Currently, most academic libraries provide OPAC 2.0 service which applies Web 2.0 based-internet search engine to OPAC. The new service is for the users' convenience and so the considerations for the users' opinions are of great importance for each of services. The objectives of the study were to investigate perceptions of the students as the main user for academic library on the importance for the main services of OPAC 2.0 and analyzed information sources and the reasons for book search by the virtue of this service. The study showed that there were the users' high expectations on accuracy and satisfaction for OPAC 2.0, and the main searching information source was the OPAC of the universities to which the users belong due to familiar screen as well as convenient reading and book loan through it. The OPAC 2.0 service needs to be improved with the consideration of the users' opinions.
구중억, 곽승진. “차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구.” 한국비블리아학회지, 제18권,제2호(2007), pp.61-82.
구중억, 이응봉. “북마크릿을 활용한 LibraryLookup 서비스 제공방안에 관한 연구.” 정보관리학회지,제23권, 제3호(2006), pp.49-66.
김태수. 문헌정보학용어사전. 서울 : 한국도서관협회(2010).
노지현. “정보환경의 변화와 도서관목록의 현단계.” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제36권, 제3호(2002), pp.133-153.
박미성. “Web 2.0 기술 적용 사이트 분석을 통한 도서관 정보시스템의 활용방안에 관한 연구.” 한국도서관․정보학회지, 제39권, 제1호(2008), pp.139-168.
박수희. 대학도서관 온라인열람목록의 이용자 인터페이스 분석. 석사학위논문, 숙명여자대학교 교육대학원, 1996.
이동규. 대학도서관 웹 기반 온라인목록의 이용특성에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 경기대학교 대학원문헌정보학과, 2003.
Blyberg, John. The Social OPAC™, 2008. <http://www.thesocialopac.net/> [cited 2011. 12. 13].
Breeding, Marshall. “Thinking about Your Next OPAC.” Computers in Libraries, Vol.27, No.4(2007), pp.28-30.
Breeding, Marshall. “Next-Generation Library Catalogs.” Library Technology Reports, Vol.43, No.4(2007).
Breeding, Marshall. Next Generation User Interfaces: Delivering content and services for today's Web-savvy library patrons, 20008. <http://www.senylrc.org/Marshall_nextgen_interfaces.ppt> [cited 2011. 12. 13].
Campbell, D. G. and Fast, K. V. “Panizzi, Lubetzky and Google: How the Modern Web Environment is Reinventing the Theory of Cataloguing.” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, Vol.28, No.3(2004), pp.25-38.
Casey, Michael. Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's User:Chap2. Looking Toward Catalog 2.0. Libraries Unlimited, 2007.
Hildreth, C. R. Pursuing the ideal: generations of online catalogs. In Aveney, B., Butler, B(Eds), Online catalogs, Online Reference, Converging Trends(Chicago : AmericanLibrary Association), 1984.
Hildreth, C. R. Advancing toward the E3 OPAC: the imperative and the path, In Van Pulis, N (Eds), Think Thank on the Present and Future of the Online Catalog. Proceedings (ALA Midwinter Meeting, Chicago, January 11-12), Reference and Adult Services Division, American Library Association, 1991.
IFLA. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles, 2008.<http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/icc/imeicc-statement_of_principles-2008.pdf>[cited 2011. 12. 26].
Large, A. and Beheshti, J. “OPACs: a research review.” Library and Information Science Research, Vol.19, No.2(1997), pp.111-133.
NCSU Libraries. Usability Research Lab: NCSU Libraries, 2006.<http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/usability/> [cited 2011. 12. 22].
NCSU Libraries. NCSU Libraries Online Catalog, 2008.<http://www.lib.nscu.edu/catalog/> [cited 2011. 12. 22].
Pattern, D. “Are you happy with your Opac?” Library & Information Update, Vol.6, No.10(2007), pp.32-34.
Schneider, Karen G. How OPACs Suck, Part2: The Checklist of Shame, 2006. http://www.techsource.ala.org/blog/2006/04/how-opacs-suck-part2-the-checklistof- shame.html> [cited 2011. 12. 13].
Wilson, Katie. “OPAC 2.0: Next generation online library catalogues ride the Web 2.0 wave!” Online Currents, Vol.21. No.10(2007), pp.406-413.