바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.2
Citation Share

Discourse Analysis in Library and Information Science Research

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2001, v.32 no.2, pp.269-288
장덕현
장덕현, (2001). Discourse Analysis in Library and Information Science Research. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 32(2), 269-288.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Library and information science(LIS) research, as reflected in its own disciplinary and professional history, has been ignorant of the transitions and developments of other humanities and social science disciplines. For instance, the positivistic perspectives in research have been maintained in the field while other disciplines have been experimenting wide variety of research methods and aspects. This paper attempts to articulate that LIS research should play an appropriate role in analyzing and investigating various key-words in modern knowledge society. In this regard it scrutinizes the applicability and implications of discourse analysis. It specifically surveys the historical background of the development of LIS research; then it explains the dimensions of discourse analysis and some principles; and, finally it shows some examples of research projects that emp1oy these perspectives.

keywords
연구방법론

Reference

1.

Bulter,Pierce;Dianne,J.Ellsworth(ed.);Norman,D.Stevens(ed.). Librarianship as a Profession.

2.

Foucault,Michel;Colin,Gordon(ed.). (1980). . Power/Knowlede: Selected Writings and other Interviews 1972-1977, .

3.

Harris,Michael,H.. (1986). The Dialectic of Defeat: Antinomies in Research in Library and Information Science. Library Trends, 34, 515-530.

4.

Van Dijk;Teun,A.. (1994). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249-283.

5.

김영기. .

6.

조(한)혜정. .

7.

Dreyfus,Hubert,L.;Paul Rainbow. .

8.

이수상. .

9.

Wiegand,Wayne A.. (1999). Tunnel Vision and Blind Spots: What the Past Tells US about the Present: Reflections on the Twentieth-Century History of American Librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 69, 1-32.

10.

Butler,Pierce. .

11.

Jones,Graham. (1976). The Incredible Stream of Garbage: The Library Journals, 1876-1975. The Indexer, 10, 9-14.

12.

김정근;장덕현. (1994). 우리나라 공공도서관 발전의 현단계에 관한 연구: 부산, 경남지역 공공도서관 사서의 일상적 의식세계에 대한 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 27, 1-73.

13.

Lynch,Beverly P.. Education and Training of Librarians.

14.

Fairclough,Norman. .

15.

Frohmann,Bernd. (1994). CommunicationTechnologies and the Politics of Postmodern Information Science. Canadian Journal of Informationand Library Science, 19, 1-22.

16.

김정근. .

17.

이소연. (0000). 대학도서관 조직문화에 대한 질적 연구 : 새천년 도서관 사례를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 34(4), 124-142.

18.

김종성. .

19.

Budd,John,M.;Douglas,Raber. (1996). Discourse Analysis: Method and Application in the Study of Information. Information Processing and Management, 32, 217-226.

20.

Frohmann,Bernd. (1992). The Power of Images: A Disourse Analysis of the Cognitive Viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 48, 365-386.

21.

Kuhn,Thomas S.. .

22.

Rubin,Richard E.. .

23.

Bender,Thomas;Thomas Bender(ed.);Carl Schorske(ed.). Politics,Intellect, and the American University.1945-1995.

24.

김정근. (1993). 사서직과 언어. 도서관소식, (3), 1-3.

25.

Forhmann,Bernd. Why Cutural Studies Matter to Information Studies.

26.

김정근. 한국의 대학도서관 무엇이 문제인가.

27.

Rayward,W.Boyd;Fritz Machlup(ed.);Una Mansfield(ed.). Library and Information Sciences Disciplinary Differentiation, Cpmpetition,Convergence.

28.

김정근;장덕현. (1999). 문헌정보학에 있어서 일상생활 연구의 방법론적 함의: 최근 연구동향을 중심으로. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 30, 55-75.

29.

Palmquist,Ruth A.. .

30.

Bourdieu,Pierre. .

31.

Forhmann,Bernd. (1994). Discourse Analysis as a Research Method in Library and Information Science. Library and Information Scicence Research, 16, 119-138.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy