바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Reading Instruction Standards of International Reading Association

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2014, v.45 no.4, pp.185-205
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.4.201412.185

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study investigated IRA’s 3 standards related to reading instruction and examined the value which can be meaningful to Korean situation. IRA divided reading educators into 7 types and proposed each detailed professional standard through the ‘Standards for reading professionals’. The next standard called ‘Standards for the English language art’ described their direction and content for English language education including reading instruction. The ‘Standards for the assessment of reading and writing’ aims at the basis to evaluate students’ reading ability. The value found through these standards is as follow: IRA’s reading professionals standard can be a useful way to define the type of reading educator in Korea. A reading instruction standard like IRA’s language art standard can guide reading instruction of Korean libraries in a more systemic and consistent way. A valid evaluation standard to measure students’ reading ability can show the possibilities to define the students who struggle with reading and to provide more suitable instruction for them.

keywords
Reading, Reading instruction, International Reading Association, Reading standard, Reading specialist, Reading assessment, School library, 독서, 독서교육, 국제독서협회, 독서기준, 독서교육자, 독서평가, 학교도서관

Reference

1.

공무원임용시험령. 2014. 대통령령 제25648호.

2.

변우열. 2008. 독서교육 지도자의 자질과 양성 프로그램에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 39(3): 187-212.

3.

변우열. 2009. 독서교육의 이해. 고양: 조은글터.

4.

변우열, 이병기. 2006. 학교도서관 중심의 독서교육 내용체계에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관정보학회지, 37(4): 111-141.

5.

이만수. 2009. 독서교육 관련 민간자격 교육과정 분석 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지, 40(3): 181-202.

6.

한국교육과정평가원 홈페이지. 표시과목의 대학의 관련학부(전공학과) 및 기본이수과목 또는 분야, <http://www.kice.re.kr> [인용 2014. 10. 14].

7.

한국도서관협회. 2013. 2013년판 한국도서관기준. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

8.

IRA 2007a Home page. Standards for the Assessment of Reading and Writing, <http://www.reading.org/General/CurrentResearch/Standards/AssessmentStand ards.aspx> [cited 2014. 9. 12].

9.

IRA 2007b Home page. <http://www.reading.org/General/CurrentResearch/Standards/A ssessmentStandards/Assessment_standards_1.aspx> [cited 2014. 9. 27].

10.

IRA 2007c Home page. <http://www.reading.org/General/CurrentResearch/Standards/A ssessmentStandards/Assessment_standards_Table1.aspx> [cited 2014. 9. 27].

11.

IRA 2010a Home page. <http://www.reading.org/General/CurrentResearch/Standards/P rofessionalStandards2010/ProfessionalStandards2010_Introduction.aspx> [cited 2014. 6. 12].

12.

IRA 2010b Home page. <http://www.reading.org/General/CurrentResearch/Standards/Prof essionalStandards2010/ProfessionalStandards2010_Role5.aspx> [cited 2014. 6. 9].

13.

IRA 2010c Home page. <http://www.reading.org/General/CurrentResearch/Standards/P rofessionalStandards2010.aspx> [cited 2014. 8. 22].

14.

IRA 2014 Home page. <http://www.reading.org/general/AboutIRA.aspx> [cited 2014. 6. 9].

15.

IRA & NCTE. 1996. Standards for the English language arts. <http://www.reading.org/L ibraries/reports-and-standards/bk889.pdf> [cited 2014. 7. 15].

16.

NAEP Home page. <http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/bgquest.aspx> [cited 2014. 9. 27].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society