바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Analysis of the Trends in the Field Studies of Library and Information Science in Korea

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2011, v.42 no.2, pp.171-191
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.171


Abstract

This study analyzed how the field study has been done in the aspects of the quantity of the research works, research subjects, researchers, the organizations which supported the research expenses and so on by going through the 2,165 research papers of the leading scholarly journals in the field of Library and Information Science published in the recent 10 years. The study shows that the number of the field studies is 691 and it comprises 31.9% of the total research papers. Classifying the field studies by the types of the subject libraries, the ones about the public libraries comprise the largest proportion(35.6%) of the total papers by the number of 246. Classifying the field works by the topics, the studies on the library administration comprise the largest proportion(47.5%) of the total field studies by the number of 328. They are followed by the research on the information services, information systems and digital libraries, and finally the reading education in the listed order. Classifying the field works by the authors, the professors have written the most papers whose number is 329 and which comprise 47.6% of the total research papers. When it comes to supporting the research expenses, 145 studies were supported by the universities. and they comprise the definitely largest proportion(74.4%) of the total 195 articles supported from some organizations.

keywords
Library & Information Science, Field Studies, Field Research, Research Methodology, Research Subject, Research Trend, Content Analysis, 문헌정보학, 현장연구, 연구방법론, 연구주제, 연구동향, 내용분석

Reference

1.

1) 오세훈, “우리나라 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 및 인용문헌 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구," 정보관리학회지, 제22권 제3호(2005), pp.379-408.

2.

2) 김용근, “대학도서관이 당면하고 있는 현실적인 문제," 한국도서관․정보학회지, 제34권, 제2호(2003), p.302.

3.

3) D. Koufogiannakis, Linda Slater, Ellen Crumley, “A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research," Journal of Information Science, Vol.30, No.3(2004), pp.227-239.

4.

이철기, 현장연구 쉽게하기(서울 : 휴먼스, 2003), p.19.

5.

배장오, 현장연구방법(고양 : 서현사, 2008), pp.18-19.

6.

6) 한국도서관협회, 한국도서관연감(서울 : 도서관협회, 2010).

7.

9) 김영기, “한국 문헌정보학의 현실적합성과 실천성," 한국문헌정보학회지, 제34권, 제2호(2000), pp.191-209.

8.

양재한, “우리 문헌정보학의 실천성 확보를 위한 반성적 고찰," 한국도서관․정보학회지, 제31권, 제4호(2000), pp.91-110.

9.

10) 조인숙, “문헌정보학분야 연구성과의 활용실태분석," 정보관리학회지, 제12권, 제 2호(1995), pp.193-212.

10.

12) 김용근, “한국 사서직에 대하여,” 한국도서관․정보학회지, 제36권, 제1호(2006), p.12.

11.

14) 최성진, “광복50년과 도서관의 세계화,” 제33회 전국도서관대회 주제발표자료집(1995), p.7.

12.

16) 김정근, “한국문헌정보학의 위상정립과 교수협의회의 역할; 우리 학문의 실천성 문제와 관련하여,” 1996년도 한국문헌정보학 교수협의회 정기총회 및 하계세미나 발표요지 1996년 6월 21일 -22일; 유성호텔, p.10.

13.

18) 최성진, ‘한국문헌정보학에 대하여,’ 창사이춘희교수 정년기념논총(서울 : 경인문화사, 1993), pp.100-101.

14.

19) 이명희, “내용분석법에 의한 문헌정보학 학술지 연구논문 분석," 한국문헌정보학회지, 제36권, 제3호(2002), p.297.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society