바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.43 No.1
Citation Share

The CAbAT Modeling of Library User Context Information Applying Activity Theory

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2012, v.43 no.1, pp.221-239
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.1.201203.221


& (2012). The CAbAT Modeling of Library User Context Information Applying Activity Theory. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(1), 221-239, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.1.201203.221
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The information that has been created according to the complex environment and usage pattern of library user can provide context-aware information service through knowledge structuralization on whether it is a suitable situation for user. Accordingly, the development of a context model for defining the various contexts of library user and for the structuralization of interrelated context information is an essential requirement. This study examined the context concept and context modeling, and utilizing the concept of Activity Theory by Engestrom, the activity model of library user was designed as 1) subject, 2) object, 3) tools, 4) divison of labor, 5) community, and 6) rules. In addition, for the purpose of analyzing the context of library user, activity information was tracked to utilize the Shadow Tracking for observing and recording their forms, and the methodology of CAbAT (Context Analysis based on Activity Theory) was utilized for the collected activity information to analyze the user context model.

keywords
User activity, Context, Context model, Activity theory, CAbAT, Engestrom, 이용자 행위, 컨텍스트, 컨텍스트 모델, 행위이론, 행위 기반 컨텍스트 모델링

Reference

1.

A. K. Dey, D. Salber, and G. D. Abowd, “A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications," Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.16, No.2-4(2001), pp.100-104.

2.

Donald O. Case, Looking for Information: a Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior(San Diego : Academic Press, 2002), pp.123-140.

3.

임소연, 정지홍, “컨텍스트 분류를 위한 여행자 행위 수집에 관한 연구," 한국디자인학회 가을학술발표대회 논문집 (2005), p.116.

4.

이승근, 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경을 위한 온톨로지 기반 상황 인식 서비스 미들웨어(인하대학교 박사학위논문, 2006), pp.7-38.

5.

장세이, 우운택, “유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 컨텍스트 인식 및 컨텍스트 인식 응용 서비스 제작 기술," 한국정보기술학회지, 제1권, 제1호(2003), pp.59-64.

6.

B. Schilit, N. Adams, and R, Want, “Context-Aware Computing Applications," 1st International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications(1994), pp.85-90.

7.

A, K. Dey, and G. D. Abowd, “Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness," Proceedings of the CHI2000 Workshop on the What, Who, Where, When, and How of Context-Awareness(2000), pp.304-307.

8.

S. Jang., and W. Woo, “Ubi-UCAM: A Unified Context-Aware Application Model," Modeling and Using Context (2003), pp.178-189.

9.

김은회, 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경에서 상황인지를 지원하기 위한 시멘틱 컨텍스트 모델(박사학위논문, 숭실대학교 대학원 컴퓨터학과, 2006), pp.27-43.

10.

송재구, 김석수, “유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 정보관리를 위한 컨텍스트 기반의 데이터 모델링", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제6권, 제3호(2006), pp.56-58.

11.

김한준, 최종규, 지용구, “행위이론에 기초한 맥락 분석에 관한 연구," 대한인간공학회 춘계 학술대회(2009), pp.250-255.

12.

J. Lantolf. “Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art," Studies in Second Language Acquision, Vol. 28, No. 1(2006), pp.67-109.

13.

Y. Engestrom and R. Miettinen, Perspectives on Activity Theory. Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation(Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp.19-39.

14.

임소연, 정지홍. “컨텍스트 분류를 위한 여행자 행위 수집에 관한 연구," 한국디자인학회 가을학술발표대회 논문집 (2005), pp.116-117.

15.

V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi, Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design(MA : MIT Press, 2006), pp.15-28.

16.

L. Bannon and V. Kaptelinin, “From human–computer interaction to computer-mediated activity, User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools," Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2000), pp.183–202.

17.

Y. Engeström and Miettinen, “Introduction’ in Perspectives on Activity theory," (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 23-53.

18.

Y. Engeström, Learning by Expanding: an Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research(Helsinki : Orienta-Konsultit, 1987), pp.143-234.

19.

J. M. Carroll, HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science(CA, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003), pp.11-26.

20.

B. Nardi, “Concepts of cognition and consciousness: Four voices," Australian Journal of Information Systems, Vol.4(1996), pp.64-69.

21.

김한준, 최종규, 지용구, “행위이론에 기초한 맥락 분석에 관한 연구," 대한인간공학회 춘계 학술대회(2009), pp.250-254.

22.

D. M. Fetterman. Ethnography: Step-by-Step(California : Sage Publications, Inc, 2010), pp.5-11.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy