바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.3
Citation Share

Multiplicity of Moaning and Directivity of Evaluation Indicators for the Academic Libraries

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2001, v.32 no.3, pp.91-115
윤희윤
윤희윤, (2001). Multiplicity of Moaning and Directivity of Evaluation Indicators for the Academic Libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 32(3), 91-115.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Today academic libraries have to show that they are using given resources for right purpose and in the best way. In order to reach this goal, academic libraries should develop the effective evaluation model. And carefully selected and used, performance measures or evaluation indicators are the most important tool the Library has to ensure goals and objectives are being accomplished. The purpose of this study is to understand a theoretical foundation for evaluation indicators of academic libraries, that is, its diverse(various) meanings and directivity.

keywords
Performance Measures, Evaluation Indicator

Reference

1.

McClure, Charles R.. .

2.

Steward, Jean;David Baker(ed.). Service Level Agreements and Performance Indicators.

3.

Liu, Lewis Guodo. (2001). The Contribution of Library Collections to Prestige of Academic Programs of University : A Quantitative Analysis. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 25(1), 49-65.

4.

Pritchard, Sarah M.. (1996). Determining Quality in Academic Library. Library Trends, 44, 572-594.

5.

Rutgers University;National Center for Public Productivity. .

6.

系賀雅兒. (2000). 圖書館ハ(?)フォ―マンス指標の背景と特徵. 現代の圖書館, 38(1), 21-29.

7.

盧秀菊. .

8.

Brophy, Peter;Peter M. Wynne. .

9.

Kena, Jenny. .

10.

Lakos, Amos. (1999). The Missing Ingredient : Culture of Assessment in Libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 1(1), 3-7.

11.

McLean, N.;C. Wilde. (1991). Evaluating Library Performance : The Search for Relevance?. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 22(3), 198-210.

12.

Sink, D. (1991). The Role of Measurement in Achieving World Class Quality and Productivity Management. Industrial Engineering, 23(6), 23-28.

13.

MacDougall, Alan. (1991). Performance Assessment : Today's Confusion, Tomorrow's Solution. IFLA Journal, 7(4), 371-378.

14.

Library Association;Colleges of Further and Higher Education Group. .

15.

Crawford, John. .

16.

Chen, Tser-yieth. (1997). An Evaluation of the Relative Performance of University Libraries in Taipei. OCLC System & Services, 13(4), 164-172.

17.

Barnetson, Bob;Marc Cutright. (2000). Performance Indicators as Conceptual Technologies. Higher Education, 40, 277-292.

18.

Kokkonen, Oili. .

19.

Gedeon, J. A.;R. E. Rubin. (1999). Attribution Theory and Academic Library Performance Evaluation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 18-25.

20.

Saracevic, Tefko. (2000). Digital Library Evaluation : Toward and Evolution of Concepts. Library Trends, 49(3), 350-369.

21.

윤희윤. (1998). 대학도서관 경영규모의 경제성 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 32(2), 143-167.

22.

衫山誠司. (2000). 私立大學圖書における館經營改革としての自己點檢·評價活動. 現代の圖書館, 38(1), 10-20.

23.

Van House, N. A.;B. T. Weil;C. R. McClure. .

24.

홍현진;이용남. (1999). 공공도서관 경영규모의 경제성 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 33(2), 45-67.

25.

Kebede, G.. (1999). Performance Evaluation in Library and Information Systems of Developing Countries : A Study of the Literature. Libri, 49(2), 106-119.

26.

Poll, Roswitha;Peter te Boekhorst. .

27.

International Organization for Standardization. .

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy