This study intends to implement a OPAC prototype for digital kids. To the end, this study applies prototyping techniques that design, evaluate and improve an early sample model. Included in this study are as follows: (1) design a conceptual model of new OPACs based on the information need analysis of digital kids, (2) implement a OPAC prototype with WordPress 4.2 version, (3) evaluate the prototype OPAC from the viewpoint of digital kids and children librarians, and finally, (4) suggest the improved model and implementational strategies for kid's OPAC. 6 fourth and fifth graders in the elementary school and 5 children librarians in public libraries participate in the final evaluation process.
구중억, 이응봉. 2009. Open API 기반 메타 검색시스템의 사용성 평가에 관한 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 26(1): 185-214.
노지현. 2011. 어린이용 목록에 대한 공공도서관 사서의 인식. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 42(4):89-109.
노지현. 2013. 도서관목록 이용자의 집단별 특성과 차이에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 44(4): 421-442.
노지현. 2014. ‘디지털 키즈’를 위한 기존 OPAC의 한계와 과제. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 45(4): 337-364.
박정순, 신수길. 2006. 사용성 평가: 평가참여자가 과연 몇 명이면 충분할 것인가?. 『한국디지털디자인학회 춘계학술대회』. 2006년 5월. 경기: 용인대학교, 5-8.
유재옥. 2009. 『어린이자료 종합목록 개발 방안 연구』. 서울: 국립어린이청소년도서관.
이은주. 2014. 이용자 요구 기반의 도서관목록 구현에 관한 연구 : P대학도서관을 사례로 하여. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 48(3): 431-458.
정대율 외. 2007. 『정보시스템 분석 및 설계』. 서울 : 컴원미디어.
허원실. 2006. 『시스템 분석과 설계』. 서울 : 한빛미디어.
植松貞夫, 鈴木佳苗. 2011.『児童サービス論』. 東京: 樹村房.
Baauw, Ester and Panos Markopoulos. 2004. “A Comparison of Think-aloud and Post-task Interview for Usability Testing with Children.” Proceeding IDC '04 Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 115-116.
Bial, Dania and Joe Kirby. 2002. “Differences and Similarities in Information Seeking:Children and Adults as Web Users.” Information Processing and Management, 38: 649-670.
Bilal, Dania and Bachir, Imad. 2007. “Children's Interaction With Cross-Cultural and Multilingual Digital Libraries: I. Understanding Interface Design Representations.”Information Processing & Management, 43(1): 47-64.
Breeding, Marshall. 2015. Perceptions 2014: An International Survey of Library Automation. <http://librarytechnology.org/perceptions/2014/> [cited 2015. 8. 5].
Cooper, Linda Z. 2002. “A Case Study of Information-Seeking Behavior in 7-Year-Old Children in a Semistructed Situation.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11): 904-922.
Hoffman, Gretchen L. 2009. “Meeting Users' Needs in Cataloging: What is the Right Thing to Do?.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47: 631-641.
Hutchinson, Hilary Browne, Benjamin B. Bederson and Allison Druin. 2006. “The Evolution of the International Children’s Digital Library Searching and Browsing Interface.” Proceeding IDC '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 105-112.
Jeffries, Robin et al. 1991. “User Interface Evaluation in the Real World: A Comparison of Four Techniques.” Proceedings of CHI '91 ACM, 119-124.
Jochmann-Mannak, Hanna, Theo Huibers and Ted Sanders. 2008. “Children’s Information Retrieval: Beyond Examining Search Strategies and Interface.” In The 2nd BCS-IRSG Symposium: Future Directions in Information Access 2008. 64-72.
Karpuk, Deborah J. 2008. Kidzcat : a How-to-Do-it Manual for Cataloging Children s ’Materials and Instructional Resources. New York : Neal-Schuman.
Külper, Ute and Ursula Schulz. 1997. “Bücherschatz- a Prototype of a Children’s OPAC.” Information Services & Use, 17(2/3): 201-214.
Large, Andrew & Jamshid Beheshti. 2005. “Interface design, web portals, and children.”Library Trends, 54(2): 318–342.
Valacich, Joseph, Joey George and Jeffrey A. Hoffer. 2007. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design. N.J.: Prentice Hall.