바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.42 No.1
Citation Share

Intellectual Freedom Issues in Library Collection Development

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2011, v.42 no.1, pp.165-182
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.1.201103.165

(2011). Intellectual Freedom Issues in Library Collection Development. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(1), 165-182, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.1.201103.165
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This paper attempts to portray the issues of intellectual freedom that confront librarians in developing collections in libraries. It is observed that the issue has hardly been drawn attention in Korea while, from various cases, concerns about intellectual freedom have been increased in many countries. Situated in this observation, this paper surveys various aspects of endeavors to protect intellectual freedom in information service settings. It is also stressed how such issues as free access to information, freedom to know, information barriers in public sectors, and freedom of expression are addressed in library world. Emphasis was also put on the meaning of intellectual freedom as viewed through some policy documents and guidelines in other countries and its implications.

keywords
지적자유, 장서개발, 검열, Intellectual Freedom, Collection Development, Censorship, Intellectual Freedom, Collection Development, Censorship

Reference

1.

1) 장덕현, “지적자유와 도서관 : IFLA/FAIFE 활동을 중심으로,” 도서관문화, 제42권, 제6호(2001. 12), pp.42-46.

2.

2) G. Edward Evans and Margaret Z. Saponaro, Developing Library and Information Center Collections(Westport, CT. : Libraries Unlimited, 2005), p.410.

3.

3) ALA, “Intellectual Freedom/Censorship," <http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/intfreedom/index.cfm> [cited 2011. 1. 5].

4.

4) 정현태, “우리나라 공공도서관의 지적자유에 대한 사례 연구,” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제34권, 제1호(2000), p.244.

5.

5) 정현태, 공공도서관의 지적자유(서울 : 한국도서관협회, 2002), p.11.

6.

6) Theo J. Bothma, 2010 IFLA World Report, <http://www.ifla-world-report.org/files/uploaded/ifla_wr/IFLA-WR-2010-Analysis-and-Conclusions.pdf> [cited 2011. 1. 7].

7.

8) The Freedom to Read Statement, <http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/statementspols/ftrstatement/freedomreadstatement.cfm> [cited 2011. 1. 19].

8.

9) IFLA. “Intellectual Freedom Statements", <http://www.ifla.org/en/publications/intellectual-freedom-statements-by-others> [cited 2011. 2. 20].

9.

10) ALIA Intellectual Freedom Statements, <http://archive.ifla.org/faife/ifstat/aliastat.htm> [cited 2011. 2. 20].

10.

11) 日本図書館協会, 図書館の自由に関する宣言, <http://www.jla.or.jp/ziyuu.htm> [cited 2011. 2. 20].

11.

12) EU International Right to Know Day, <http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/activities/calendareve nt.faces/en/400/html.bookmark> [cited 2011. 2. 11].

12.

13) Lester Asheim, “Not Censorship but Selection," Wilson Library Bulletin, Vol.28(1953), pp.63-67.

13.

14) Francine Fialkoff, “Selection not Censorship," Library Journal(May 15, 2004), p.69.

14.

15) 이명희, “도서관에서의 지적자유 수호를 위한 노력과 금서에 관한 연구,” 한국비블리아학회지, 제15권, 제1호(2004), p.195.

15.

16) 니컬러스 J. 캐롤리드스 등, 100권의 금서 : 금지된 책의 문화사, 손희승 역(서울 : 예담, 2006), pp.580-58.

16.

이명희, “도서관에서의 지적자유에 대한 이론적 고찰과 저해하는 사례 연구,” 한국비블리아학회지, 제12권, 제2호(2001), p.149.

17.

17) Judith Krug, “ALA and Intellectual Freedom : A Historical Overview," Intellectual Freedom Manual, 7th ed, (Chicago : ALA, 2006), p.18.

18.

18) 호주 기독교 대학, 해리포터 금지. YTN 2003. 7. 2.

19.

19) 한겨레신문, ‘다빈치코드 반대와 표현의 자유’(2006. 4. 11), <http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/opinion/editorial/114767.html> [cited 2011. 2. 11].

20.

20) 캐롤리드스 등, 전게서, pp.592-596.

21.

21) “Mom wants to ban, burn ‘Bunny Suicides',” <http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/10/ore_mom_wont_return_bunny_suic.html#post> [cited 2011. 2. 10].

22.

22) “And Tango Makes Three,” <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_Tango_Makes_Three> [cited 2011. 2. 11].

23.

23) Banned Books Week : Celebrating the Freedom to Read, <http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/bannedbooksweek/index.cfm> [cited 2011. 2. 11].

24.

24) Top ten most frequently challenged books of 2009, <http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/frequentlychallenged/21stcenturychallenged/2009/index.cfm> [cited 2011. 1. 21].

25.

25) Number of Challenges by Year, Reason, Initiator & Institution(1990-2009), <http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/frequentlychallenged/challengesbytype/index.cfm> [cited 2011. 1. 22].

26.

26) CLA Advisory Committee on Intellectual Freedom. Annual survey of challenges to library resources and policies in Canada for 2009, <http://www.cla.ca/Content/NavigationMenu/CLAatWork/Committees/Challenges_to_Canadi.htm> [cited 2011. 1. 15].

27.

27) CPPA, COPA, CIPA : Which Is Which? <http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/ifissues/issuesrelatedlinks/cppacopacipa.cfm> [cited 2011. 1. 22].

28.

28) Why the Library of Congress Is Blocking Wikileaks, <http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/12/ why-the-library-of-congress-is-blocking-wikileaks/>.

29.

Blocking Access to Wikileaks May Harm CRS, Analysts Say, <http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/12/crs_block.html> [cited 2011. 1. 6].

30.

29) 김영기, 부산지역 공공도서관 장서형성의 사회사(박사학위논문, 부산대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과, 1999), p.118.

31.

이명희, 전게논문, pp.202-204.

32.

31) 오마이뉴스(2004. 5. 24).

33.

32) 한국일보(2010. 10. 29).

34.

33) 정현태, 전게서, pp.62-63.

35.

34) ALA. Intellectual Freedom Manual. 7th ed. (Chicago, ALA, 2006).

36.

35) 국립중앙도서관 장서개발정책, <http://www.nl.go.kr/intro/task/jangseo(20110101).pdf> [cited 2011. 2. 22].

37.

윤희윤, 장덕현. “국가도서관장서개발정책 수립에 관한 연구,” 한국비블리아학회지, 제21권, 제4호(2010), pp.107-122.

38.

36) The Freedom to Read Statement, <http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/statementspols/ftrstatement/freedomreadstatement.cfm> [cited 2011. 1. 19].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy