- 권한신청
- P-ISSN2466-2542
- KCI
대학도서관 평가지표의 다의성과 지향성
Multiplicity of Moaning and Directivity of Evaluation Indicators for the Academic Libraries
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
오늘날 대학도서관은 공룡의 화신 내지 예산의 블랙홀로 인식되고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 대학 도서관은 디지털시대의 다양한 학술정보를 수집·보존하고 이용시키는 주체가 되어야 한다. 이것은 실물자료의 소장패러다임과 전자출판물의 접근패러다임을 동시에 수용하고 강화해야 한다는 의미이다. 이처럼 대학의 예산부담과 도서관의 기능강화 사이의 간극을 좁히려면 총체적 평가작업이 선행되어야 하고, 그 요체는 평가지표의 개발이다. 그래서 본 연구는 대학도서관 평가지표 또는 성과지표 (척도)의 다의성을 체계적으로 고찰하고, 그 바람직한 지향성을 모색하였다.
- keywords
- Performance Measures, Evaluation Indicator
Abstract
Today academic libraries have to show that they are using given resources for right purpose and in the best way. In order to reach this goal, academic libraries should develop the effective evaluation model. And carefully selected and used, performance measures or evaluation indicators are the most important tool the Library has to ensure goals and objectives are being accomplished. The purpose of this study is to understand a theoretical foundation for evaluation indicators of academic libraries, that is, its diverse(various) meanings and directivity.
- keywords
- Performance Measures, Evaluation Indicator
참고문헌
McClure, Charles R.. .
Steward, Jean;David Baker(ed.). Service Level Agreements and Performance Indicators.
Liu, Lewis Guodo. (2001). The Contribution of Library Collections to Prestige of Academic Programs of University : A Quantitative Analysis. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 25(1), 49-65.
Pritchard, Sarah M.. (1996). Determining Quality in Academic Library. Library Trends, 44, 572-594.
Rutgers University;National Center for Public Productivity. .
系賀雅兒. (2000). 圖書館ハ(?)フォ―マンス指標の背景と特徵. 現代の圖書館, 38(1), 21-29.
盧秀菊. .
Brophy, Peter;Peter M. Wynne. .
Kena, Jenny. .
Lakos, Amos. (1999). The Missing Ingredient : Culture of Assessment in Libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 1(1), 3-7.
McLean, N.;C. Wilde. (1991). Evaluating Library Performance : The Search for Relevance?. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 22(3), 198-210.
Sink, D. (1991). The Role of Measurement in Achieving World Class Quality and Productivity Management. Industrial Engineering, 23(6), 23-28.
MacDougall, Alan. (1991). Performance Assessment : Today's Confusion, Tomorrow's Solution. IFLA Journal, 7(4), 371-378.
Library Association;Colleges of Further and Higher Education Group. .
Crawford, John. .
Chen, Tser-yieth. (1997). An Evaluation of the Relative Performance of University Libraries in Taipei. OCLC System & Services, 13(4), 164-172.
Barnetson, Bob;Marc Cutright. (2000). Performance Indicators as Conceptual Technologies. Higher Education, 40, 277-292.
Kokkonen, Oili. .
Gedeon, J. A.;R. E. Rubin. (1999). Attribution Theory and Academic Library Performance Evaluation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 18-25.
Saracevic, Tefko. (2000). Digital Library Evaluation : Toward and Evolution of Concepts. Library Trends, 49(3), 350-369.
윤희윤. (1998). 대학도서관 경영규모의 경제성 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 32(2), 143-167.
衫山誠司. (2000). 私立大學圖書における館經營改革としての自己點檢·評價活動. 現代の圖書館, 38(1), 10-20.
Van House, N. A.;B. T. Weil;C. R. McClure. .
홍현진;이용남. (1999). 공공도서관 경영규모의 경제성 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 33(2), 45-67.
Kebede, G.. (1999). Performance Evaluation in Library and Information Systems of Developing Countries : A Study of the Literature. Libri, 49(2), 106-119.
Poll, Roswitha;Peter te Boekhorst. .
International Organization for Standardization. .
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수