바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.46 No.4
Citation Share

한국목록규칙 4판 개정판의 구성 방안 연구

Suggestions for the Composition of KCR4 Revision

한국도서관·정보학회지 / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2015, v.46 no.4, pp.207-226
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.4.201512.207
도태현 (동의대학교)
도태현. (2015). 한국목록규칙 4판 개정판의 구성 방안 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 46(4), 207-226, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.4.201512.207
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

FRBR and FRAD model, ICP, RDA, NCR Revision are analyzed for the composition of KCR4 Revision. Based on the results, follows are suggested. 1) Entities are divided into work, expression, manifestation, item, person, family, corporate body, concept, object, event, place. 2) Entire cataloging rules are grouped into ‘attributes’ and ‘relationships’, and then ‘attributes’ is divided into attributes describing and access points constructing. 3) Attributes describing is divided into attributes describing of works, expressions, manifestations, items, persons, families, corporate bodies, and arranged as the sequence. 4) Access points constructing is divided into access points constructing of works, expressions, persons, families, corporate bodies, and arranged as the sequence. 5) ‘Relationships’ is divided into other relationships between group 1 entities, and relationships between persons, families and corporate bodies.

keywords
한국목록규칙, 목록규칙, 개체, 속성, 관계, KCR, Cataloging rules, Entities, Attributes, Relationships

참고문헌

1.

國立國會圖書館收集書誌部. 2014. 新しい 日本目錄規則 全體構成案について. <http://www.ndl.go.jp/jp/data/basic_policy/conference/bib_h25_ndlresume.pdf> [인용 2015. 11. 5].

2.

김정현. 2013. 한국목록규칙의 개정방향에 대한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지 , 44(4): 123-143.

3.

박진희. 2009. RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지 , 40(2):111-138.

4.

이미화. 2012. 국제목록원칙 2009 제정에 따른 한국목록규칙의 방향성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 46(2): 262-280.

5.

이미화. 2011. AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 28(1): 23-42.

6.

日本圖書館協會 目錄委員會. 2013. 日本目錄規則 改訂における NDLとの連携について.<http://www.jla.or.jp/Portals/0/data/iinkai/mokuroku/renkei.pdf> [인용 2015. 11. 13].

7.

日本圖書館協會 目錄委員會, 國立國會圖書館 收集書誌部. 2013. 「日本目錄規則」 改訂の基本方針. <http://www.jla.or.jp/Portals/0/data/iinkai/mokuroku/kihonhousin20130822.pdf> [인용 2015. 11. 5].

8.

韓國圖書館協會 目錄委員會 編. 2003. 韓國目錄規則 . 第4版. 서울 : 韓國圖書館協會.

9.

한국도서관협회 목록위원회 편. 2013. 韓國目錄規則 : 전자책·전자저널 기술규칙 . 제4판 보유편. 서울 : 韓國圖書館協會.

10.

古川 肇. 體現形·個別資料に對する典據形アクセスポイントはなぜ必要か. 2011. <http://ojs.inf.gscc.osaka-cu.ac.jp/TS/index.php/TS/article/viewFile/68/106> [인용 2012. 8. 8].

11.

IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 2009. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : Final Report. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf> [cited 2014. 8. 5].

12.

IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records(FRNAR). 2013. Functional Requirements for Authority Data : A Conceptual Model.<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2013.pdf> [cited 2014. 8. 5].

13.

ISBD Review Group. 2011. ISBD. Consolidated ed. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbd/isbd-cons_20110321.pdf> [cited 2015. 11. 9].

14.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA(JSC). 2010. RDA. Chicago:American Library Association.

15.

Statement of International Cataloguing Principles 2009. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf> [cited 2015. 11. 6].

16.

U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. 2011. Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. <http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf> [cited 2015. 10. 21]. 국한문 참고문헌의 영문 표기(English

한국도서관·정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책