바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Q-study on Librarians' Role Orientations

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2007, v.38 no.2, pp.13-30
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.2.200706.13


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the role orientation that librarians are expected to carry during their career-life. More specifically, this study examined the pattern of librarians' subjectivism related to attitude, belief, and confidence. Q questions were made of 36 items, including personal value system and role attitude. P sample included 23 librarians. Data were collected for 8 days(from April 15, 2005 to April 22, 2005). Analyses showed the following results. First, librarians' role orientations were classified into 3 types: user-centered orientation, organization-centered orientation, and expertise-centered orientation.(1)The first type librarians were interested in having good relationships with users, while emphasizing the importance of providing good services to the users.(2)The second type of librarians were concerned with social function of the library, while placing highlight on their roles as organizational members. Among them, achievement evaluation was regarded as an important indicator of personal success. They were interested in having stable organizational culture, as well as economic growth of libraries. This orientation was dominant among married members.(3)The third type of librarians focused on librarians' role implementation and professional achievement. They showed interest not only in the improvement of librarians' creativity and the growth of expertises, but also the expansion of retraining opportunities. This orientation was conspicuous among female librarians. Second, several commonalities and differences were consistently found among librarians. The first type was interested in user-centered orientation(user contact, need satisfaction, self dignity, etc.). The second type was interested in organization-centered orientation(economic stability and library growth, ordinance, evaluation, etc.). The third type was interested in expertise-centered orientation(creativity, expertise growth, retraining opportunity, professional achievement. self-respect, etc.).

keywords
Librarian, Image, Q Methodology, 도서관 사서, 이미지, Q 방법론, Librarian, Image, Q Methodology

Reference

1.

(2000) 지식기반사회에서 도서관 관리자의 패러다임 변화에 관한 고찰,

2.

(1997.9) 도서관 자동화에 따른 사서의 전문영역확대-전산사서의 등장-,

3.

(1995.12) 출판인의 역할지향의식에 관한 Q 방법론적 접근,

4.

(1990.) 김흥규. Q 방법론의 이해와 적용. 서울 서강대언론문화연구소,

5.

(2000.3) 사회발전을 위한 도서관의 역할,

6.

(2000.6) 정보환경의 변화와 사서의 역할변용,

7.

(1987) 도서관학과 재학생들의 도서관과 사서직에 대한 인식도 조사연구, 국회도서관보

8.

(2002.9) 사서직의 직업 이미지에 관한 연구,

9.

(2006) 통계청홈페이지 http://kosis.nso.go.kr/cgi-bin/html_out.cgi?F=X72b46_r72b46.html [인용2006.12.01],

10.

(1999.3) Seeking Substainability Discourses with Q Methodology,

11.

(1996.11) Q Methodology and Qualitative Research,

12.

(1995) How is a Possession Me or Not Me? Characterizing Types and a Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment,

13.

(2003.1) How Can we learn to live with pain? A Q-Methodological Analysis of the Divers Understandings of Acceptance of Chronic Pain,

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society