바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Developmental Tools of Performance Task for Information Literacy Instruction

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2011, v.42 no.4, pp.31-50
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In education, evaluation is an important element because instructor can judge the growth and development of students, it has been to bring about quality improvement in education. Performance assessment has emerged to overcome traditional evaluation such as paper test, multiple choice test. Performance assessment is an approach to measuring a student's status based on the way the student completes a specified task. Information literacy instruction is aimed at cultivating information literacy. Performance assessment suitable for measurement to status of Information literacy. In order to performance assessment, task should have the first. However, instructor is difficult to develop a good performance task to meet the assessment needs. Therefore, this research aims at suggesting the developmental tool of performance task applicable to Information literacy instruction. The proposed tool is a template type, consists of 4 steps, educational goals and learning objectives, knowledge and capabilities, task types, measurement and scoring criteria.

keywords
정보활용교육, 교육평가, 수행평가, 수행과제, 수행과제 개발 도구, Information Literacy Instruction, Education Evaluation, Performance Assessment, Performance Task, Performance Task Developmental Tools, Information Literacy Instruction, Education Evaluation, Performance Assessment, Performance Task, Performance Task Developmental Tools

Reference

1.

1) 황혜정, 황윤주, “교과서 분석에 기초한 수학과 수행과제의 이해와 활용,” 한국수학교육학회지, 제44권, 제1호(2005), p.16.

2.

2) L. G. Burchinal, “The Communications Revolution : America's Third Century Challenge,” In The Future of Organizing Knowledge(College Station, TX : Texas A & M University, 1976), p.11.

3.

3) J. Shapiro, J. Jeremy, and Shelley K. Hughes, “Information Literacy as a Liberal Art,” Educom Review, Vol.31, No.2(Mar/Apr 1996), pp.31-35.

4.

4) 이병기, 정보활용교육론(파주 : 조은글터, 2006), p.74.

5.

5) American Library Association and Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Information Power : Building Partnerships for Learning(Chicago and London : AASL, AECT, 1998), pp.8-13.

6.

6) Association of College and Research Libraries, The Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education(Chicago : ALA, 2000), pp.1-17.

7.

7) 이병기, op. cit., p.155.

8.

8) A. Irving, Study and Information Skills Across the Curriculum(London : Heinemann Educational Books, 1985), pp.26-32.

9.

9) M. B. Eisenberg and R. E. Berkowitz, Information Problem-solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library and Information Skills Instruction(Norwood, NJ : Ablex, 1990), pp.11-17.

10.

10) 서울대학교출판부, 교육학대백과사전(서울 : 하우동설, 1998), p.155.

11.

11) ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy, Final Report(Chicago : ALA, 1989), p.11.

12.

12) Nancy P. Thomas, Information Literacy and Information Skills Instruction(Englewood, Colorado : Libraries, 1999), p.174.

13.

13) Anita L. Vance and R. Nickel, Assessing Student Learning in the School Library Media Center(Chicago : AASL, 2007), pp.18-21.

14.

14) 김경희, 성태제, 수행평가의 이해와 실제(서울 : 이화여자대학교 사범대학, 2002), p.6.

15.

15) 권대훈, 교육평가(서울 : 학지사, 2005), pp.402-403.

16.

16) 최호성, “학습평가의 패러다임 전환 : 수행평가의 의미와 평가과제의 유형,” 대구대학교 초등교육연구논총, 제8집(1996), pp.22-29.

17.

N. Khattri and D. Sweet, “Assessment Reform : Promises and Challenges," In M. B. Kane and R. Mitchell, Implementing Performance Assessment(Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996), pp.12-27.

18.

18) J. L. Herman, P. R. Aschbacher, and L.Winters, A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment(Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1992), pp.v-vi, <http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED352389.pdf> [cited 2011. 10. 30].

19.

Grant P. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design : Handbook(Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1999). ; 강현석 등역, 거꾸로 생각하는 교육과정개발: 핸드북(서울: 학지사, 2008), p.142.

20.

20) 권대훈, op. cit., pp.409-411.

21.

21) J. L. Herman, P. R. Aschbacher, and L.Winters, op. cit., pp.33-34.

22.

22) Grant P. Wiggins and J. McTighe, 거꾸로 생각하는 교육과정 개발: 핸드북, 강현석 등역(서울: 학지사, 2008), p.178.

23.

이병기, “백워드 설계 모형을 적용한 도서관과 정보생활 교과의 교수설계에 관한 연구,” 한국비블리아학회지, 제22권, 제3호(2011), p.12.

24.

23) Grant P. Wiggins & J. McTighe, Understanding by Design(Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1998), pp.45-60.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society