바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.39 No.4
Citation Share

Developing a Methodology for Designing Metadata Application Profiles:Applied to Korea Art and Culture Education Service

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2008, v.39 no.4, pp.353-376
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.353



& (2008). Developing a Methodology for Designing Metadata Application Profiles:Applied to Korea Art and Culture Education Service. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 353-376, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.353
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to develop a methodology for designing metadata application profiles(AP) and to design a comprehensive AP for Korea Art and Education Service(KACES). The process of developing a methodology is divided into three steps, analysis of standard metadata schema, analysis of user needs, and content analyses. Metadata principles and guidelines were utilized in designing a KACES AP along with the developed methodology in this study. This paper describes what role the methodology developed here plays in devising metadata elements. The paper also discusses the benefits of three methods for AP design. The study has values in that it provides implications for designing APs for other domains.

keywords
Application Profile Design, Metadata Design Methodology, Content Analysis, Means-Ends Analysis, Application Profile Design, Metadata Design Methodology, Content Analysis, Means-Ends Analysis, 메타데이터 설계, 방법론, 콘텐트 분석법, 수단-목적 분석

Reference

1.

Andreas Aschenbrenner, (2004) A Methodology for Metadata Modeling-Depth for a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata Across Languages and Cultures

2.

Emma Tonkin, (2007) A User-centered Approach to Metadata Design, Lecture Notes in Computer Science

3.

Brian Fitzgerald., Systems Design Methodologies: A Need for New Canons, Executive Systems Research Centre Working Paper Series

4.

Peter Lloyd, (2000) Storytelling and the Development of Discourse in the Engineering Design Process, Design Studies

5.

Ji-Ye Mao, (2001) User-centred Design Methods in Practice: A Survey of the State of the Art, Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research

6.

Gunnar Johannsen, (2001) nalysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems, Proceedings of 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium

7.

Jean Aitchison, (2000) Thesaurus Construction and Use: a Practical Manual, 4th ed, Chicago : Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers

8.

Rachel Heery, (2008) Application Profiles: Mixing and Matching Metadata Schemas, 2000, <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue25/app-profiles/intro.html>,

9.

E. Duval et al., Metadata Principles and Practicalities," D-Lib Magazine, Vol.8, No.4,

10.

Leonard Will, (2004) Thesaurus consultancy, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly

11.

임은주 ; 김성희, (2005) 멀티미디어 내용표현을 위한 메타데이터 비교？분석, 한국도서관·정보학회지

12.

MODS, Uses and Features,

13.

N. Friesen, Building a better LOM? ISO Metadata for Learning Resources,

14.

곽승진, (2004) 청소년 과학정보 메타데이터 요소 및 데이터베이스 구축 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

15.

조윤희, (2003) 문화콘텐츠 통합을 위한 메타데이터 포맷 연구, 정보관리학회지

16.

VRA Core 4.0 Introduction, (2008) <http://www.vraweb.org/projects/vracore4/VRA_Core4_Intro.pdf>,

17.

R. P. Weber, Basic Content Analysis(Thousand : Sage Publication, 1999), Outline of Elements and Attributes in MODS Version 3.3,

18.

Chiara Fox, (2006) Content analysis: Methods and Mentoring, ASIS&T IA Summit

19.

Birger Hjørland, (1995) Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science

20.

Stuart Sutton, (2004) Digital Library Infrastructure: Metadata and the Education Domain, Chicago : American Library Association

21.

Liz Bishoff, (2004) Building Heritage Colorado: The Colorado digitization experience, Chicago : American Library Association

22.

Jens Rasmussen, (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley series in system engineering, New York: Wiley

23.

Kim J. Vicente, (1994) Cognitive work analysis toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

24.

Moira Chin, (1999) Penelope Sanderson and Marcus Watson. “Cognitive work analysis of the command and control work domain, Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, United States Naval War College

25.

M. A. Pejtersen, (1998) A framework for Work Centered Evaluation and Design: A case Study of IR on the Web, Working Paper for Mira Workshop

26.

더블린코어 네임스페이스, xmlns:dcterms=“http://purl.org/dc/terms/,

27.

LOM 네임스페이스, xmlns:lom=“http://ltsc.ieee.org/xsd/LOM,

28.

한국문화예술진흥원 네임스페이스, xmlns:artE=“http://www.artE.or.kr/terms/,

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy