바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.43 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on Direction of Authority Control by Surveying the Authority Control in University Libraries

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2012, v.43 no.3, pp.5-26
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.5

(2012). A Study on Direction of Authority Control by Surveying the Authority Control in University Libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 5-26, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.5

Abstract

This study is to find the new method for authority control in Korea by surveying status of authority control in university libraries and by analyzing international conceptual model of authority control and VIAF. 2 kinds of survey were done: one is for libraries having authority records and the other is for libraries not having authority records. In survey result, libraries that have authority records want to sustain their own forms of authorized access points and libraries that have no authority records want the rules related to authority and the national cooperative authority control system to be constructed. Based on ICP 2009, FRAD conceptual model, VIAF and this survey result, new authority control is to respect the diversity of forms of the authorized access points. New authority control is to permit authority records that reflect provision for linguistic or cultural environments of each library, confirming to the national cataloging code. Therefore, authorized access points will be displayed according to user preferred forms. For this new authority control, it is needed to make national authority rule, to build the authority records according to library's own rules, and to construct the cooperative authority control system. Also for user preferred authority control, it is needed to describe detailed elements for authority control and relation data between authorized access points, between authorized access points and variant forms. This study could contribute to suggest new authority control that could accept all kinds of authorized access points preferred by nation, libraries, and users.

keywords
전거제어, 전거통제, 가상국제전거파일, 전거데이터의 기능요건, 제어형접근점, 전거형, 이형, 국제목록원칙 2009, 이용자 중심의 전거제어, Authority control, VIAF, FRAD, Controlled access point, Authorized access point, Variant form, ICP 2009, User centered authority control

Reference

1.

기민도. “국립중앙도서관 전거파일 구축 현황과 계획.” 국가전거파일의 협력적 구축방안(국립중앙도서관 열린정책세미나, 2006), pp.99-116.

2.

김태수. “전거제어시스템 개발.” 한국도서관정보학회 하계학술발표회, 1998, pp.1-12.

3.

도태현. “자동화 목록에서의 전거통제.” 한국도서관정보학회 도서관학논집, 제18권(1991, 1), pp.217-243.

4.

박선희. “대학도서관 전거파일 구축현황: 서울대학교 도서관을 중심으로.” 국가전거파일의 협력적구축방안(국립중앙도서관 열린정책세미나, 2006), pp.83-95.

5.

심경. “국내 공공도서관의 인명 전거제어의 현황 및 발전 방향.” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제40권, 제4호(2006, 12), pp.221-244.

6.

안영희, 이성숙. “IFLA FRAD 모형이 관련 표준에 미친 영향 연구.” 정보관리학회지, 제26권 제1호(2009), pp.279-303.

7.

오동근. “한국형 전거데이터베이스시스템의 개발에 관한 연구.” 한국도서관정보학회지, 제31권, 제4호(2000, 12), pp21-47.

8.

윤정옥. “디지털 정보시대의 전거통제(2) : 국내 목록 데이터 베이스의 일본 학술지명과 단체명 연구.” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제35권, 제4호(2001, 12), pp.161-175.

9.

이미화. “국제목록원칙 2009 제정에 따른 한국목록규칙의 방향성에 관한 연구.” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제46권, 제2호(2012, 5), pp.261-280

10.

이석형, 곽승진. “FRAD 개념 모형 기반의 학술논문 전거데이터 구조에 관한 연구.” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제45권, 제3호(2011), pp.235-257.

11.

이지원, 김태수. “SRU 프로토콜을 이용한 접근점제어 시스템의 구축과 활용에 관한 연구.” 정보관리학회지, 제22권, 제1호(2005, 3), pp.229-248.

12.

최달현. “분담목록에서의 전거통제와 전거파일 공유.” 한국도서관정보학회 도서관학논집, 제25권(1997, 1), pp.257-293.

13.

최석두. “무전거시스템에 관한 연구.” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제25권(1993. 12), pp.233-264.

14.

Bennett, R, C. Hengel-Dittrich, E. O'Neill, & B. Tillett. “VIAF (Virtual International Authority File): Linking Die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress Name Authority Files.” IFLA Conference Proceedings, 2006, pp.1-17.

15.

Burke, S. K. & J. Shorten. “Name authority work today: comparison of types of academic libraries.” LRTS, Vol.54, No.1(2009), pp.4-20.

16.

Gorman, M. “Authority control in the context of bibliographic control in the electronic environment.” CCQ, Vol.38, No.3-4(2004), pp.11-22.

17.

IME ICC. “Statement of International Cataloging Principles.” 2009.<http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf> [cited 2011. 10. 2].

18.

Mak, L. “Issues of personal name authority control in a retrospective cataloging project.” Technical services Quarterly, Vol.28(2011), pp.160-168.

19.

Naito, E. “Names of the far east: Japanese, Chinese, and Korean authority control.” CCQ, Vol.38, No.3-4(2004), pp.251-268.

20.

OCLC. “Expanding the concept of universal bibliographic control : VIAF.” 2009.<http://www.oclc.org/services/brochures/213998usf_virtual_international_authority_file_VIAF.pdf> [cited 2011. 10. 2].

21.

OCLC. “VIAF.” <http://viaf.org/> [cited 2012. 9. 10].

22.

Taylor, A. G. “Teaching authority control.” CCQ, Vol.38, No.3-4(2004), pp.43-57.

23.

Tillett, B. B. “Authority control: state of the art and new perspectives.” CCQ, Vol.38, No.3-4(2004), pp.23-41.

24.

Weber, J. “LEAF: Linking and Exploring Authority Files.” CCQ, Vol.38, No.3-4(2004), pp.227-236.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy