바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.2
Citation Share

The Citation Analysis as a Research Method for Sociology of Knowledge

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
1999, v.30 no.2, pp.155-178
Lee Soo-Sang
Lee, S. (1999). The Citation Analysis as a Research Method for Sociology of Knowledge. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 30(2), 155-178.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Ciatation analysis is a information analysis method based on the phenomenon of citing previous documents in the source document. There are many well-known studies exploring citation analysis and it applications. This paper does not attempt to review this extensive area of applications, but to demonstrate the sociological aspect of citation analysis. Specifically, this paper have reviewed the citation analysis as a quantitative method for the studies of sociology of knowledge. For this, I have described various basic methods such as citation behavior, citation count, impact factor, citation relationship etc. And I have classified into four applied areas of sociology of knowledge; (1) flow of knowledge resources, (2) evaluation of knowledge resources, (3) evaluation of knowledge community, and (4) utilization in terms of knowledge policy. Finally, I have clarified the some limitations and shortcomings of citation analysis that have addressed by citation and citation analysis itself.

keywords

Reference

1.

E. Garfield. (1996). When To Cite. The Library Quarterley, 66(4), 449-458.

2.

김갑선. (1999). 인용동기와 인용환경요인 모형개발. 한국문헌정보학회지, 33(1), 67-86.

3.

Ziming Liu. (1997). Citation Theory in the Framework of International Flow of Information: New Evidence with Translation Analysis. JASIS, 48(1), 80-87.

4.

L. M. Baird & C. Oppenheim. (1994). Do citations matter?. Journal of Information Science, 20(1), 2-15.

5.

L. C. Smith. (1981). Citation Analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.

6.

E. Garfield. (1994). The Relationship Between Citing and Publication:A Question of Relatedness. Current Contents, .

7.

C. A. Schwartz.. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Uncitedness. College & Research Libraries, 58(1), 19-29.

8.

M. E. Soper. (1976). Characteristics and Use of Personal Collection. Library Quarterley, 46, 397-415.

9.

이가종. .

10.

이해영. (1995). 국가 과학기술정보 정책에 대한 인용분석 결과의 적용:전기·전자공학 분야를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 282, 109-133.

11.

김영민. .

12.

Deric de Soll Price;Eugene Garfield(complied by). Little Science, Big Science ... and Beyond.

13.

L. C. H. Westney. (1998). Historical Ranking of Science and Technology:A Citationist Perspective. The Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 1(1).

14.

윤석경. (1996). 연구업적 평가를 위한 인용분석 지표개발에 관한 연구. 사회과학논총, 7, 155-177.

15.

P. Alvarez;A. Pulgarin. (1997). Brief Communication:The Diffusion of Scientific Journals Analyzed through Citations. JASIS, 48(10), 953-958.

16.

민윤경. (1993). 인용분석의 이론적 고찰. 도서관학보, 11, 110-142.

17.

E. Garfield. (1990). How ISI Selects Journals for Coverage. Current Contents, 22.

18.

과학기술처. 97년도 과학기술 논문 국가별·기관별 발표 및 인용 현황-ISI의 NCR 및 NSI분석.

19.

S. P. Harter;T. E. Nisonger;A. Weng. (1993). Semantic Relationships Between Cited and Citing Articles in Library and Information Science Journals. JASIS, 44, 543-552.

20.

Robert Barsky;장영준(옮김). .

21.

T. A. Brooks. (1986). Evidence of Complex Citer Motivations. JASIS, 37(1), 34-36.

22.

E. Garfield. (1979). Is Citation Analysis A Legitimate Evaluation Tools?. Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.

23.

E. Garfield. (1998). Random Thought of Citationology Its Theory and Practice. Scientometrics, 43(1), 69-76.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy