data,” Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol.33, No.5(2008), pp.631-652.

23.

Dewey, Melvil. Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index. 23rd ed. Ohio : OCLCOnline Computer Library Center, 2011.

24.

Doyle, Sheila M. “Religious Law.” In : Manual of Law Librarianship, edited by Elizabeth M. Moys. 1976. pp.362-378.

25.

Moys, Elizabeth M. Moys Classification Scheme for Law Books. 2nd ed. London : Butterworths, 1982.

26.

Steiner. W.A. “Some Problems of Classification in International and Comparative Law.” International Journal of Legal Information, Vol.10, No.6(December 1982). pp.325-342.

한국도서관·정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책