바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Factors of the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Adoption in Academic Libraries

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2013, v.44 no.3, pp.471-488
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.3.201309.471


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study aims to explore the status of next generation OPAC functionalities adopted by Korean academic libraries, and factors affecting their functionalities adoption. So 181 OPACs among 191 Korean academic libraries’ OPACs are surveyed using a checklist consisting of 27 next generation OPAC functionalities. The relationships between the next generation OPAC functionalities adopted by academic libraries’ OPAC and 6 factors of library, i.e., establishment, region of universities, volumes in library collection, total library expenditures, total target users, and automation solutions are analyzed by using SPSS Statistics 21. It is found that all factors except establishment of universities significantly affected the adoption of the next generation OPAC functionalities, and further detailed analysis for each factors is provided.

keywords
Next generation OPAC, OPAC 2.0, Academic library OPAC, Innovation diffusion, Technology adoption, 차세대 OPAC, OPAC 2.0, 대학도서관 OPAC, 혁신확산, 기술수용

Reference

1.

도태현, 정영미. “대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 채택과 확산 현황.” 한국도서관·정보학회지, 제44권, 제2호(2013. 6), pp.197-215.

2.

박미성. “Web 2.0 기술 적용 사이트 분석을 통한 도서관 정보시스템의 활용 방안에 관한 연구.” 한국도서관․정보학회지, 제39권, 제1호(2008.3), pp.139-168.

3.

박종구. “트위터 채택에 관한 통합모델 : 혁신확산이론, 기술수용모델, 혁신저항모델 에 대한 통합적 접근.” Internet and Information Security, 제3권, 제1호(2012.1), pp.35-63.

4.

이혜영. “대학도서관의 OPAC 2.0 서비스에 대한 이용자 인식조사.” 한국도서관․정보학 회 지 , 제43권, 제2호(2012.6), pp.179-201.

5.

Breeding, Marshall. “Next-Generation Library Catalogs." Library Technology Reports, Vol.43, No.4(July/Aug. 2007), pp.5-14.

6.

Chalon, Patrice X., Emmanuel Di Pretoro, and Laurence Kohn. “OPAC 2.0 : Opportunities, Development and Analysis." In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries(June 2008), pp.1-11.

7.

Davis, Fred D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3(Sep. 1989), pp.319-340.

8.

Han, Zhiping and Yan Quan Liu. “Web 2.0 Application in Top Chinese University Libraries." Library Hi Tech, Vol.28, No.1(2010), pp.41-62.

9.

Kim, Yong-Mi and June Abbas. “Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users : A Knowledge Management Perspective." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.36, No.3(May 2010), pp.211-218.

10.

Mahmood, Khalid and John V. Richardson Jr. “Adoption of Web 2.0 in US Academic Libraries : A Survey of ARL Library Websites." Program : Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol.45, No.4(2011), pp.365-375.

11.

Sadeh, Tamar. “User-Centric Solutions for Scholarly Research in the Library." Liber Quarterly, Vol.17, No.3/4(2007), <http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/7897/8124> [cited 2013. 4. 22].

12.

Yang, Sharon Q. and Melissa A. Hofmann. “Next Generation or Current Generation? : A Study of the OPACs of 260 Academic Libraries in the USA and Canada." Library Hi Tech, Vol.29, No.2(June 2011), pp.266-300.

13.

Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science, Vol.46, No.2(Feb. 2000), pp.186-204.

14.

Wilson, Katie. “OPAC 2.0 : Next Generation Online Library Catalogues Ride the Web 2.0 Wave!" Online Currents, Vol.21, No.10(2007), pp.406-413.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society