바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.43 No.1

Citation Share

A Study on the User Task in Resource Description & Access

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2012, v.43 no.1, pp.99-122
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.1.201203.99

(2012). A Study on the User Task in Resource Description & Access. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(1), 99-122, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.1.201203.99

Abstract

This study deals with the user task that is the goal of development of RDA(Resource Description & Access), an international standard for future bibliographic description. RDA seeks to implement the user task based on FRBR-FRAD model. User task could be composed of two areas: (1) find, identify, select, and obtain of bibliographic resources in information seeking and (2) find, identify, clarify, and understand of entities related to resources (i.e., person, family, corporate, concept, etc.). This research analyzes how the resource is defined with entity, attributes, and relationship in RDA based on the conceptual model of FRBR- FRAD. And this finally shows the ways of supporting user task in RDA.

keywords
Resource description & access, RDA, User task, User need, 자원기술과 접근, RDA, 이용자 과업, 이용자 요구

Reference

1.

谷口祥一, 緣川信之. 지식자원의 메타데이터, 최석두, 한상길 옮김. 서울 : 한울, 2011.

2.

박진희. “RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구,” 한국도서관정보학회지, 제40권, 제2호(2009.6), pp.111-138.

3.

이미화. “AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구,” 정보관리학회지, 제28권, 제1호(2011.3), pp.23-42.

4.

이미화. “MARC 데이터의 RDA 저작 및 표현형 요소 분석을 통한 한국목록규칙 및 KORMARC의고려사항,” 한국도서관정보학회지, 제41권, 제2호(2010. 6), pp.251-272.

5.

정옥경. “RDA의 접근점제어데이터의 지침과 지시에 대한 연구,” 인천전문대학논문집, 제51집(2009), pp.344-362.

6.

조재인. “RDA 구현 시나리오와 서지 제어의 장래에 대한 고찰,” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제43권, 제3호(2009. 9), pp.85-105.

7.

Cutter, Charles A. Rules for a Printed Dictionary Catalog, 4th ed. Washington, D.C. : Government Printing Office, 1904.

8.

IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Munich : Saur, 1998. <www.ifla.org/en/publications/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/> [cited 2012. 1. 15].

9.

IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records(FRANAR), Functional Requirements of Authority Data : A Conceptual Model. Munich : Saur, 2009.

10.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA, RDA : Resource Description & Access. Chicago : American Library Association, 2010.

11.

Joint Steering Committee for Revision AACR. Annual Report 2004.

12.

Library of Congress. RDA refresher training at LC : Overview, core elements, reminders, and changes: sessions for former testers Information. <http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/ Refresher_training_oct_2011.html> [cited 2011. 12. 10].

13.

Library of Congress. LC RDA Refresher Training: Exercise Information. <http://www.loc.gov/ aba/rda/Refresher_training_oct_2011.html> [cited 2011. 12. 10].

14.

Oliver, Chris. Introducing RDA : A Guide to the Basics. ALA Edition. Chicago : American Library Association, 2010.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy