바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.44 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on Improving the Evaluation Standard for the Law School : Focusing on the Evaluation Clauses of Law School Library

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2013, v.44 no.1, pp.123-142
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.1.201303.123

(2013). A Study on Improving the Evaluation Standard for the Law School : Focusing on the Evaluation Clauses of Law School Library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(1), 123-142, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.1.201303.123
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The evaluation of the law schools, which had been launched for the purpose of training the lawyers to settle the legal disputes professionally and effectively, had been done on paper and on site from September through October 2012. Based on not only the basic materials for the evaluation such as evaluation standard, manual, and questionnaire but also the problems revealed during the evaluation, this study intended to show the problems of the evaluation clauses of the law school library which is the basis for the professionalism and diversity of law education and suggest the remedies for them. This study shows that the evaluation clauses need to be made considering the scale of each law school rather than suggesting the same quantitative standard in every law school and to be more specific rather than abstract. Especially, to manage the law school library efficiently from now on, it is necessary to plan and practice the idea of developing such as the specialization and to prepare the idea of operating the law school library through the law school members. Additionally, it is desirable that the chapter of the library exists separately and the library facilities are evaluated together with the other school facilities. Lastly, it is necessary to suggest the appropriate model as the norm to each school according to the school scale.

keywords
Law school library, Law school, Approval standard, Law school library evaluation, 법학전문도서관, 법학전문대학원, 로스쿨, 인가기준, 법학전문도서관 평가

Reference

1.

김원만, 이지연. “법학전문도서관 평가에 관한 연구.” 정보관리학회지 제27권, 제1호(2010), pp.165-183.

2.

교육인적자원부. 법학전문대학원 설치인가 신청공고, 교육인적자원부 보도자료(2007.10.30), pp.1-10.

3.

법학전문대학원 설치·운영에 관한 법률, <http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=114964&efYd=20120722#0000> [인용 2012. 10. 30].

4.

법학전문대학원 설치·운영에 관한 법률 시행령, <http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=111972&efYd=20110405#0000> [인용 2012. 10. 30].

5.

법학전문대학원평가위윈회. 법학전문대학원 질의응답집. 서울 : 대한변협 법학전문대학원 평가위원회, 2012.

6.

법학전문대학원평가위윈회. 법학전문대학원 평가기준. 서울 : 대한변협 법학전문대학원평가위원회, 2011.

7.

법학전문대학원평가위윈회. 법학전문대학원 평가매뉴얼. 서울 : 대한변협 법학전문대학원평가위원회. 2011.

8.

신인섭. “｢법학전문대학원 설치·운영에 관한 법률안｣ 정책결정과정에 관한 연구.” 법학연구, 제26집(2007. 5), pp.487-512.

9.

신인섭. 우리나라 교육정책 결정과정에 관한 연구 ; 법학전문대학원 도입정책 사례를 중심으로. 박사학위논문, 경기대학교 대학원 행정학과, 2007.

10.

홍명자. “법학전문대학원 법학전문도서관의 기준에 관한 연구.” 한국도서관·정보학회지, 제37권, 제2호(2006), pp.345-373.

11.

한국도서관협회. 한국도서관기준. 서울 : 한국도서관협회, 2003.

12.

American Bar Association(ABA), 2012-2013 ABA Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools, <http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/misc/legal_education/Standards/chapter_6_2012_2013_aba_standards_and_rules.authcheckdam.pdf> [cited 2012. 11. 2].

13.

Bade, Edward. S. “Quo Vadimus?,” Journal of Legal Education, Vol.2(1949), pp.41-52.

14.

Pulling, Arthur C., “The Harvard Law School Library.” Law Library Journal, Vol.43, No.1(1950), pp.1-11.

15.

Duke University School of Law Library Service, <http://law.duke.edu/lib/facultyservices#lectures> [cited 2012. 11. 22].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy