바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.39 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2008, v.39 no.4, pp.71-96
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71


& (2008). A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 71-96, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Recently, some universities and university libraries have implemented performance management system as a part of managerial innovation, and they have either implemented or are considering implementing BSC. Thus there are needs to develop performance indicator, which is a tool measuring performance of university libraries, based on BSC, and to assess the developed performance indicator's relative weights to analyze which indicators are essential to fulfill and improve the university library's mission. The performance indicators are also affected by the characteristics and perspectives of the people who develop them during the development process. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the differences among the professional groups in relative weighting of the performance indicator. The purposes of this study are to derive a university library performance indicator model based on BSC, to analyze the importance of each evaluation factor of the derived performance indicator model, and to analyze the differences among the professional groups in relative weighting of the performance indicator model.

keywords
University Libraries, Performance Indicator, Balanced Scorecard, Relative Weights, Model Design, Performance Management System, Evaluation Factor, 대학도서관, 성과지표, 균형성과표, 상대적 가중치, 모형설계, 성과관리시스템, 평가요소, University Libraries, Performance Indicator, Balanced Scorecard, Relative Weights, Model Design, Performance Management System, Evaluation Factor

Reference

1.

조윤희, (2006) 대학도서관의 BSC 적용에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

2.

최동득, (2006) 알기귀운 BSC, KOMIT 출판사

3.

배병한 ; 박기석 ; 조규성, (2006) AHP를 활용한 R&D 부문의 BSC 관점별 가중치 도출, 한국경영교육학회지

4.

조윤희, (2006) 대학도서관의 BSC 적용에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

5.

최재황 ; 곽승진 ; 김정택, (2007) 디지털도서관 서비스의 성과지표 측정 및 적용, 한국문헌정보학회지

6.

조현연, 대학도서관에서의 BSC 적용에 관한 연구, 가톨릭대학교 산업경영연구

7.

Klaus Ceynowa, (2000) Managing Academic Information Provision with the Balanced Scorecard: A Project of the German Research Association, Performance Measurement and Metrics

8.

Roswitha Poll, (2003) Managing Service Quality with the Balanced Scorecard, Advanced in Library Administration and Organization

9.

James Self, (2003) From Values to Metrics: Implementation of the Balanced Scorecard at a University Library, Performance Measurement and Metrics

10.

James Self, (2004) Metrics and Management: Applying the Results of the Balanced Scorecard, Performance Measurement and Metrics

11.

버지니아대학 홈페이지, ,

12.

Roswitha Poll, (2003) Managing Service Quality with the Balanced Scorecard, Advanced in Library Administration and Organization

13.

Winnie Chim, (2007) The Quest for Excellence: One Library's Experience, Library Management

14.

인하대학교 정석학술정보관 홈페이지, ,

15.

University of Maryland Libraries Strategic Plan, ,

16.

Macquarie University Library 2005-06 strategic plan, ,

17.

버지니아대학 도서관 홈페이지, ,

18.

In Pursuit of Our Strategic Vision 2005-2010, ,

19.

Library Strategic Planning, ,

20.

인디애나 주립대학 도서관 홈페이지, ,

21.

Oxford University Library Services Vision for 2010,

22.

Cambridge University Library Strategic Plan, ,

23.

김정택, (2008) 대학도서관 성과지표 모형 개발을 위한 상대적 가중치 연구,

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy