바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.47 No.1

Citation Share

Characteristics of Korean Researchers through Bibliometric Analysis of Papers Published in International LIS Journals

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2016, v.47 no.1, pp.217-242
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.1.201603.217
(Florida State University)
(Florida State University)
& (2016). Characteristics of Korean Researchers through Bibliometric Analysis of Papers Published in International LIS Journals. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1), 217-242, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.1.201603.217

Abstract

To investigate the characteristics of Korean researchers who have published journal articles in the international Library and Information Science (LIS) journals, we analyzed the types of institutions of the authors and their disciplines by publication year and journal type. Specifically, we analyzed 819 pieces of author information from 384 articles published between 2005 and 2014 in 31 journals using the existing categories, allowing comparisons of research trends between past and current and between Korean and international researchers. In addition, we used a co-authorship credit allocation method to calculate the credits of individual authors in an accurate manner, and found that 342.6 of 384 papers were contributed by solely Korean researchers. We demonstrated that the internationality and quality of Korean LIS research has increased during this time. In particular, authors who were affiliated with universities took the lead in publishing papers, and we presented that the nature of research might be related to the type of author affiliation. Based on the disciplinary backgrounds of the researchers, we also suggest that LIS research is associated with such disciplines, computer science, management, and communications.

keywords
Researcher characteristics, Social science citation index (SSCI), Library and information science, Bibliometric analysis, 연구자 특성, 사회과학 인용색인, 문헌정보학, 계량분석

Reference

1.

김규환, 남영준. 2009. 국내 기록관리학 분야 학회지 논문 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 43(4): 217-239.

2.

박자현, 송민. 2013. 토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 문헌정보학 연구동향 분석. 『정보관리학회지』, 30(1): 7-32.

3.

서은경. 1997. 정보학분야 연구동향 분석: 정보관리학회지와 JASIS의 비교분석을 중심으로. 『정보관리학회지』, 14(1): 269-291.

4.

서은경. 2010. 정보관리학회지 연구의 동향분석. 『정보관리학회지』, 27(4): 7-32.

5.

서은경, 유소영. 2013. 국내 정보학분야 연구동향 분석. 『정보관리학회지』, 30(4): 215-239.

6.

손정표. 2003. 한국의 문헌정보학분야 석･박사 학위논문의 연구동향 분석. 『한국도서관･정보학회지』, 34(4): 21-42.

7.

송정숙. 2010. 한국 문헌정보학의 연구현황 분석: 2001년~2010년 발행 석･박사 학위논문을 중심으로. 『한국도서관･정보학회지』, 41(4): 333-353.

8.

오세훈. 2005. 우리나라 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 및 인용문헌 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 22(3): 379-408.

9.

이수상. 2013. 연구자 네트워크의 중심성과 연구성과의 연관성 분석. 『한국도서관･정보학회지』, 44(3): 405-428.

10.

이재윤. 2008. 연구자의 투고 학술지 현황에 근거한 국내 학문분야 네트워크 분석. 『정보관리학회지』, 25(4): 327-345.

11.

이재윤. 2014. 공동연구 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 지수에 대한 비교 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 31(3): 153-179.

12.

이재윤, 문주영, 김희정. 2007. 텍스트 마이닝을 이용한 국내 기록관리학 분야 지적구조 분석. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 41(1): 345-372.

13.

이재윤, 최상희. 2013. 계량정보학분야의 협력연구 네트워크 및 문헌네트워크 분석: 국가, 기관, 문헌단위 분석. 『정보관리학회지』, 30(1): 179-191.

14.

이종욱, 양기덕. 2011. 교수연구업적평가법의 계량적 분석: 국내 문헌정보학과 교수연구업적을 중심으로. 『정보관리학회지』, 28(4): 119-140.

15.

이종욱, 양기덕. 2015. “Co-authorship credit allocation methods in the assessment of citation impact of chemistry faculty.”『한국문헌정보학회지』, 49(3): 273-289.

16.

정연경, 최윤경. 2011. 인문･사회과학 분야 교수의 연구업적물 평가에 관한 연구. 『정보관리연구』, 42(3): 211-233.

17.

조인숙, 한미숙. 2007. 문헌정보학분야 연구자들의 학회지 게재논문과 인용학술지 분석 연구. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 18(2): 89-105.

18.

최희곤. 2001. 국제학술지(SSCI)에 등재된 논문을 통한 국내 문헌정보학자들의 연구동향 분석 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 35(2): 5-21.

19.

최희곤. 2003. 국내 문헌정보학 연구자들의 연구동향 분석 연구: LISA & ISA를 중심으로. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 37(1): 61-79.

20.

Andres, A. 2009. Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

21.

Cronin, B. and C. R. Sugimoto. ed. 2014. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

22.

Bordons, M., T. Fernández and G. Isabel. 2002. “Advantages and Limitations in the Use of Impact Factor Measures for the Assessment of Research Performance in a Peripheral Country.” Scientometrics, 53(2): 195-206.

23.

Dong, P., M. Loh and A. Mondry. 2005. “The “Impact Factor” Revisited.” Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2(7). doi:10.1186/1742-5581-2-7s

24.

Finlay, S. C., C. Ni, A. Tsou and C. R. Sugimoto. 2013. “Publish or Practice? An Examination of Librarians’ Contributions to Research.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(4): 403-421.

25.

Hagen, N. T. 2008. “Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis.” PLoS One, 3(12): e4021.

26.

Hagen, N. T. 2014. “Counting and Comparing Publication Output with and without Equalizing and Inflationary Bias.” Journal of Informetrics, 8(2): 310-317.

27.

Landis, J. R. and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics, 33(1): 159-174.

28.

Manzari, L. 2013. “Library and Information Science Journal Prestige as Assessed by Library and Information Science Faculty.” Library Quarterly, 83(10): 42-60.

29.

Meho, L. I. and K. Yang. 2007. “Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13):2105-2125.

30.

Ni, C., C. R. Sugimoto and B. Cronin. 2013. “Visualizing and Comparing Four Facets of Scholarly Communication: Producers, Artifacts, Concepts, and Gatekeepers.”Scientometrics, 94(3): 1161-1173.

31.

Odell, J. and R. Gabbard. 2008. “The Interdisciplinary Influence of Library and Information Science 1996-2004: A Journal-to-journal Citation Analysis.”College & Research Libraries, 69(6): 546-565.

32.

Pritchard, A. 1969. “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?”. Journal of Documentation, 25(4): 348–349.

33.

Seglen, P. O. 1997. “Citations and Journal Impact Factors: Questionable Indicators of Research Quality.” Allergy, 52(11): 1050-1056.

34.

Walters, W. H. and E. I. Wider. 2015. “Disciplinary, National, and Departmental Contributions to the Literature of Library and Information Science, 2007-2012.”Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1002/asi.23448

35.

Thomson Reuters. 2012. The Thomson Reuters Journal Selection Process. <http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/> [cited 2015. 1. 20].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy