바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.48 No.1

Citation Share

The Research Collaboration Pattern of Library and Information Science Field in Korea: Application of Collaboration Indices

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2017, v.48 no.1, pp.191-206
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.191


& (2017). The Research Collaboration Pattern of Library and Information Science Field in Korea: Application of Collaboration Indices. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(1), 191-206, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.191

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the characteristics of research collaborations in the field of LIS. While there are several studies under the unit of analysis of country, there are only a few studies under the unit of analysis of institution in LIS field. For this analysis, we selected eight journals in the KCI (Korea Citation Index) web site, which correspond to the field of LIS through subject classification. The collaborative indices, Collaborative Coefficient, Co-Authorship Index, Local Collaborative Index (LCI), Domestic Collaborative Index (DCI) allowed us to comparatively analyze institutional collaboration patterns in LIS field. In the case of Chung-Ang University, Yonsei University, and Ewha Womans University, collaborative research among professors, graduate students, and professors reflected the fact that collaborations among universities are often performed with professors. In the case of KISTI, which showed a very high index value, the characteristics of project-based research are reflected in the research collaboration pattern.

keywords
Research collaboration, Library and information science, Collaboration index, Institutional collaboration, Joint research, 연구협업, 문헌정보학, 협업지수, 기관협업, 공동연구

Reference

1.

이수상. 2011. 공저빈도에 따른 공저 네트워크의 속성 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지 , 42(2):105-125.

2.

Beaver, D.D., & Rosen, R. 1978. “Studies in scientific collaboration Ⅰ.” Scientometrics, 1(1): 65-84.

3.

Beaver, D.D., & Rosen, R. 1979a. “Studies in scientific collaboration Ⅱ.” Scientometrics, 1(2): 133-149.

4.

Beaver, D.D., & Rosen, R. 1979b. “Studies in scientific collaboration Ⅲ.” Scientometrics, 1(3): 231-245.

5.

Bedwell, W.L., Widlman, J.L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W.S., & Salas, E. 2012. “Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization.” Human Resource Management Review, 22(2): 128-145.

6.

Hou, H., Kretschmer, H.,& Liu, Z. 2008. “The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics.” Scientometrics, 75(2): 189-202.

7.

Melin, G.,& Persson, O. 1996. “Studying research collaboration using co-authorships.” Scientometrics, 36(3): 363-377.

8.

Laudel, G. 2002. “What do we measure by co-authorships?.” Research Evaluation, 11(1): 3-15.

9.

Ajiferuke, I., Burrell, Q.,& Tague, J. 1988. “Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research.” Scientometrics, 14: 421-433.

10.

Garg, K.C.,& Padhi. P. 2001. “A study of collaboration in laser science and technology.” Scientometrics, 51(2): 415-427.

11.

Jiancheng, G.,& Nan, M. 2004. “A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics,” 61(3): 339-359.

12.

Schubert, A.,& Braun, T. 1986. “Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact.” Scientometrics, 9:281-291.

13.

Jeyshankar, B., Nageswara, R.P.,& Arivunithi, P. 2012. “Scientometric analysis of research output on neutrino in India.” International Journal of Digital Library Services, 2(2): 74-84.

14.

Frame, J.D.,& Carpenter, M.P. 1979. “International research collaboration.” Social Studies of Science, 9: 481-497.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy