바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on Testing the Korean Cataloguing Rules through Analyzing the RDA Test

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2015, v.46 no.1, pp.155-176
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.1.201503.155


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study was for suggesting the test methods in the revision process of the cataloging rules to understand the problem of draft cataloging rules and to apply the new cataloging rules correctly in libraries instead of collecting the opinions by the traditional seminar and conference in the process of revising KCR, KCR2, KCR3, KCR4. For this study, the literature review and the case study were used as the research methods. The case study was based on the US RDA Test by US RDA Test Coordinating Committee. The evaluation areas of the test were cataloging rules, record creation and system development by reflecting the new cataloging rules, user, and cost. The data for the analysis was the creation of bibliographic records and authority records by librarians, and the question investigations that were the use of institutions, librarians, and users. This study would contribute to revise the cataloging rules in future by analyzing the errors of applying new rules to bibliographic record and by investigating the difficulties of applying rules in completing the bibliographic record. Also, the libraries could be easy to decide to implement the new rules from the creation time of bibliographic record by new rules and the learning curve of new rules.

keywords
자원의 기술과 접근, RDA 테스트, 목록규칙테스트, 목록규칙, 한국목록규칙, 영미목록규칙, 국제목록원칙, 서지레코드의 기능요건, 국제표준서지기술, RDA, RDA test, Cataloging rules test, Cataloging rules, KCR4, AACR2, ICP, FRBR, ISBD

Reference

1.

김정현. 2013. 한국목록규칙의 개정방향에 대한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 44(4): 123-143.

2.

김정현 외. 2014. RDA를 기반으로 한 국가서지데이터의 FRBR 모형 연구 . 서울 : 국립중앙도서관.

3.

한국도서관협회 목록위원회. 1990. 한국목록규칙 . 3.1판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

4.

한국도서관협회 목록위원회. 2003. 한국목록규칙 . 제4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

5.

Boehr, D., R. R. Reynolds, and T. Shrader. 2012. “The U.S. RDA Test Process.” The Serials Librarian, 62(1/4): 125-139.

6.

IFLA Cataloguing Section. 2009. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles.<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf> [cited 2014. 10. 25].

7.

ISBD Review Group. 2011. 국제표준목록규칙 . 이미화 역. 서울: 국립중앙도서관, 2014.

8.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2010. RDA : Resource Description & Access. Chicago: American Library Association.

9.

Kuhagen, J. A. 2011. “Training for the U.S. RDA Test.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8): 572-581.

10.

Luo, C., D. Zhao, and D. Qi. 2014. “China’s Road to RDA.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(6/7): 585-599.

11.

Tillett, B. B. 2011. “Keeping Libraries Relevant in the Semantic Web with Resource Description and Access.” Serials, 24(3): 266-272.

12.

US RDA Test Coordinating Committee. 2011. Report and Recommendations of US RDA Test Coordinating Committee. <http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf> [cited 2012. 6. 20].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society