바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

An Analysis of 3D Printer Use Policies with a Focus on the Best Practices of Libraries in the United States

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2019, v.50 no.2, pp.97-119
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.2.201906.97

(Florida State University)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Libraries both in South Korea and abroad have been adopting 3D printers and related service. This indicates the need for documented 3D printer use policy to facilitate the service. This study investigates 3D printer use policies of libraries in Korea and best practices of the United States, and suggests contents for 3D printer use policies in Korea. The finding shows that Korean libraries with 3D printers did not have systematic and documented 3D printer use policies. After conducting content analysis of 16 best practices of 3D printer use policies from libraries in the United States, the authors identified five themes (purpose, users, procedures, limitations of use, and liability) and 21 sub-themes. The findings are informative for Korean libraries to develop 3D printer use policies and to understand various considerations in implementing 3D printer services.

keywords
3D 프린터, 공공도서관, 대학도서관, 메이커스페이스, 이용정책, 3D printer, Public library, Academic library, Makerspace, Use policy

Reference

1.

강봉숙, 정영미. 2018. 학교도서관 메이커스페이스 조성 및 운영에 대한 인식. 한국문헌정보학회지, 52(3): 171-192.

2.

김보영, 곽승진. 2017. 대학도서관의 메이커 스페이스 도입방안 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 48(3): 259-279.

3.

문화체육관광부. 2018. 공공도서관 메이커스페이스 조성 및 가이드라인. 세종: 문화체육관광부.

4.

안인자, 노영희. 2017. 공공도서관 메이커스페이스 조성과 운영 현황조사 분석 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 28(4): 415-436.

5.

안인자, 최상기, 노영희. 2014. 도서관 무한창조공간의 개념 및 프로그램에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(2): 143-171.

6.

장윤금. 2017. 공공도서관 메이커스페이스 구성 및 프로그램 분석 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 51(1): 289-306.

7.

장윤금. 2018. 디지털리터러시 교육 공간으로서의 대학도서관 메이커스페이스. 한국문헌정보학회지, 52(1): 425-446.

8.

American Library Association. 2019. 3-D Printing in Libraries: Policies & Best Practices. <http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/3d_printer_policy/> [cited 2019. 4. 1].

9.

Caldwell-Stone, Deborah. 2015. 3D printing, intellectual freedom and library values.

10.

C. Wapner(2015), “Progress in the making: 3D printing policy considerations through the library lens.” OITP Perspectives, 3, 8-9.

11.

Gonzalez, Sara. R and Bennett, Denise. B. 2014. “Planning and implementing a 3D printing service in an academic library.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 78, 1-14.

12.

Groenendyk, Michael and Gallant, Riel. 2013. “3D printing and scanning at Dalhousie University Libraries: a pilot project.” Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 34-41.

13.

Horton, Jennifer. 2017. “A content analysis of 3D printing policies at academic libraries.” Journal of Library Administration, 57(3), 267-281.

14.

Hoy, Matthew. B. 2013. “3D printing: Making things at the library.” Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32(1), 93-99.

15.

Jones, Barbara. M. 2015. “3D printing in libraries: A view from within the American Library Association: Privacy, intellectual freedom and ethical policy framework.” Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 36-41.

16.

Massis, Bruce. E. 2013. “3D printing and the library.” New Library World, 114(7-8): 351-354.

17.

Moorefield-Lang, Heather. M. 2014. “Makers in the library: Case studies of 3D printers and maker spaces in library settings.” Library Hi Tech, 32(4), 583-593.

18.

Nowlan, Gillian. A. 2015. “Developing and implementing 3D printing services in an academic library.” Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 472-479.

19.

Krippendorff, Klaus. 1989. Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, & W. Schramm (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Communications (Vol. 1, pp. 403-407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press

20.

Slatter, Diane and Howard, Zaana. 2013. “A place to maker, hack, and learn: makerspaces in Austrailian public libraries.” The Austrailian Library Journal, 62(4), 272-284.

21.

Wapner, Charlie. 2015. “Progress in the making: 3D printing policy considerations through the library lens.” OITP Perspectives, 3, 1-21. <http://www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/advleg/pp/pub/perspectives-3D_Library_Policy-ALA_OITP_Perspectives-2015Jan06.pdf>

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society