바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.41 No.1
Citation Share

A Case Study on the Next Generation Library Catalogs

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2010, v.41 no.1, pp.5-28
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.1.201003.5

(2010). A Case Study on the Next Generation Library Catalogs. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1), 5-28, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.1.201003.5
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the major features of Next Generation Library Catalogs. ‘Next Generation Melvyl Pilot’ of University of California Library System and ‘SearchWorks’ of Stanford University Library are examined. While the former is developed, based on OCLC WorldCat Local, the latter is based on the Blacklight, an Open Source Catalog Software. Both commonly provide the features, including enriched contents, facet navigation, keyword searching, relevancy ranking of search results, and user contribution, etc., but some functions vary in scopes and contents. Also, it seems that both are in process of development rather than complete implementations.

keywords
차세대 도서관 목록, 검색 인터페이스, 차세대 멜빌 파일로트, 서치웍스, Next Generation Library Catalog, Search Interface, Next Generation Melvyl Pilot, SearchWorks

Reference

1.

1) Martha M. Yee and Sara Shatford Layne, Improving Online Public Access Catalogs(Chicago : American Library Association, 1998), p.1.

2.

2) John D. Byrum, “Recommendations for Urgently Needed Improvement of OPAC and the Role of the National Bibliographic Agency in Achieving It,” Paper presented for the 71st IFLA General Conference and Council(Oslo, Norway, August 14-18, 2005), <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/papers/124e-Byrum.pdf> [cited 2009. 12. 10].

3.

3) Tito Sierra, Joseph Ryan, and Markus Wust, “Beyond OPAC 2.0: Library Catalog as Versatile Discovery Platform,” Code{4}Lib Journal, Issue 1(2007. 12. 17.), <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/24> [cited 2009. 12. 31].

4.

4) OCLC, Online Catalogs : What Users and Librarians Want : An OCLC Report, 2009, <http://www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf> [cited 2009. 12. 10].

5.

5) Marshall Breeding, “Integrated Library Software : A Guide to Multiuser, Multifunction Systems,” Library Technology Reports, Vol.40, No.1(2004), pp.56-59.

6.

6) 심경, “차세대 도서관 목록의 사례 : AquaBrowser,” 도서관문화, 제49권, 제10호(2008. 8), pp.48-56.

7.

7) 심경, “차세대 도서관 목록의 사례 (2) : WorldCat Local,” 도서관문화, 제49권, 제11호(2008. 11), pp.54-61.

8.

9) Ross Singer, “Communicat : The Next Generation Catalog That Almost Was...,” Code{4}Lib Journal, Issue 1(2007), <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/> [cited 2009. 12. 31].

9.

10) 심경, “차세대 도서관 목록,” 도서관문화, 제49권, 제9호(2008. 9)

10.

11) Varnum Ken, ASIS&T 2007 : Next-Generation Catalog : Prototypes and Prospects, 2007, <http://www.rss4lib.com/2007/10/asist_2007_nextgeneration_cata.html> [cited 2009. 12. 26].

11.

12) Marshall Breeding, Library Technology Guides : Key resources in the field of Library Automation, 2009, <http://www.librarytechnology.org/> [cited 2009. 12. 26].

12.

13) Henrik Lindstrom and Martin Malmsten, “User-Centred Design and Agile Development : Rebuilding the Swedish National Union Catalog,” Code{4}Lib Journal, Issue 1(2007), <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/> [cited 2009. 12. 31].

13.

14) California Digital Library, Melvyl Help : Learn More, <http://melvyl.cdlib.org/> [cited 2009. 12. 7].

14.

16) California Digital Library, A Brief History of the Melvyl® System’s Development, <http://www.cdlib.org/inside/projects/melvyl/dlahistory.html> [cited 2009. 12. 7].

15.

17) Stanford University Library Home page, <http://socrates.stanford.edu> [cited 2009. 12. 7].

16.

18) Marshall Breeding, “Lib-web-cats. A Directory of Libraries throughout the World Cecil H. Green Libraries. Stanford University,” <http://www.librarytechnology.org/diglib-fulldisplay.pl> [cited 2009. 12. 11].

17.

19) Stanford University Library, About SearchWorks, <http://lib.stanford.edu/searchworks/what-searchworks> [cited 2009. 12. 7].

18.

20) Blacklight Home page, <http://projectblacklight.org/> [cited 2009. 12. 11].

19.

21) University of California Library System, <http://melvyl.worldcat.org/> [cited 2009. 12. 11].

20.

22) University of California Library System, <http://melvyl.cdlib.org/> [cited 2009. 12. 11].

21.

23) University of California Library System, <http://melvyl.worldcat.org/advancedsearch> [cited 2009. 12. 11].

22.

24) Stanford University Library Home page, <http://library.stanford.edu> [cited 2009. 12. 11].

23.

25) Marshall Breeding, “Thinking About Your Next OPAC,” Computers in Libraries, Vol.27, No.4(2007)

24.

27) Stanford University, SULAIR Home page, About SearchWorks, <https://lib.stanford.edu/searchworks/advanced-search> [cited 2009. 12. 12].

25.

29) OCLC Home page, WorldCat Facts and Statistics, <http://www.oclc.org/us/en/worldcat/statistics/default.htm> [cited 2010. 1. 1].

26.

31) VirgoBeta Home page, <http://virgobeta.lib.virginia.edu/> [cited 2010. 1. 1].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy