This study is to find new methods in describing material type as content type and carrier type for the improvement of OPAC retrieval and the embodiment of work and expression of FRBR. It is hard to describe type vocabulary in cataloging because division of content and carrier taxonomy in KCR4 and KORMARC is not distinct. This study is to review the characteristics of material type list in RDA and ISBD(2010), and to examine the various type vocabulary and description methods of videorecording, soundrecording, and cartographic by retrieving KERIS DB. As a result, there is no consistency in applying type vocabulary between KCR4 and KORMARC. Also, libraries use the mix of content and carrier or detailed carrier vocabulary for local use. Therefore, it is need to define the function of GMD as content type, to expand and correct content and carrier vocabulary, and to express both content and carrier type in citation and detailed display. This study will contribute to embody the expression of FRBR.
1) Gordon Dunsire, “Distinguishing content from carrier: the RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization," D-Lib Magazine, Vol.13, No.1/2(2007), <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/dunsire/01dunsire.html> [cited 2011. 3. 10].
3) Jean Weihs and Lynne Howarth, “Designating materials: from ‘germane terms’ to element types," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol.45, No.4(2008), pp.3-24.
4) Mauro Guerrini, “GMD: Its function and its history," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol.38, No.2(2004), pp.61-74.
8) Barbara Tillett, General Material Designations(GMDs), 2001, <http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/gmd.pdf> [cited 2011. 4. 5].
9) JSC Format Variation Working Group, Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR(JSC) Format Variation Working Group, 2003, <http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2003/2003-report01.html> [cited 2011. 5. 5].
11) Philip Hider, “A Comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol.47, No.6(2009), pp.544-560.
12) 조재인, “표현형 계층을 중심으로 한 FRBR 모형 분석 및 목록 체계 수용에 관한 연구," 한국도서관․정보학회지, 제36권, 제2호(2005), pp.221-239.
14) Chris Oliver, “Future of the GMD: what can be done to improve it or to find alternate ways to fulfill its function?" Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol.41, No.1(2005), pp.215-217.
15) Heeja Hahn Chung, “User-friendly audiovisual material cataloging at Westchester County Public Library System," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol.31, No.3/4(2001), pp.313-325.
17) Jean Weihs, General Material Designations in the Twenty-first century, 2000, <http://www.olacinc.org/drupal/capc_files/gmd.pdf> [cited 2011. 3. 10].
18) JSC for Revision of AACR, RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization, 2006, <www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2007/5chair10.pdf> [cited 2011. 3. 15].
20) GMD/SMD Working Group, Content and Carrier Terms in RDA, 2006, <http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17891/> [cited 2011. 3. 20].
21) Tom Delsey, Categorization of content and carrier terms in RDA, 2006, <http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5rda-parta-categorization.pdf> [cited 2011. 4. 5].
22) JSC, RDA: Resource Description and Access, 2008, <http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.html> [cited 2011. 4. 5].
23) Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section, International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) Consolidated Edition, 2010, <http://www.ifap.ru/library/book264.pdf> [cited 2011. 2. 15].
24) 한국도서관협회, 한국목록규칙, 제4판(서울 : 한국도서관협회, 2003) 및 국립중앙도서관, KORMARC(서울 : 국립중앙도서관, 2005), <http://www.nl.go.kr/kormarc/c4/page1.jsp> [cited 2011. 3. 10]을 참조함.