바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

세계인권선언서를 기저로 한 IFLA 선언서의 인권 개념 연구

A Study on the Concepts of Human Rights in IFLA Statements on the Basis of UDHR

한국도서관·정보학회지 / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2013, v.44 no.4, pp.5-28
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.4.201312.5
김선호 (대구대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구의 목적은 인권을 기저로 한 공공 도서관 서비스의 철학적 방향을 제안하는 것이다. 이 목적을 달성하기 위하여, 이 글에서는 세계인권선언서와 국제도서관연맹의 인권과 관련된 13개의 선언서의 주요개념을 질적 데이터 분석방법으로 비교 분석하였다. 분석결과, 국제도서관연맹의 선언서에서 강조하고 있는 가장 중요한 인권 개념은 1) 세계인권선언서 제 19조의 의견 및 표현의 자유, 그리고 정보접근의 자유, 2) 제 2조의 어떠한 이유로든 차별받지 않을 권리, 제 12조의 사생활보호의 권리, 그리고 제 26조의 교육 받을 권리, 3) 제 18조의 사상, 양심, 종교의 자유, 그리고 제 27조의 문화적 삶의 권리 순으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 토대로, 우리나라 도서관법에 추가해야할 인권의 개념을 제안하였다.

keywords
Human rights, Universal declaration on human rights, UDHR, International federation of library associations and institutions, IFLA, Library statements, Library services, Public library, 인권, 세계인권선언서, 국제도서관연맹, 도서관 선언, 도서관 서비스

Abstract

This study is to propose the philosophical direction of public library services based on human rights. To accomplish this purpose, this study comparatively analyzed key concepts from 13 statements related to IFLA as well as UDHR with the inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. The result shows that the most important concepts of human right emphasized from IFLA statements are 1) UDHR Article 19: Freedom of opinion and expression, and Freedom of information access, 2) Article 2: No distinction of any kind, Article 12: Privacy, and Article 26: Education, 3) Article 18: Freedom of thoughts, conscience and religion, and Article 27: Cultural life. From this result, this study finally suggests that the concept of human rights should be added to the Korean Library Law.

keywords
Human rights, Universal declaration on human rights, UDHR, International federation of library associations and institutions, IFLA, Library statements, Library services, Public library, 인권, 세계인권선언서, 국제도서관연맹, 도서관 선언, 도서관 서비스

참고문헌

1.

ALA. “ALA Policy Manual, B.2.1 Library Bill of Rights.” <http://www.ala.org/aboutala/governance/policymanual/updatedpolicymanual/section2/53intellfreedom#B.2.1> [2013. 10. 3].

2.

Byrne, Alex “Libraries and Democracies,” Keynote Paper for Seminar on Libraries and Democracy, Stockholm, 4(1999. Nov.) <http://archive.ifla.org/faife/papers/others/byrne3.htm> [cited 2013. 10. 3].

3.

Eryaman, Mustafa Yunus, “The Public Library as a Space for Democratic Empowerment: Henry Giroux, Radical Democracy, and Border Pedagogy.” in Critical theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from across the Disciplines, eds. G.J. Leckie, L.M. Given, and J.E. Buschman(Santa Barbara, Libraries Unlimited, c.2010), p.131-141.

4.

Harding, Olivering, “Literary Censorship and Infringement of Human Rights – Role Of The Librarian.” <http://ezinearticles.com/?Literrary-Censorship-And-Infringement-Of Human-Rights --- Role-Of-The Librarian...> [cited 2013. 9. 12].

5.

Human Rights Education Associates, “Simplified Version of the UDHR,” <http://www.hrea.org/index.php?doc_id=1> [cited 2013. 10. 7].

6.

McCook, Kathleen de la Pena, & Katharine J. Phenix, “Public Libraries and Human Rights,” Public Library Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1-2(2006), pp.57-73.

7.

Phenix, Katharine J., and Kathleen de la Pena McCook, “A Commitment to Human Rights-Let’s Honor the Qualities Required of a Librarian Dedicated to Human Rights,” Information for Social Change, Vol.25(2006) <http://www.libr.org/isc/issues/ISC25/articles/A%20COMMITMENT%20TO%20HUMAN%20RI GHTS.pdf> [2010. 10. 7].

8.

Samek, Toni(a), “Critical Librarianship: an interview with Toni Samek,” <http://bclaifc.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/critical-librarianship-an-interview-with-toni-samek/> [Cited 2013. 10. 7].

9.

Samek, Toni(b), Librarianship and Human Rights: A twenty-first century guide(Oxford:Chandos, c2007).

10.

Samek, Toni(c), “Internet AND Intention: An Infrastructure for Progressive Librarianship,” International Journal of Information Ethics, Vol.2(2004). <http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/002/ijie_002_23_samek.pdf> [2013. 10. 7].

11.

Samek, Toni(d), “Ethical Reflection on 21st Century Information Work: An Address to Teachers and Librarians,” Progressive Librarian, Vol.25(2005), pp.43-61.

12.

Thomas, David R., “A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis.” <http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/soph/centres/hrmas/_docs/inductive2003.pdf> [cited 2013. 9. 20].

13.

UN, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “United Nations Human Rights,” <http://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights.aspx> [cited 2013. 10. 3].

한국도서관·정보학회지