바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.49 No.3
Citation Share

An Analysis of Chracteristics of School Library Program Employing Taxonomy and CIPP Model

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2018, v.49 no.3, pp.263-282
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.3.201809.263

(2018). An Analysis of Chracteristics of School Library Program Employing Taxonomy and CIPP Model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 263-282, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.3.201809.263
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study analyzed nineteen best-practices (161 sub-programs) regarding school library media program. The authors conducted content analysis based on The Library Media Specialist’s Taxonomy and the CIPP Model. In the analysis of taxonomy showing the degree of involvement of librarian teachers, Level Seven indicating a concerted effort to promote school library program was the most important (37.6%). Among the ten levels of taxonomy, the highest level (levels 6 to 10, high involvement of librarians) accounted for 65.9%. According to the analysis of the CIPP Model, (Context) most of the excellent programs were aimed at reading education (41.5%) and library use education (11.3%), and more than half (53.8%) cases were initiated by learners' needs. (Input) excellence programs employed various teaching materials and were operated at fixed time. (Process) the programs were run in a variety of ways, mainly with reading instruction (30.4%) and cultural activities (17.3%). (Product) As a fruit of programs, students and parents’ satisfaction, students’ achievement, self-confidence, and self-improvement were reported.

keywords
School library service, CIPP, The library media specialist’s taxonomy, 학교도서관, 서비스, CIPP, 사서교사 택소노미

Reference

1.

강봉숙. 2018. 사서교사와 타 비교과 교사의 배치 비교를 통한 사서교사 배치 개선방안 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 52(2): 27-47.

2.

교육부, 한국교육개발원. 2017. 『도서관 현황. 교육통계분석자료집-유초중등교육통계편』. 세종: 교육부. <http://kess.kedi.re.kr/publ/publFile?survSeq=2016&menuSeq=3894&publSeq=43&menuCd=69822&menuId=2_4_5&itemCode=02&language=> [cited 2018. 8. 20].

3.

교육부. 2015. 『초･중등학교 교육과정 총론』. 세종: 교육부.

4.

교육인적자원부. 2002. 『학교도서관 활성화 종합방안』. 서울. 교육인적자원부.

5.

권은경. 2014. 학교도서관 활용교육의 현상에 대한 분석 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 45(4): 139-164.

6.

김소희, 서혜란. 2017. 학교도서관 독서프로그램 연구 동향 분석. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 28(4): 363-392.

7.

김종성. 2013. 우리나라 학교도서관 연구의 현황과 과제에 관한 연구. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 24(2): 71-91.

8.

김종성. 2018. 학교도서관 진흥법 개정과 현안 전망. 『한국도서관정보학회 하계 학술발표회』. 2018년 5월 25-26일. 부산: 부산대학교, 151-169.

9.

도서관정보정책위원회. 2017. 『2017년도 전국 도서관 운영평가 지표』. 세종: 문화체육관광부. <https://www.libsta.go.kr/cmm/fms/FileDown.do?atchFileId=FILE_ID_000000000349&fileSn=1>[cited 2018. 8. 20].

10.

문화체육관광부. 2014. 『제2차 도서관발전종합계획(2014~2018)』. 세종: 문화체육관광부. <http://www.mcst.go.kr/web/s_data/deptData/deptDataView.jsp?pMenuCD=0417000000&pSeq=205&pCurrentPage=1&pTypeDept=&pSearchType=TITLE&pSearchWord=> [cited 2018. 8. 20].

11.

박주현, 이명규. 2014. 국내 학교도서관교육의 정책적 현안과 과제. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 48(1): 299-328.

12.

성혜미. 2018. 모든 학교도서관에 사서교사·사서 1명 이상 의무배치. 『연합뉴스』. 8월 14일. <http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2018/08/13/0200000000AKR20180813159900001.HTML?input=1195m>[cited 2018. 8. 20].

13.

정경열, 최유현. 2011. CIPP에 기반한 과학관 과학기술 교육프로그램의 평가준거 개발. 『한국기술교육학회지』, 11(2): 85-103.

14.

『도서관법』. 2018. 법률 제15167호.

15.

『학교도서관진흥법』. 2018. 법률 제15368호.

16.

AASL. 2009. Empowering Learners: Guidelines for School Library Programs. Chicago: ALA.

17.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. 2018. “Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study.” Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1): 189-206.

18.

Loertscher, D. V. 2000. Taxonomies of the school library media program: Michigan Hi Willow Research & Pub.

19.

Stufflebeam, D. L. 2003. The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN), Portland, Oregon.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy