The purpose of this study is offering appropriate system and training program to helf the system designer and the trainer in addition to analyze information use behavior about the web search tools and evaluate the estimated system by user groups. The results of the study are as follows <TEX>$\circledS1$</TEX> It is desirable to consider age than other demographic variables in the case of web search tool. <TEX>$\circledS2$</TEX> It is desirable to design Directory Search Tool in the case of web search tool which serves the student user group. <TEX>$\circledS3$</TEX> An Intelligent Search Tool is more appropriate for the students who are using keyword search tool than any other tools. <TEX>$\circledS4$</TEX> A discussion about standard classification of the web information should be accomplished soon because users feel confused in using web search tools due t o absence of standard mode of classification about classified item. <TEX>$\circledS5$</TEX> Librarians need the cognition about data on internet s a source of information and need positive service and user training program about these information because student users hardly get help from librarians or library orientation for learning method to use web search tool. <TEX>$\circledS6$</TEX> Internet use experience and years of computer use had effect on their use ability when using web search tool, whereas computer use experience, library use experience and Online Public Access Catalogs (OPAC) use experience had no effect on it. Especially, OPAC use experience had no effect on use ability of web search tool of student user group because student user groups had no information about internet and web search tool and they did not recognized the difference about search method between web search tool and OPAC. <TEX>$\circledS7$</TEX>In the case of web search tool, it si important to index the increasing web resource automatically by a searching robot. But in the case of student users, web search tool is much more needed to index by index expert due to the absence of ability about selecting and combining keyword.
이란주. (1997). 월드 와이드 웹(world wide web) 검색엔진의 효율적인 검색방법 고찰-Lycos, InfoSeek, 키워드형 탐색도구, Excite, 디렉토리형 탐색도구를 중심으로. 도서관, 52(2), 29-43.
강덕수. .
Criteria for Search Engine Evaluation. .
박일종. (1996). 문헌정보학과 WWW 홈페이지의 필요성과 준비에 관한 연구. 도서관학논집, 24(여름호), 413-448.
Notess, Greg R.. .
Chu, H.;M. Rosenthal. .
성기주. (1997). 인터넷 검색도구의 기능에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 14(2), 269-284.
Pollock, Annabel;Andrew Hockley. (1997). What's Wrong with Internet Searching. D-Lib Magazine, .
권군오. .
이은주. .
Courtois, Martin P.;William M. Baer;Marcella Stark. (1996). Cool Tools for Searching the Web:A Performance Evaluation. Online, 19(6), 15-32.
김태승. (1996). 정보시스템 개발자와 이용자간의 평가요소에 대한 비교연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(1), 143-168.
Park, II-jong K.. (1997). Comparing Major U.S. OPAC System for Developing Counties. Libri:International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, 47(4), 234-242.
김화수. 검색엔진 비교분석 및 한글 검색엔진 검색 정밀성 실험.
Koster, Martijn. .
이명희. (1997). 네트웍 데이터베이스에서의 주제별 디렉토리와 키워드 검색엔진의 검색효율에 관한 탐색적 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 31(2), 177-197.
이명희. (1998). 교육학 분야 주제전문가와 탐색전문가의 인터넷 검색엔진을 사용한 정보탐색행태 비교연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 32(2), 5-22.
이영자. (1998). 인터넷으로부터의 주제지향 정보자원의 수집 및 조직. 도서관학논집, 29, 65-103.
김성희. (1997). 인터넷상의 메타탐색엔진의 검색효율성 비교 연구. 도서관학논집, 27, 457-483.
김종태. .
Habib, David P.;Robert L. Balliot. .
Venditto, G.. (1996). Search Engine Showdown: IW Labs Tests Seven Internet Search Tools. Internet World, 7(5).
양영걸;안미정;옥철영. (1997). META검색엔진을 이용한 웹 로봇에 관한 연구. 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집, 24(2), 461-464.
Zorn, Peggy;Mary Emanoil;Lucy Marshall. (1996). Advanced Web Searching:Tricks of the Trade. Online, 20(3).
정영미;김성은. (1997). WWW탐색도구의 색인 및 탐색기능 평가에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 31(1), 154-184.
이란주;최경화. (1997). 국내 웹검색도구의 특성 및 탐색기능 평가에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 31(3), 75-108.