바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.49 No.2
Citation Share

Analyzing BIBFRAME Cases for the Development of BIBFRAME Application Plans in Korea

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2018, v.49 no.2, pp.59-78
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.2.201806.59

(2018). Analyzing BIBFRAME Cases for the Development of BIBFRAME Application Plans in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2), 59-78, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.2.201806.59
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study is to suggest the concrete application plan of BIBFRAME under the development of BIBFRAME as library specific ontology for linked open data. The several research methods are used as the literature reviews, the case study of LC and LD4P, and the survey of cataloging librarians which is to grasp understanding level of the linked data related terms and requirements for constructing LOD. The application plan is suggested as follows. First, publishing name authority data and subject heading in LOD are prominent as the startup with creating terms list or vocabulary in LOD that has been used in library for controlled vocabulary and data value. Second, it is needed to develop BIBFRAME application and extension modeling in Korea, to map KORMARC and the properties and classes of BIBFRAME, and to develop the editor and MARC to BIBFRAME Transformation Tools. Third, the systematical training for cataloging librarians is designed to regard BIBFRAME related works as the librarian’s main field. Therefore, this study would contribute to seek the practical application plan for BIBFRAME in Korea.

keywords
BIBFRAME, SKOS, FOAF, Ontology, Vocabulary, LD4P, Bibliotek-o, BIBO, LDS, RDF, MADSRDF, Authority control, 링크드데이터, 비브프레임, 온톨로지, 어휘집

Reference

1.

이미화. 2017. BIBFRAME 2.0 특징 분석 및 BIBFRAME 구축시 고려사항에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관・정보학회』, 48(4): 107-127.

2.

한국정보화진흥원. 2014. 『링크드오픈데이터 국내 구축사례집』. 서울: 한국정보화진흥원.

3.

Carlton, T., L. Hawkins and P. Frank. 2017. Module2: The BIBFRAME Editor and the BIBFRAME Linked Data Store. <http://www.loc.gov/catworkshop/bibframe>[cited 2018. 1. 15].

4.

Cornell University Library. 2017. bibliotek-o : An Overview. <https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/LD4P/bibliotek-o+%3A+an+overview> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

5.

Coyle, K. 2010. Metadata Models of the World Wide Web. “ ”Library Technology Reports, 48(4): 12-19.

6.

Coyle, K. 2012a. Semantic Web and Linked Data. “ ”Library Technology Reports, 48(4):10-14.

7.

Coyle, K. 2012b. Metadata Elements. “ ”Library Technology Reports, 48(4): 15-26.

8.

Godby, C. J., S. Wang and J. K. Mixter. 2015. Library Linked Data in the Cloud. California: Morgan and Claypool.

9.

Huerga, I. and M. P. Lauruhn. 2016. Linked Data Implications for Authority Control and “Vocabularies.” In Linked Data for Cultural Heritage. Chicago: ALA.

10.

Kovari, J., S. Folsom and R. Younes. 2017. Towards a BIBFRAME Implementation: the bibliotek-o. <http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3854/2039> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

11.

LD4L Labs and LD4P Ontology Group. 2017. Bibliotek-o: a BIBFRAME Ontology Extension. <https://bibliotek-o.org/1.1/ontology.html> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

12.

LD4P. 2018. Linked Data for Production. <https://wiki.duraspace.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74515029> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

13.

Library of Congress. Acquisitions and Bibliographic Access Directorate. 2016. BIBFRA ME Pilot Phase One: Report and Assessment. <https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/pdf/bibframe-pilot-phase1-analysis.pdf> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

14.

Lovins, D. and D. Hillmann. 2017. Broken-world Vocabularies. “ ”D-Lib Magazine,23(3/4). <https://doi.org/10.1045/march2017-lovins> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

15.

McCallum, S. 2017. BIBFRAME Development. “ ” JLIS.it, 8(3): 71-85. <https://www.jlis.it/article/view/12415> [cited 2017. 7. 15].

16.

Smith-Yoshimura, K. 2016a. Analysis of International Linked Data Survey for Implementers. “ ”D-Lib Magazine, 22(7/8). <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july16/smith-yoshimura/07smith-yoshimura.html> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

17.

Smith-Yoshimura, K. 2016b. Linked Data Implementations: Who, What and Why?<http://campuspress.yale.edu/knowledgepermaculture/2016/12/14/oclc-linked-data-survey/> [cited 2018. 1. 15].

18.

Stanford University Library. 2018a. Stanford Tracer Bullets. <https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/LD4P/Stanford+Tracer +Bullets> [cited 2018. 4. 15].

19.

Stanford University Library. 2018b. Registry of Tools. <https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/LD4P/Registry+of+Tools> [cited 2018. 4. 15].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy