바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.39 No.3
Citation Share

A Comparative Study on the Knowledge Classification and Library Classification System of Botany

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2008, v.39 no.3, pp.369-386
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.3.200809.369

(2008). A Comparative Study on the Knowledge Classification and Library Classification System of Botany. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(3), 369-386, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.3.200809.369
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is investigate to compare with knowledge classification and library classification system of botany. First, the knowledge field of botany is mainly classified in morphology, physiology, ecology, taxonomy, genetics, evolution and others by the study object of plants. Second, the division of plants is treated in the field of taxonomy, that is, a lower subdivision study of botany, and Engler's classification is still prevalent in the taxonomy. Third, in library classification, KDC, NDC, UDC and CC adopted the Engler's classification, but DDC and LCC was taken of the Bentham & Hooker's classification. In the Engler's classification, plants are arranged by evolution's order, from lower vegetation to higher vegetation, but Bentham & Hooker's classification is arranged in the reverse order. Forth, it is desirable that every plants(482-489) of KDC' botany are subdivided by the attribute or structure of plants being treated in the general botany as if they are subdivided in the DDC or CC.

keywords
식물학분류, 식물분류, 학문분류, 문헌분류, 한국십진분류법, Botanical Classification, Plant Taxonomy, Knowledge Classification, Library Classification, KDC, Botanical Classification, Plant Taxonomy, Knowledge Classification, Library Classification, KDC

Reference

1.

김정현, (2001) 식물학문헌을 위한 자동분류시스템의 개발, 한국도서관정보학회지

2.

박정길, (1998) 植物學의 學問分類體系와 文獻分類 展開에 대한 考察, 경성대학교 논문집: 인문사회과학 인문편

3.

설성수, (2000) 지식활동분류의 이론과 실제, 대전 : 한남대학교

4.

李惟性, (2002) 現代植物分類學, 2차개정증보판, 祐成

5.

李昌福 , (2002) 植物分類學,新稿版, 鄕文社

6.

任?彬 , (2000) 一般植物學,四稿版, 鄕文社

7.

정연경, 학문분류, 문헌분류, 연구분류에 관한 비교 분석, 社會科學

8.

이화여자대학교 사회과학연구소, (1999) 硏究論叢, 硏究論叢

9.

韓國圖書館協會, (1996) 韓國十進分類法, 第四版. 2 vols, 韓國圖書館協會

10.

韓國圖書館協會, (1997) 改正第4版 韓國十進分類法解說, 韓國圖書館協會

11.

山田泰嗣, (1989) 新しい分類法の原理を求めて: 生物の分類と圖書の分類の接點, 同志社大學圖書館學年報

12.

日本圖書館協會, (1995) 日本十進分類法, 新訂9版. 2 vols, 日本圖書館協會

13.

中村武久., (1983) 植物分類と分類學: その發展, 經緯の中から, 日本農學圖書館協會會報

14.

川村敬一., (1991) 生物分類學と圖書分類學のかなたへ: 中尾佐助氏の普遍分類學に學んで, 醫學圖書館

15.

Chan, Lois Mai et al., (1996) Dewey Decimal Classification a Practical Guide, 2nd ed, New York : Forest Press

16.

Dewey, Melvil., (2003) Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, 22th ed. 4 vols, New York : Forest Press

17.

Judd, W.S. et al., (2005) 식물분류학: 계통학적 접근, 제2판, 신일상사

18.

Marcella, Rita, (1994) A New Manual of Classification, Brookfield : Gower

19.

Ranganathan, S. R., (1989) Colon Classification, 7th ed, Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science

20.

Supper LCCS, (1995) Gale's Library of Congress Classification Schedules, Combined with Additions and Changes Through 1995. Class QK, Botany. Detroit : Gale Research,

21.

UDC, (2005) Universal Decimal Classification, Standard edition. 2 vols, London : British Standards Institution

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy