바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.46 No.2

Citation Share

A Study on the Adoption of the FRBR According to the Bibliographic Relationships of Five Classics and Four Books

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2015, v.46 no.2, pp.317-336
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.2.201506.317

(2015). A Study on the Adoption of the FRBR According to the Bibliographic Relationships of Five Classics and Four Books. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(2), 317-336, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.2.201506.317

Abstract

This paper provides a brief overview of bibliographic relationships, a analysis of bibliographic relationships' characteristics of 2,940 bibliographic records on the Five Classics and Four Books taken from Korean National Bibliography, and a methodology for applying the FRBR model based on analysis of the samples. As results of analysis, the work type ranked high particularly in the commentary, translation with notes, and translation on the original works etc. I suggested adopting conception of supper works, that is, family of works and using uniform title as a connective device between the works, that is, an authorized access point of RDA to apply FRBR model of the Five Classics and Four Books. Also I exemplified the description of uniform title in 630 field as subject added entry.

keywords
서지적 관계, 저작유형, KORMARC 형식, 서지레코드기능요건, 자원접근과 기술, 사서오경, Bibliographic relationships, Work types, KORMARC format, FRBR, RDA, Five classics and four books

Reference

1.

김정현. 2007. 서지적 관계를 기반으로 한 한국어 도서의 저작유형 분석. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 38(3): 183-200.

2.

김정현, 이성숙,이 유정. 2015. KORMARC 서지레코드의 FRBR 알고리즘 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 46(1): 1-23.

3.

김태수. 1994. 목록에서의 서지적 관계와 연결구조에 관한 연구. 文獻情報學論叢: 李載喆敎授定年紀念論文集 , 1994: 159-182.

4.

노지현. 2008. KORMARC 레코드에 대한 FRBR 모델의 적용 실험: 국립중앙도서관 서지레코드를사례로 하여. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 39(2): 291-312.

5.

董桂存, 김정현. 2013. FRBR 모형에 의한 중국어 서지레코드의 저작유형 분석: 중국국가도서관을중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지 , 24(1): 269-286.

6.

송선경. 2010. 고서의 FRBR 모형 기반 서지레코드 요소에 관한 연구 . 석사학위논문, 전남대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과.

7.

이성숙. 2004. FRBR 모형의 수용에 관한 연구 . 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과.

8.

이성숙,이 현 주. 2013. 한국전통음악의 서지적 관계 특성에 따른 FRBR 모형 적용방안. 사회과학연구 , 24(2): 399-421.

9.

이양숙. 1999. 서지적 관계 유형에 기반한 참조시스템에 관한 연구 . 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과.

10.

조재인. 2005. 표현형 계층을 중심으로 한 FRBR 모형분석 및 목록 체계 수용에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 36(2): 221-239.

11.

橋結秋子. 2005. 日本語書誌レコードにおけるFRBRモデルの有用性 : 著作パターンの分析. 日本圖書館情報學會 三田圖書館情報學會 合同硏究大會發表要綱 , 2005: 153-156.

12.

Bennett, Rick, Brian F. Lavoie, Edward T. O'neill. 2003. “The Concept of a Work in WorldCat : an Application of FRBR.” Library Collection, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 27(1): 45-59.

13.

Bertha, Eva. 1993. “Inter-and Intrabibliographical Relationships: a Concept for a Hypercatalog.” In: Opportunity 2000: Understanding and Serving Users in an Electronic Library(Germany, Essen: Essen Univ. Library): 212-223.

14.

IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records; Final Report. München:Saur.

15.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2010. RDA : Resource Description & Access. Chicago: American Library Association.

16.

Smiraglia, R.P. and G.H. Leazer. 1999. “Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: the Work Relationship in a Global Bibliographic Database.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6): 493-504.

17.

Tillett, Barbara B. 1992. “Bibliographic Relationships: an Empirical Study of the LC Machine-Readable Records.” Library Resources & Technical Services, 36(2):162-188.

18.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2001. “Bibliographic Relationships.” In: Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge(Netherlands, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic): 19-35.

19.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2003. “The FRBR Model(Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records),” ALCTS Institute on Metadata and AACR2, April 4-5, 2003, San Jose, CA. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/frbreng.pdf>. [cited 2015. 4. 3].

20.

Vellucci, Sherry L. 1998. “Bibliographic Relationships.” In: The Principles and Future of AACR: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 23-25, 1997(Chicago : ALA): 105-147.

21.

Yee, Martha M. 1998. “Editions: Brainstorming for AACR2000.” In: The Future of the Descriptive Cataloging Rules(Ed., Brian E.C. Schottlaender(Chicago: ALA):40-65.

22.

Zhang, Ying. 2003. Bibliographic Relationships among Chinese Publications: a Bibliographic Study of the Chinese Collections of the East Asia Resources at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. M. A. Thesis, University of North Carolina.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy